And your post have any merit? they are in what way constructive to discovery and science? at least I try and make an effort to find and discover new.
Science laughed at Tesla once or twice I believe , you mistake stupidity for simplicity.
Yup, especially when he talked bollocks.
Agreed, although Tesla did have something going for him in the line of logic and intelligence.
You should totally present this to some physicists. Better yet, make a Youtube video. It would be a classic.
I am trying to present it to some Physicist's by being here, I can think up the ideas but as what to do with the ideas becomes at a loss to me and I would not know what to do with information.
You are. They are correcting your mistakes. Will you learn from them, or ignore them?
They have indeed, and many of the secrets they have unlocked are truly brilliant. Do you have the vision to see them?
From inside a bin there is no vision, ignorance is bliss, I wish I had remained ignorant to science , mistakes? I only see mistakes in science, I see truth's that are not truth's.
See what you want Paddy, I know it is not true.From where I sit, I see an hallucinatory delusional condition, that appears well beyond redemption. Sad,
Perhaps. Some of us prefer to not live in a bin, and instead see the world outside our own imaginings.
I don't think you are crazy; I just think you are exhibiting Dunning-Krueger effect, which is common in people with a little scientific knowledge.
I understand you may think I am suffering from Dunning-Krueger effect and in some way the knowledge I have learnt, I think in some way I have advanced to a superior level than the world, however this is truly not the case, I genuine understand the topics I debate and do see that it is science who has the misconception about some of it's content.
You have said exactly that several times - that your understanding of science is superior to everyone else's, and that it is our failure that we cannot understand your brilliant insights into gravity and how "darkness is a real thing and light is an illusion."
QED.
At some point you will have to come to terms with the fact that it is not a simple lack of writing skill, you lack skill in science. In the other thread, for example, you made it clear you do not understand how buoyancy works. Your time would be better spent learning about such basics.
I understand your version of buoyancy, my argument was of a different nature, I would argue science knows about buoyancy but does not understand it.
Given that it has been proven thousands of times via practical experiments, your statement is not based in reality.
Do you understand that the above statement is directly contradicted by the one that follows it: