yes all the way idiot.
It is always dark, Light is an illusion and not a thing!
- Thread starter theorist-constant12345
- Start date
- Status
No.
I see using my eyes.
you see with your brain do you not know nothing?
The only references you have ever referred to are delusional nonsensical fairy tale applications, to somehow "impress"on others, you are able to "think" [although I use that word loosely] for yourself.
it is not fairy tales, you see in the dark in the daytime by sufficient intensity and sufficient spectral range , that is a true statement.
You remove the Sun, it becomes pitch black , you no longer can see, you have neither intensity or range to see, your brain has no coupling by electrical energy to matter and your vision is obscured by the dark.
Um, try to read what I wrote.
I use my eyes for seeing - no eyes, no sight.
(And your statement depends on how you define "see" - as does mine).
No brain no sight , all you see is in your head, your eyes are no more than a photo lens that allows your mind to remotely sense at the speed of light interaction within the submerged constant , that your eyes are coupled to all matter and observe change in the constant you are submerged in.
Which still doesn't affect my "no eyes, no sight" statement.
Oh, you mean we USE OUR EYES in the process of seeing?
Meaningless word salad. Again.
yes your eyes are used in the process of sight,
let me try to get you understand the content of the word salad.
Einstein's constant speed of light c, in 3 dimensional space is also a constant to sight , in simple terms the space between objects filled with air is at a constant of see through.
The light hitting the matter you are viewing is no longer at a constant to the air constant, and for a fraction of second stops to reflect giving the illusion of spectral colors.
Your eyes are coupled to the object by the air constant, get it?
I think i got it, our brains use the electromagnetic part of the radiation to couple to objects.
Last edited:
Which is what I said.
So your "point", whatever it was, hasn't been made.
You cannot explain word salad by spouting utter unmitigated bollocks.
More word salad.
Not your night, is it?
it is not word salad the real science types will understand it, it is a shame you can not. You have no idea that when a wave hits shores , it crashes and creates a force?
you have no idea that matter creates an energy flux in the constant?
It IS word salad.
And I AM a "real science type".
(A wave does not "create a force").
More word salad.
You have no idea that a prism is an energy flux of the constant by angle and permeability
Em radiation is a magnetic constant to sight, the vacuum permeability is a constant, a magnetic wave breaks at the stop pass band of which ever defining matter to the spectral range, the wave circumnavigate at the stop pass band, accumulating propagation and heat exciting the matters electrons corresponding to heat signature and magnetic magnitude for the coupling to define has spectral colours to sight differing from the permeability constant of air and space.
Sorry about misspelling your name Dywyddyr but I don't want to loose any of you, you all are very beautiful creations of the most high when I think I could loose one of you it brings me great pain . I think you all here are great paddo you are a very intelligent person as far as I can tell you have written some impressive post and you crash is also another intelligent one but what we all lack is gentleness and acceptance towards our fellow man even if he may not be right, there are times when I notice that you all seem to be talking about the same thing but just using a different way to express it, some more scientifically mainstream than others, but being right is not the only goal to achieve in life we must love and cherish each other because every single one of us is special and has a little to offer.
Word salad.
Meaningless word salad.
So what?
Nothing to do with vision.
Er yeah...
More drivel.
For a start do you mean "band-pass" or "band-stop"?
Things don't "accumulate propagation".
Oh, and when it's air the term is relative permeability, not "permeability constant".
Then you should improve your discernment.
Some of us - e.g. theorist-constant and you, aren't being scientific at all, and neither are talking about the same thing as the rest of us. I.e. you two talk b*llocks, we talk science.
Citation needed.
Some have NOTHING AT ALL TO OFFER in certain arenas.
But, unfortunately, they lack the mental acuity to realise this.
You say so what, to the vacuum permeability is a constant, i am trying to show you that light in space and air is at a constant to sight by the vacuum permeability is a constant, and that is why we do not see spectral colour in empty space.
I mean it has to stop at matter to reflect for a fraction of second, and the wave is therefore different depending on absorbing and reflective properties of the matter the light is reflecting off
Because if there were no light we wouldn't see.
That's it.
So what?
What?
- Status