It is always dark, Light is an illusion and not a thing!

[paddoboy]

Paddy I understand that in my quest for the truth in learning, due to my learning style, I will be thought of as deluded, it is not everyday someone comes up and says even though its light do you realise it is dark!,
I know it sounds insane, which makes it not insane.

???? That last sentence just threw me!

Please feel free to test me on EM radiation, please feel free to test me on anything, I have learnt Paddy , I am not the fish from the other forums you remember, my other forum of about 3 years have give me holy hell, there is some good scientists on there although it is not exactly mainstream in what you may call a science forum.

I'm not qualified to test you, and even if I was you would still not accept the truth. That's what delusional is all about, boosted by have an inflated ego.
It is a sickness that needs some professional advice.

Let me tell you now that despite your inane claims...
* Dark is simply the absence of light....
* Light is a certain wave length of the EMS, that interacts with ones eye
* Light is capable of reflection, refraction, and absorbtion.
*EMS and subsequently light are real.
* Space is real, time is real...They both evolved from the BB.
* Before t+10-43 seconds, is not covered by current theories and models.
* The BB is a model of universal/spacetime evolution from a hot dense state
* Before that, we are only able to logically speculate.
* The only aspect of darkness being real I can think of is from the bible. [In the beginning there was darkness on the void] Is this your reference?
* Even spacetime without any star light is not dark in reality. It is at a temperature of 2.7K and which we refer to as the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation, or the CMBR.

All those points are accepted evidenced based science. All those points have stood the test of time...
If you want to learn or add to human knowledge, then pick an arena that needs explanation, and is covered by your own qualifications whatever they may be.
Because at present, on both issues of explanations re light and dark, and your qualifications, you are failing dismally, and in the process, making yourself a target for laughter and derision, due to your delusional affliction and inflated ego.
The whole world ain't wrong Son......No one, including any of your Imaginary agreeable friends will ever believe that.

 

[paddoboy]

None of that, my friends are proper sceptics and do argue back , it is because with my hands etc, I can demonstrate quite easily the content I am referring to.

Let's hear from these friends and the way they understand you.

 

[theorist-constant12345]

???? That last sentence just threw me!





I'm not qualified to test you, and even if I was you would still not accept the truth. That's what delusional is all about, boosted by have an inflated ego.
It is a sickness that needs some professional advice.

Let me tell you now that despite your inane claims...
* Dark is simply the absence of light....
* Light is a certain wave length of the EMS, that interacts with ones eye
* Light is capable of reflection, refraction, and absorbtion.
*EMS and subsequently light are real.
* Space is real, time is real...They both evolved from the BB.
* Before t+10-43 seconds, is not covered by current theories and models.
* The BB is a model of universal/spacetime evolution from a hot dense state
* Before that, we are only able to logically speculate.
* The only aspect of darkness being real I can think of is from the bible. [In the beginning there was darkness on the void] Is this your reference?
* Even spacetime without any star light is not dark in reality. It is at a temperature of 2.7K and which we refer to as the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation, or the CMBR.

All those points are accepted evidenced based science. All those points have stood the test of time...
If you want to learn or add to human knowledge, then pick an arena that needs explanation, and is covered by your own qualifications whatever they may be.
Because at present, on both issues of explanations re light and dark, and your qualifications, you are failing dismally, and in the process, making yourself a target for laughter and derision, due to your delusional affliction and inflated ego.
The whole world ain't wrong Son......No one, including any of your Imaginary agreeable friends will ever believe that.

The first part that threw you, I know my idea sounds to anyone including myself insane, but I also know by the science it is not insane.

All the other things you put I am well aware that is present info and accepted info. Dark is not simply the absence of light, you are truly mistaken, dark is always there and the light masks it. Turn off your light it will go dark, the dark is not added it is always there.
Space is the absence of matter, yes it is real, time is real but has the absolute value of zero with no beginning and no end.
Time and space did not evolve from the big bang, time and space pre date the big bang, the big bang has to have spacial volume to be in.
Before that , we do not need to speculate, a hot dense state is matter pre dating the big bang,
the bible good reference, however in the beginning there was no bible either, some story teller wrote the bible, days of science with no equipment, so god was invented.
CMBR you would think I was mad If i answer that, I believe that is the magnetic bottling to make the fusion plasma reactor.

 

[paddoboy]

The first part that threw you, I know my idea sounds to anyone including myself insane, but I also know by the science it is not insane.

NO, THERE IS NO SCIENCE, JUST DELUSIONS!

All the other things you put I am well aware that is present info and accepted info. Dark is not simply the absence of light, you are truly mistaken, dark is always there and the light masks it. Turn off your light it will go dark, the dark is not added it is always there.
Space is the absence of matter, yes it is real, time is real but has the absolute value of zero with no beginning and no end.
Time and space did not evolve from the big bang, time and space pre date the big bang, the big bang has to have spacial volume to be in.
Before that , we do not need to speculate, a hot dense state is matter pre dating the big bang,
the bible good reference, however in the beginning there was no bible either, some story teller wrote the bible, days of science with no equipment, so god was invented.
CMBR you would think I was mad If i answer that, I believe that is the magnetic bottling to make the fusion plasma reactor.

I've given you some good advice about your current afflictions.
I'm now getting rather bored at your continued trolling.
It's your thread that is in pseudoscience.....It's you that have been permanently banned elsewhere.

Consider...It's not much of a life to be fanatically believing in some hypothetical concept that no one else believes and that you will inevitably take to the grave with you.

Or possibly you enjoy trolling for these confrontational issues and this explains your previous permanent bannings.
Either way I would still seek help.

 

[Dywyddyr]

but I also know by the science it is not insane.

Given that your knowledge of science is essentially zero then no, you don't "know by science it is not insane".

All the other things you put I am well aware that is present info and accepted info.

And yet you persistently get it wrong. So much for being "well aware".

Dark is not simply the absence of light

Yes it is.

you are truly mistaken, dark is always there and the light masks it.

If it's light it is, by definition, NOT DARK.

Turn off your light it will go dark, the dark is not added it is always there.

No one claims that dark is "added".

Space is the absence of matter

What?

time is real but has the absolute value of zero

If it has a "value of zero" then it's non-existent. How can it be "real" if it doesn't exist?

with no beginning and no end.

How can something with a "value of zero" have no beginning and no end?

Time and space did not evolve from the big bang, time and space pre date the big bang, the big bang has to have spacial volume to be in.

Unsupported by ANY science.

the bible good reference

Not for anything regarding science.

however in the beginning there was no bible either, some story teller wrote the bible, days of science with no equipment, so god was invented.

Nope.
It certainly wasn't "days of science".
The Bible is not scientific.
There is no science in the Bible.

CMBR you would think I was mad If i answer that, I believe that is the magnetic bottling to make the fusion plasma reactor.

You ARE mad. And wrong.

 

[theorist-constant12345]

NO, THERE IS NO SCIENCE, JUST DELUSIONS!




I've given you some good advice about your current afflictions.
I'm now getting rather bored at your continued trolling.
It's your thread that is in pseudoscience.....It's you that have been permanently banned elsewhere.

Consider...It's not much of a life to be fanatically believing in some hypothetical concept that no one else believes and that you will inevitably take to the grave with you.

Or possibly you enjoy trolling for these confrontational issues and this explains your previous permanent bannings.
Either way I would still seek help.

I thought you was going to be genuine for a minute but obviously the god troll came back, you are so wrong and misguided, if tonight while you sleep I drug you and make an operation adding a tapetum lucidum to your eyes, canyou please explain to all the viewers what you will observe tomorrow night outside ?

 

[theorist-constant12345]

Given that your knowledge of science is essentially zero then no, you don't "know by science it is not insane".


And yet you persistently get it wrong. So much for being "well aware".


Yes it is.


If it's light it is, by definition, NOT DARK.


No one claims that dark is "added".


What?


If it has a "value of zero" then it's non-existent. How can it be "real" if it doesn't exist?


How can something with a "value of zero" have no beginning and no end?


Unsupported by ANY science.


Not for anything regarding science.


Nope.
It certainly wasn't "days of science".
The Bible is not scientific.
There is no science in the Bible.


You ARE mad. And wrong.

avoid the question of proof troll killing your beloved god....

 

[theorist-constant12345]

Do you not get , god said let there be light, I am trying to prove light is not real therefore disproving all gods and holy bullshit.

 

[Dywyddyr]

avoid the question of proof troll killing your beloved god....

Which part of "atheist" did you not understand?
You haven't provided ANY proof - of anything you've claimed.

Do you not get , god said let there be light, I am trying to prove light is not real therefore disproving all gods and holy bullshit.

1) The definition of light in use here (by the majority of posters) is the scientific one - nothing to do with "god" at all.
2) Light IS real - you (especially YOU) can't "prove" it's not real for one simple reason: it is real.
3) Regardless of my atheism: a disproof of light would NOT be a disproof of "god" (any of them, let alone "all").

 

[theorist-constant12345]

Which part of "atheist" did you not understand?
You haven't provided ANY proof - of anything you've claimed.

Yes i have it is you who is not listening or understanding, answer the operation question about the eyes, it is axiom proof.

 

[paddoboy]

I thought you was going to be genuine for a minute but obviously the god troll came back, you are so wrong and misguided, if tonight while you sleep I drug you and make an operation adding a tapetum lucidum to your eyes, canyou please explain to all the viewers what you will observe tomorrow night outside ?

So we are all God trolls now??
As I suggested previously when you called me that, maybe you should ask the God trolls I have crossed swords with about me being a God Troll.
And obviously the falsity of that claim just further more adds to your delusional and ego inflated afflictions.
Take it easy theorist...take an aspro and have a good lie down.
I'm really trying to help you and all these absurdities that you seem to accept.

 

[paddoboy]

Which part of "atheist" did you not understand?
You haven't provided ANY proof - of anything you've claimed.

Join the club Dywyddyr. He's getting rather frustrated now, as I have also been labeled a God troll.
Is there a Doctor in the house?

 

[theorist-constant12345]

So we are all God trolls now??
As I suggested previously when you called me that, maybe you should ask the God trolls I have crossed swords with about me being a God Troll.
And obviously the falsity of that claim just further more adds to your delusional and ego inflated afflictions.
Take it easy theorist...take an aspro and have a good lie down.
I'm really trying to help you and all these absurdities that you seem to accept.

I know you mean well , and i am not chucking it in your face, i am confident I am correct and not because I am deluded but because the evidence certainly suggests it.

 

[paddoboy]

Yes i have it is you who is not listening or understanding, answer the operation question about the eyes, it is axiom proof.

\

No you havn't. You have nothing, no science, no axiom, no theory, no reasonable hypothesis.
A child like fairy tale would best describe what you are claiming. You are delusional and the affliction needs attention.

 

[Dywyddyr]

Yes i have it is you who is not listening or understanding, answer the operation question about the eyes, it is axiom proof.

No, it wouldn't be a proof nor would it be an axiom.
(You still appear to under considerable confusion over the meaning of "axiom").
What makes you think a tapetum lucidum helps your case?
I'd see better in low light levels because it reflects visible light back through the retina, increasing the light available to the photoreceptors.
I.e. it makes "better" use of existing light - f*ck all to do with whatever you're claiming.

 

[Dywyddyr]

i am confident I am correct and not because I am deluded but because the evidence certainly suggests it.

Nope.
It's because you're deluded.
And clueless.

 

[paddoboy]

I know you mean well , and i am not chucking it in your face, i am confident I am correct and not because I am deluded but because the evidence certainly suggests it.

If you were not deluded and if you were confident you were correct, you would not claim bald face lies at least twice to two different people, who can be shown to not be as you claim.
That alone convicts you as a troll.

 

[theorist-constant12345]

\

No you havn't. You have nothing, no science, no axiom, no theory, no reasonable hypothesis.
A child like fairy tale would best describe what you are claiming. You are delusional and the affliction needs attention.

You lie, I offer observational experiments that people can witness for themselves, I offer truths and examples that can not be denied, you and you post pal are trolls.
I offer you this in evidence that is more than obvious.

I have two cameras a and b.

a-has night vision , can see in very low energy levels of light

b-has no night vision and needs a greater intensity of light to see in the dark, such as turning on flood lights.

That is an axiom and perfect explanation comparing the sun to a flood light to be able to see in the dark so stop lying.

 

[Dywyddyr]

I offer you this in evidence that is more than obvious.
I have two cameras a and b.
a-has night vision , can see in very low energy levels of light
b-has no night vision and needs a greater intensity of light to see in the dark, such as turning on flood lights.
That is an axiom and perfect explanation comparing the sun to a flood light to be able to see in the dark so stop lying.

Again you misuse the word "axiom".
HOW does this "prove" your claim?

 

[theorist-constant12345]

If you were not deluded and if you were confident you were correct, you would not claim bald face lies at least twice to two different people, who can be shown to not be as you claim.
That alone convicts you as a troll.

none of you offer any proof to contradict my thread and idea, you are the deluded one for real, we all can see this that you think it is amusing, when I am serious, you and dy are together a pair of multi poster god trolls trying to stop science progress.