It is always dark, Light is an illusion and not a thing!

[theorist-constant12345]

you should take your own advice.

Honestly krash is it not me who does not know what I am talking about, my first forum several years ago my idea was that light was transparent, because in the open space between my eyes and an object it is invisible, no spectrum, colourless, etc.
I then realised my error, and it was the dark that is transparent to light and the dark is the constant state and natural of the Universe. It is not even hard to understand, the Sun is a black body, the emitting ''light'' travels in a linearity so fast that the effect is invisible until it is in interaction and then becomes a wave.

 

[krash661]

i have mentioned this to you before. all you are doing or have done is state that dark is the dominant element. nothing more. this is nothing of any substances since it's already known. you just twist it into something that's no different except in your own mind.
agian,
you should take your own advice.

 

[Jason.Marshall]

Hey you guys give the constant theorist a break I admire his bravery no one thus far has the complete answer and whole story but there is one man that accomplished the unification but he is not promoted because he dared to use God in his calculations he has unified the 4 forces + one more unknown one, here is the link http://www.google.ca/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=4&sqi=2&ved=0CC4QFjAD&url=http://www.math.buffalo.edu/mad/physics/Animalu_Alex_GAGUTreview1.pdf&ei=doKxVP73LdikyAS2uYGYCg&usg=AFQjCNFsblhHpEPWfzcc3J7sXfjUOEdqqw&sig2=9nA8hShH3-CG3bckZdHTfg&bvm=bv.83339334,d.aWw

 

[paddoboy]

you know absolutely nothing in science, I challenge any of you mug heads because I am way ahead of you guys in my understanding of The theory of everything , because I simply understand reality and do not accept garbage.
I learnt , I read, I realised you are all wrong,

Put me in the bin, I do not care, it is not my loss if I quit science, it is a loss to science because I really do get it and understand it all, every single science subject I get, something clicked and I understood.

To be honest I am getting bored of getting nowhere and soon will quit, life is to short , it is not my fault you have all been such fools and actually believe all the garbage that is far from the actual truth.


Suit your selves and carry on living in your make believe world, I am telling the truth and will swear to the truth.

Wow!!!!
This is truly sad.

 

[paddoboy]

Hey you guys give the constant theorist a break I admire his bravery no one thus far has the complete answer and whole story but there is one man that accomplished the unification but he is not promoted because he dared to use God in his calculations

We have no evidence what-so-ever for anything at all resembling any God.
And as science progresses, this apparent "comforting need for a God" is continually being pushed further and further back into oblivion.
As far as giving our troubled friend constant theorist a break, I have already done that.
And I certainly hope for his own good he takes my advice before his obsession takes him beyond the point of no return, if he hasn't already reached that stage.

I sincerely suggest that you need to stop hindering any help that is offered to him, and comforting his delusional obsessions, of "the whole world is wrong and I'm the only one right" is certainly not helping him in any way.

 

[Dywyddyr]

Hey you guys give the constant theorist a break I admire his bravery

Bravery without actual substance is a waste of time. He has no clue about science.

but there is one man that accomplished the unification but he is not promoted because he dared to use God in his calculations he has unified the 4 forces + one more unknown one

He's "not promoted" because he's a nutcase.
He hasn't "accomplished unification" at all.

 

[Jason.Marshall]

Bravery without actual substance is a waste of time. He has no clue about science.


He's "not promoted" because he's a nutcase.
He hasn't "accomplished unification" at all.

Why is he a nutcase because he used God in his calculations his math is perfect I bet you cant show me a flaw besides say God is not allowed in science? am daring you to debunk his tensor?

 

[Jason.Marshall]

Why is he a nutcase because he used God in his calculations his math is perfect I bet you cant show me a flaw besides say God is not allowed in science? am daring you to debunk his tensor?

and by the way no one is perfect at least the constant theorist is brave enough to try and he seems happy because its seems like he is following his dream wrong or right if you don't take any shots you get a hundred percent of nothing.

 

[Jason.Marshall]

and by the way no one is perfect at least the constant theorist is brave enough to try and he seems happy because its seems like he is following his dream wrong or right if you don't take any shots you get a hundred percent of nothing.

dywyder God loves you don't allow them to take you we want you on our side

 

[paddoboy]

Why is he a nutcase because he used God in his calculations his math is perfect I bet you cant show me a flaw besides say God is not allowed in science? am daring you to debunk his tensor?

So if his maths is flawless as you say, why havn't we heard more of this great awe-inspring mind of his?
Why hasn't his flawless maths been accepted?
Or will you now shout "conspiracy!" by mainstream science as near all our alternative nuts do.

and by the way no one is perfect at least the constant theorist is brave enough to try and he seems happy because its seems like he is following his dream wrong or right if you don't take any shots you get a hundred percent of nothing.

Correct, no one is perfect, but I certainly do not believe he is brave by any stretch of the imagination.....brave because he likes to show he thinks for himself, no matter how foolishly inane his thinking really is?
Everyone learns from previous generations and intellectual giants......
To 100% forgo that learning, so as to fanatically show he can think for himself, is not logical when that thinking is shrouded in ignorance of what has already been achieved in science.

The evidence for the BB, and evolution is so convincing and evidenced based, that even the Catholic church recognise both.
From there though they then again depart from the tried and true discipline of science.

 

[Dywyddyr]

Why is he a nutcase because he used God in his calculations his math is perfect I bet you cant show me a flaw besides say God is not allowed in science? am daring you to debunk his tensor?

"God" is not scientific.
(More accurate than stating "god is not allowed in science").
You can't introduce "god" into science unless there's a fixed, meaningful, definition and a mathematical basis for doing so. As it stands "god" is merely a nebulous concept with zero applicability to science.

The maths is utter nonsense.
For example: VsoundVword = c^2 (page 13 from your link).
Sound doesn't travel in space, therefore Vsound = 0.
Vword (supposedly the "speed of creation") is completely meaningless from a scientific and a mathematical stance.

and by the way no one is perfect at least the constant theorist is brave enough to try and he seems happy because its seems like he is following his dream wrong or right if you don't take any shots you get a hundred percent of nothing.

He's not brave he's merely deluded.
And he'll still end up nothing (as far as science goes).

dywyder God loves you don't allow them to take you we want you on our side

Oh look, you can't even copy my name correctly.
The claim that "god loves me" is unsupported by any facts.
I have no idea who is trying to "take me" and, to be frank, I'd rather die than "be on your side".

 

[theorist-constant12345]

So if his maths is flawless as you say, why havn't we heard more of this great awe-inspring mind of his?
Why hasn't his flawless maths been accepted?
Or will you now shout "conspiracy!" by mainstream science as near all our alternative nuts do.



Correct, no one is perfect, but I certainly do not believe he is brave by any stretch of the imagination.....brave because he likes to show he thinks for himself, no matter how foolishly inane his thinking really is?
Everyone learns from previous generations and intellectual giants......
To 100% forgo that learning, so as to fanatically show he can think for himself, is not logical when that thinking is shrouded in ignorance of what has already been achieved in science.

The evidence for the BB, and evolution is so convincing and evidenced based, that even the Catholic church recognise both.
From there though they then again depart from the tried and true discipline of science.

Wrong Paddy, I am not in ignorance of science, I have being telling you all this is your own science, I have simply put things together without a biased look or information biased by early learning. To put it into context Einstein told me from the legacy he left behind for us to follow. I am not the dick head you think I am.
I am not arguing that a big bang happened, or anything you know is not real etc, I am arguing that your understanding of the entire picture is wrong, I know from all the forums, forums technically have been my testing ground, and the answers are always the same, the manner of the members is always the same.
Do you not realise in person, I can explain my concepts and show you quite easy on a chalk board the reality of what is what!.
Maybe it is my simplicity to life that allows me to see this, I do not know, but has a smart person who clearly understands your content I am telling you all that science understanding of science , is completely wrong, and all the forums do is mock me.
I just need one person to listen and understand who knows more maths, more knowledge than myself, then they will explain in minutes.

The evidence is your own evidence, night vision shows you the why's, lasers show you the why's, my Cat is undeniable .....

 

[paddoboy]

Wrong Paddy, I am not in ignorance of science,

I beg to differ, and the evidence supports my view.

I am not the dick head you think I am.

I never said that. I do though 100% believe you are delusional and have a grossly over-inflated ego, that is evident in all our alternative pushers.
Plus of course the conspiracy nonsense that you and your ilk then claim.

I am not arguing that a big bang happened, or anything you know is not real etc, I am arguing that your understanding of the entire picture is wrong, I know from all the forums, forums technically have been my testing ground, and the answers are always the same, the manner of the members is always the same.
Do you not realise in person, I can explain my concepts and show you quite easy on a chalk board the reality of what is what!.
Maybe it is my simplicity to life that allows me to see this, I do not know, but has a smart person who clearly understands your content I am telling you all that science understanding of science , is completely wrong, and all the forums do is mock me.
I just need one person to listen and understand who knows more maths, more knowledge than myself, then they will explain in minutes.

The evidence is your own evidence, night vision shows you the why's, lasers show you the why's, my Cat is undeniable .....

I gave you some good advice. You need to take it, seriously.

 

[theorist-constant12345]

I beg to differ, and the evidence supports my view.



I never said that. I do though 100% believe you are delusional and have a grossly over-inflated ego, that is evident in all our alternative pushers.
Plus of course the conspiracy nonsense that you and your ilk then claim.





I gave you some good advice. You need to take it, seriously.

Paddy I understand that in my quest for the truth in learning, due to my learning style, I will be thought of as deluded, it is not everyday someone comes up and says even though its light do you realise it is dark!,
I know it sounds insane, which makes it not insane.
Please feel free to test me on EM radiation, please feel free to test me on anything, I have learnt Paddy , I am not the fish from the other forums you remember, my other forum of about 3 years have give me holy hell, there is some good scientists on there although it is not exactly mainstream in what you may call a science forum.

 

[paddoboy]

Paddy I understand that in my quest for the truth in learning, due to my learning style, I will be thought of as deluded, it is not everyday someone comes up and says even though its light do you realise it is dark!,
I know it sounds insane, which makes it not insane.
Please feel free to test me on EM radiation, please feel free to test me on anything, I have learnt Paddy , I am not the fish from the other forums you remember, my other forum of about 3 years have give me holy hell, there is some good scientists on there although it is not exactly mainstream in what you may call a science forum.

Near all Mothers love their own children unconditionally and despite faults etc, and will stand by them in any situation.
This is what you and your hypotheticals are analogous to.

 

[theorist-constant12345]

Near all Mothers love their own children unconditionally and despite faults etc, and will stand by them in any situation.
This is what you and your hypotheticals are analogous to.

And what do you want from me, have you ever tried to explain something new that no one seems to understand, yet I ask people in real life and they get it.

 

[paddoboy]

And what do you want from me, have you ever tried to explain something new that no one seems to understand, yet I ask people in real life and they get it.

Maybe they just dont want to offend you.....I'm like that. I often take the "Yes dear" approach to avoid any hurt.

 

[Dywyddyr]

learning style

Made up crap, you've already been given a link that shows "learning style" is nonsense.

I will be thought of as deluded

Due to the fact that you are.

it is not everyday someone comes up and says even though its light do you realise it is dark!

That's because there are very few people dumb enough to think this, let alone say it in public.

I know it sounds insane, which makes it not insane.

If this is an example of what passes for logic in your mind it's no wonder you come up with such drivel.

I have learnt Paddy , I am not the fish from the other forums you remember, my other forum of about 3 years have give me holy hell

Then why are repeating the same utter nonsense that got you banned?

 

[theorist-constant12345]

Maybe they just dont want to offend you.....I'm like that. I often take the "Yes dear" approach to avoid any hurt.

None of that, my friends are proper sceptics and do argue back , it is because with my hands etc, I can demonstrate quite easily the content I am referring to.

 

[theorist-constant12345]

Made up crap, you've already been given a link that shows "learning style" is nonsense.


Due to the fact that you are.


That's because there are very few people dumb enough to think this, let alone say it in public.


If this is an example of what passes for logic in your mind it's no wonder you come up with such drivel.


Then why are repeating the same utter nonsense that got you banned?

You are saying Honey and Mumford is crap? I completely disagree because I understand learning and styles and could write a book on learning styles , the main style is the stereotypical learner, your style.