It is always dark, Light is an illusion and not a thing!

[theorist-constant12345]

You do indeed see reflection in the smoke. You do indeed see attenuation due to the reflection of the beam in the smoke.

A laser shining directly into your eye is an incident ray from the laser. If you see the beam from the side, then it is due to reflected light. That's the definition.

Correct. Smoke particles have reflective surfaces. That's why you can see smoke, both in normal light and in lasers.

No, color is color and propagation is propagation. They are different.

Close to correct! Different photons at different places on the spectrum (i.e. different colors, or different frequencies) do indeed have different energies. A spectrum is made up of photons of different energies, based on their wavelength.

Oh please, stop lying, white light is not a mixture of frequencies, only by interaction do you have a spectrum, honestly I got it from day one. Lasers do not have any other content except the linearity of the beam, I have experimented and you are wrong, I observe only an incident ray in the smoke , and do not observe Photons travelling through the smoke in the direction of your eyes, colour is propagation distinguished by absorbing and reflective properties, ''light'' propagates on the surfaces, hence colour temperatures.
You see in the dark, light is the illusion in your head, get over it, no big deal, quite cool when you consider it.

 

[theorist-constant12345]

You have a lot to learn... and you have a huge ego to manage.
Just as there is no such thing as a perfect reflector, so to is there no such thing as a perfect absorber other than BH's.
Colour of any object, simply in the first instance, depends on the nature of the EMS that falls upon it, and secondly, the reflective property of that object. Certainly not the posturing bullshit you have suggested.
Still, I imagine that is why this is in pseudoscience.

I have a lot to learn , really? I experiment with light all the time, I even consider I may have an idea or two for a real holographic image , try that one.

Light is an easy subject, EM radiation is nothing to consider, yes I have an ego, that is because I know the subject very well.

 

[Dywyddyr]

Oh please, stop lying, white light is not a mixture of frequencies

Wrong.

only by interaction do you have a spectrum, honestly I got it from day one.

Then you obviously haven't "got it".

Lasers do not have any other content except the linearity of the beam

Whut?

I have experimented and you are wrong

No, all it means is that YOU have interpreted the "experiment" incorrectly.

I observe only an incident ray in the smoke , and do not observe Photons travelling through the smoke in the direction of your eyes

If there were no photons travelling toward your eyes you wouldn't see the beam.

I have a lot to learn , really?

Yes, really.

I experiment with light all the time

But you don't learn anything from it.

Light is an easy subject, EM radiation is nothing to consider

Both are apparently too difficult for you.

that is because I know the subject very well.
Utter bollocks.

 

[theorist-constant12345]

Wrong.


Then you obviously haven't "got it".


Whut?


No, all it means is that YOU have interpreted the "experiment" incorrectly.


If there were no photons travelling toward your eyes you wouldn't see the beam.


Yes, really.


But you don't learn anything from it.


Both are apparently too difficult for you.

dream on Duck, I will write this paper, and it will take the piss out of the naive science set theories in a way that shows the truth. it is obvious what happens, i do not particular care if you agree, I know I am correct. You have no idea what Einstein was thinking and telling you, it is has clear as day , I know i am correct, the exact details may be short, but the principle idea is logically sound. It is always dark, you just can not see it.

 

[AlexG]

Ego run wild coupled with almost total ignorance.

 

[theorist-constant12345]

Ego run wild coupled with almost total ignorance.

It is not me who is the ignorance, it is members who are ignorant, trying to preach the present information which I obviously know, and I am telling you it is simply wrong.
I am not accepting garbage from science, you want get your facts right and accurate and none of it is accurate and more on the lines of make believe, dreamed up in a time where the world must of been fools in desperation to succeed into the society of BS, and that is the truth.
You have all been scammed by history and live in an imaginary world that was made up and the true science was lost. I have read hundreds of articles on light,. and it does make me laugh that science can not see this.
It is really simple to see has well, you can not be this blind to reality surely?

LOOK, it is simple, turn the light off in an enclosed room, you do not add dark to the room, it is always there, light is the add on not the dark., but I can still see through the dark because a laser pen shows me a dot on the wall.

P.s you will say that is because it reflects into your eyes from the wall,

I will say bs, add smoke and there is no evidence of this.

 

[AlexG]

So you're right and EVERYONE else is wrong. A case of extreme megalomania.

 

[theorist-constant12345]

So you're right and EVERYONE else is wrong. A case of extreme megalomania.

Nice words there, but yes the entire world can only believe what they have learnt so why should they accept something?

They should accept the obvious axiom truth.

 

[origin]

LOOK, it is simple, turn the light off in an enclosed room, you do not add dark to the room, it is always there, light is the add on not the dark.,

Essentially correct. If there are no photons there will be darkness.

but I can still see through the dark because a laser pen shows me a dot on the wall.

You can call it 'seeing through the dark' if you want but it makes more sense to say you are simply seeing the photons that are reflected from the wall.

P.s you will say that is because it reflects into your eyes from the wall,

It would make sense to say that since that is what is happening.

I will say bs, add smoke and there is no evidence of this.

That is quite simply 100% WRONG. If smoke, dust or water vapor is put into the room the laser will reflect off of the particles and you will be able to see the beam.

Try it since you claim you like to experiment so much. Here is my hypothesis, if you set the laser on the table aimed at the wall with no dust in the air you will not see the beam, just the dot on the wall. Now bring into the room a tea pot and direct the steam to where you think the beam should be. I predict that you will see the beam. Since sight is simply incident photons hitting your retina that can only mean that the beam can be seen because light is being reflected from the particles into your eyes.

I really do not know why I try to help you, I fear it is hopeless...

 

[billvon]

Oh please, stop lying, white light is not a mixture of frequencies

That's been proven conclusively. You can make white light by combining many different wavelengths of light; you can then separate them back out. Blackbody radiation that appears white consists of a wide variety of wavelengths, which together create the perception of white light.

I have experimented and you are wrong, I observe only an incident ray in the smoke

You are seeing the reflection from the smoke.
If there is no smoke you will not see reflection and hence not see the beam. A laser beam in a vacuum is invisible.

and do not observe Photons travelling through the smoke in the direction of your eyes

If you can see ANYTHING it is because photons travel towards your eyes. That's how your eyes work - the retina responds to photons and sends a signal to your brain.

You really need to learn some basic physics and biology. You'll be happier in the long run.

 

[billvon]

Nice words there, but yes the entire world can only believe what they have learnt so why should they accept something? They should accept the obvious axiom truth.

They do - but you do not, for some reason. I hope you get enough control over your ego to learn how the world really works. You might find it interesting.

 

[krash661]

Nice words there, but yes the entire world can only believe what they have learnt so why should they accept something?
They should accept the obvious axiom truth.

it's referred to as experience. some of us does this for careers unlike some who just clinks on wikki and claims that the humanity's elite are the idiots. which is massively pathetic, with a touch of hilarious.

 

[paddoboy]

I have a lot to learn , really? I experiment with light all the time, I even consider I may have an idea or two for a real holographic image , try that one.

Light is an easy subject, EM radiation is nothing to consider, yes I have an ego, that is because I know the subject very well.

Nuts!!! Nuts!!! Nuts!!!!, Brazil nuts, Hazel nuts, Walnuts, Nuts, nuts, nuts!!!

Considering where your post is, I suggest you should really take a hold of yourself.

 

[theorist-constant12345]

Essentially correct. If there are no photons there will be darkness.

You can call it 'seeing through the dark' if you want but it makes more sense to say you are simply seeing the photons that are reflected from the wall.

It would make sense to say that since that is what is happening.

That is quite simply 100% WRONG. If smoke, dust or water vapor is put into the room the laser will reflect off of the particles and you will be able to see the beam.

Try it since you claim you like to experiment so much. Here is my hypothesis, if you set the laser on the table aimed at the wall with no dust in the air you will not see the beam, just the dot on the wall. Now bring into the room a tea pot and direct the steam to where you think the beam should be. I predict that you will see the beam. Since sight is simply incident photons hitting your retina that can only mean that the beam can be seen because light is being reflected from the particles into your eyes.

I really do not know why I try to help you, I fear it is hopeless...

What Photons that reflect from the wall?

Evidence - In a dark void we do not have enough intensity of the lasers incident beam to see the beam has a beam without the laser having the ability to propagate or reflect off any dust particles in the void, this is evidential.


However, we can always see the dot on the incident beams contact surface point, where the beam hits the surface causing effect.

If we add smoke to the room, creating a viscosity in the void, this allows the laser incident beam to propagate through the smoke in effect causing a greater intensity of the beam allowing enough change to allow us to see the beam.

In the first instant we see no incident beam and no reflective beam evidential.

In the second instant in the smoke filled void , we see a incident beam evidential, but we do not observe any reflective beam, evidential,

The reflective ray by the laws of Physics should show a reflective beam of reflective spread through the smoke if science had it correct, which it does not.


I can prove this by placing a mirror on the wall, and then indeed I observe a incident beam and a reflective beam, but in all reflective situations, I do not observe any beam or ''flickers'', Photons , passing through the smoke into my eyes.


Evidential and true and simple child science that shows you I am correct.



Einstein's constant creates a visual invisible constant of 3 dimensional space, and interactions within the constant are of a difference to the constant and a specified signature to sight called the spectrum allows you to see change in the constant of the constant which is processed by our brains seen has light in the dark constant as a constant. It is not me whom is behind in my science, it is I who has exceeded the teachers.

 

[Dywyddyr]

What a maroon.

 

[theorist-constant12345]

They do - but you do not, for some reason. I hope you get enough control over your ego to learn how the world really works. You might find it interesting.

The other way around..

 

[theorist-constant12345]

What a maroon.

Hello Dy God troll, how are you today? I cans see the great effort by your posts how serious you are about science. That is evidence, according to you I should see red speckles flashing through the smoke, this is not what we observe.

 

[origin]

What Photons that reflect from the wall?

The ones that enter your pupil.

Evidence - In a dark void we do not have enough intensity of the lasers incident beam to see the beam has a beam without the laser having the ability to propagate or reflect off any dust particles in the void, this is evidential.

It has nothing to do with the intensity, a laser that has the power to burn a hole in steel is invisible if the air is completely clear.

However, we can always see the dot on the incident beams contact surface point, where the beam hits the surface causing effect.

That effect is called reflection

If we add smoke to the room, creating a viscosity in the void, this allows the laser incident beam to propagate through the smoke in effect causing a greater intensity of the beam allowing enough change to allow us to see the beam.

The room is not a void it is filled with air and adding a small amount of smoke does nothing to the viscosity of the air. Changing the temperature of the air would have a much greater effect on the viscosity than adding smoke. The smoke however does reflect the laser beam.

In the first instant we see no incident beam and no reflective beam evidential.

If there is perfectly clear air we will not see the beam.

In the second instant in the smoke filled void , we see a incident beam evidential, but we do not observe any reflective beam, evidential,

In the smoke filled room we see the beam because the beam reflects off of the smoke particles

The reflective ray by the laws of Physics should show a reflective beam of reflective spread through the smoke if science had it correct, which it does not.

That is exactly what we see. The reflection from the beam is evident as well as secondary reflection from other smoke particles around the beam.

I can prove this by placing a mirror on the wall, and then indeed I observe a incident beam and a reflective beam, but in all reflective situations, I do not observe any beam or ''flickers'', Photons , passing through the smoke into my eyes.

I do not know what point you are trying to make with that comment.

Evidential and true and simple child science that shows you I am correct.

You are so wrong and confused on this that I am somewhat impressed that you can figure out how to use a computer.

Einstein's constant creates a visual invisible constant of 3 dimensional space, and interactions within the constant are of a difference to the constant and a specified signature to sight called the spectrum allows you to see change in the constant of the constant which is processed by our brains seen has light in the dark constant as a constant. It is not me whom is behind in my science, it is I who has exceeded the teachers.

Wow that is just sad. Does that gibberish really have any meaning to you.

 

[theorist-constant12345]

The ones that enter your pupil.


It has nothing to do with the intensity, a laser that has the power to burn a hole in steel is invisible if the air is completely clear.


That effect is called reflection


The room is not a void it is filled with air and adding a small amount of smoke does nothing to the viscosity of the air. Changing the temperature of the air would have a much greater effect on the viscosity than adding smoke. The smoke however does reflect the laser beam.


If there is perfectly clear air we will not see the beam.


In the smoke filled room we see the beam because the beam reflects off of the smoke particles


That is exactly what we see. The reflection from the beam is evident as well as secondary reflection from other smoke particles around the beam.


I do not know what point you are trying to make with that comment.


You are so wrong and confused on this that I am somewhat impressed that you can figure out how to use a computer.


Wow that is just sad. Does that gibberish really have any meaning to you.

I define a void and you add air? ok.

The Photons that enter your eyes, let me see, I add smoke I can see the beam of Photons passing through the smoke, I do not observe any Photons spreading through the smoke, a laser does not work that way. There is no reflection of the beam, or from off the beam, you are deluded not me, I have done several experiments and observe no reflective beam from the surface, if the surface reflected the beam we would see it the same has the incident beam, a mirror shows us this.
You are denying simplicity of the truth, it is more than obvious that I am correct, and for some reason science does not care but that does not surprise me because your heads are in the serious naive of science.

The obvious truth is dark is always there and not just the absent of light. It is more than an obvious axiom, and is easily proven by shadows , you block the ''light'' in the day time, this makes a shadow, a shadow is dark, a shadow is the origin of state behind the light, it is only by adding light that dark becomes visible and see through.
depending on intensity is the dependant of translucency of the dark to sight , hence a cloudy day today, it is really dull out, I can clearly see that the dark has more opaqueness than when there is more intensity of light, you know absolutely nothing in science, I challenge any of you mug heads because I am way ahead of you guys in my understanding of The theory of everything , because I simply understand reality and do not accept garbage.
I learnt , I read, I realised you are all wrong,

Put me in the bin, I do not care, it is not my loss if I quit science, it is a loss to science because I really do get it and understand it all, every single science subject I get, something clicked and I understood.

To be honest I am getting bored of getting nowhere and soon will quit, life is to short , it is not my fault you have all been such fools and actually believe all the garbage that is far from the actual truth.


Suit your selves and carry on living in your make believe world, I am telling the truth and will swear to the truth.

 

[krash661]

Suit your selves and carry on living in your make believe world,

you should take your own advice.