There is no funny in this, Einstein was said to be wrong about Photon electrical effect, I am saying he was right.
It is always dark, Light is an illusion and not a thing!
- Thread starter theorist-constant12345
- Start date
- Status
My single model shows all of this. Every interaction. Nothing left to chance, unlike Physics does. The word light was not even made by science, science accepted this without question, science agreed with the bible , I see some serious irony.
I meant the whole line was funny because it was a bunch of sciency words thrown together that did not make the slightest bit of sense.
Oh and by the way the term is photoelectric effect. Nobody with an education in science thinks the photoelectric effect is wrong. He won the Nobel Prize for that discovery.
Is this just more humor?
It says on wiki Einstein was proven to be wrong. And it is not word salad, you are making it word salad by not just simply reading it how it says it.
You do not understand my idea and you think there is something wrong with me, great powers of deduction, try from my view, nobody understands what to me seams really simple of an idea, with easy understanding. I have field tested my idea on several various people from several various walks of life, and 9/9 in agreement, says I am not mad or deranged.I am begining to think there is something seriously wrong with you.
It is you who can not understand me, not me not understanding you.
Really where exactly does it say that Einstein was wrong about the photoelectric effect (or as you call it the photon electrical effect
)?Wrong.
Last edited:
Sure I do. The problem is that it is completely wrong and developed out of your complete ignorance.
It is begining to look that way.
Simple deduction
I do not have enough drugs in the house.
As I have said your ideas are easy to understand, but they are just wrong.
That seems hard to believe since everyone that has replied to you here has said you are WRONG.
You certainly seem delusional about this!
Wrong, like everything else you have written.
''. However, the experimental results did not correlate with either of the two predictions made by this theoryReally where exactly does it say that Einstein was wrong about the photoelectric effect (or as you call it the photon electrical effect
Wrong.
Instead, as it turns out, electrons are only dislodged by the photoelectric effect if light reaches or exceeds a threshold frequency,''
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photoelectric_effect
You still insist my theory is wrong, yet you do not even understand the idea, so how on earth can you deem something is wrong if you do not understand the idea?
Neither as my theory been questioned, only has present information being provided, nothing you have said , alters my idea, or changes the alternative theory.
You have not even considered or questioned the theory, your mind is stuck on preaching present knowledge.
You suppose to look at an alternative theory on its own merit, without considering the present information, the present information I am giving an alternative too.
I know, I will just quote all present knowledge and call this an alternative theory.......hmmm let me think,,,,,
No, that just will not work by definition to alternative.
It is not me being stupid. I know what alternative means,
if you can not think for yourself, then do not post it is simple. upto yet in this thread, all i have seen is posts trying to get me banned for nothing. It is not my lack of ability to think. I can think about present information, and can agree with lots of that. I do not even disagree with present information of the nature of light , it works for me, but also so does my alternative idea.
Almost 20 pages, and still no conversation on the actual idea. I will start again,
If we could see in the dark, by having temporal night vision eyes, there is no way, we would be able to distinguish whether light was a thing, or we were just seeing in the dark?
I await the debate about the question and not await present information recited back to me.
If we could see in the dark, by having temporal night vision eyes, there is no way, we would be able to distinguish whether light was a thing, or we were just seeing in the dark?
I await the debate about the question and not await present information recited back to me.
I am not throwing away present information, but it is no good trying to preach that information, reciting back what I already know. If my idea can be dissuaded for the idea, by merits of the idea, then I will concede. But believe me, I have tried to dissuade my own idea, and I can not. It is logically correct, and also testable. That defines logic.
I am not mad, I want someone to prove me wrong. I want to be wrong, but the logic suggests otherwise.
an image IS NOT a model.
Right. But the interactions you predict do not occur. For example you predict that the "sky is less blue to the north." It is not. So your theory fails.
A simple theory that predicts things that do not happen might be a simple theory, but it is wrong. For example, I could predict that all matter is made of condensed light - and burning it releases that light. Simple, right? But since that theory is not reflected in reality, it fails.
One of the important things to realize about science is that we judge how good science is by how well it describes the natural world. A simple, elegant theory that describes the real world incorrectly is rejected. A complex theory that accurately describes the world (as validated in experiments) is accepted.
As most any photographer can tell you, the sky is bluer if the sun is behind you. Nothing to do with cardinal directions.
Certainly not.
I'm here to learn off reputable people, and to pass on what little I do know to those that know even less. I'm also here to refute nonsensical, fairy tale like alternative hypothesis, such as you have put, and which have got you banned from other forums, because they have no basis in reality, no evidence of any form to support them, and then have you lie about it claiming you do have evidence but are unable to present it...Another well known crank cop out.
Again, if you had anything of substance at all, you would be getting it peer reviewed.
But you really have nothing, despite your continuing ranting and claims that its just that the world does not understand.
In the real world we call that delusional brought about by delusions of grandeur due to an over inflated ego.
And also in the real world, as long as you continue to proceed here with your fairy tale nonsense, the more it becomes obvious that you are a troll.
- Status