Dave,
If you read the PDF that they have, that portion that deals with the dog is more clear. It is word-for-word with the web page, but formatting is different. In the PDF, he says that the dog is severely wounded. Then, in a new small paragraph, he states as an apparent aside that "later, Dr. Reed could find no trace of her..etc". Then, in a new paragraph following up, he says that the thing looked at him, then back at the dog. The formatting on the web page doesn't even put the aside paragraph by itself, and just lumps it in with everything else, thus making it look like a part of the sequential events. I think this discrepancy is more a matter of putting an aside in the middle of the sequential events, when it really could have been better put somewhere else. Along with that, the change of formatting that combined the aside portion with the sequential events paragraph. Mind you, that still doesn't prove he is not a kook
As far as the brain bust, followed by a nice glass of water, well, that certainly is screwed up. In interview, he said that he was shocked by that as well. He says that he stuffed it in his fridge to prevent decay of the body since it was dead. Some days (forget how long) later, he opens the freezer and the thing screams at him. He later states that his assumption is that the suit it was wearing may have been involved in the recovery, but re-states that is just conjecture.
In regards to the obelisk thing, I didn't see any mention of him falling into, or getting access to the inside of it. Where did you see that ?
I have to say, those pictures on the site do look pretty fake, but apparently his story says that he took a lot of video of the event when it originally happened. In interview, he says he will eventually release the video footage in one manner or another (though, to get $$$ likely). Maybe he doesn't really have video, and is still in the casting/filming stage
This is one story that I would like to find out if it is fake or not, cause the stuff presented in its entirety is very compelling.
[This message has been edited by Doood (edited January 16, 2000).]