Is there a medium "in space", a medium "of space", neither, or both?

[quantum_wave]

You don't need another level. You just have to correctly understand what entanglement means.

I'll work on it. Let me go back and do some more research. But even if we were to agree that the information you say entangled particles have is functionally the same as the information I say they have, we still have the Big Bang arenas vs. the Big Ongoing . I don't mind having a personal model that satisfies me better than yours, and I hope you feel the same.

 

[cav755]

I'll work on it. Let me go back and do some more research. But even if we were to agree that the information you say entangled particles have is functionally the same as the information I say they have, we still have the Big Bang arenas vs. the Big Ongoing . I don't mind having a personal model that satisfies me better than yours, and I hope you feel the same.

It's just a matter of stuff being more or less correct.

There should be no right and wrong in science.

The Earth rotating on its axis and orbiting the Sun isn't right. It's just the most correct explanation we have to date.

 

[quantum_wave]

It's just a matter of stuff being more or less correct.

There should be no right and wrong in science.

The Earth rotating on its axis and orbiting the Sun isn't right. It's just the most correct explanation we have to date.

Yes, that is essentially true when you get right down to it. Too bad some members will employ any means of disparagement to cover up that fact, though they never seem to make that fact go away. I think I have found out a little about what members think in regard to the "medium of space", and I'm glad to have gotten into some of the details of your thinking, as well as the thinking of a few others who participated.