Is there a medium "in space", a medium "of space", neither, or both?

Aether has mass.
Alright, do me a favor. Post the scientific definition of mass, and then your definition of mass, so that I can see the difference in how you define mass.
Mass from Aether is displaced by the particles of matter which exist in it and move through it.
I can understand the concept. What causes particles of matter to form or exist in the aether? Was there a beginning or not? Discuss.
Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity.

The state of displacement of the aether is gravity.
Fine. Can you do the same thing with the definition of "particles of matter". Generally, we are talking about aspects of the cosmology of the universe, and when you say matter or particles exist, do you have any scenario of how they came to exist, and the mechanics of how they move relative to each other through the aether. Displaced aether must have some "push back" to it, and yet you don't seem to call that variable density? Why not?
A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit and the associated wave in the aether passes through both.
Of course, and under your scenario it is a neat way to describe the wave nature of particles as associated aether displacement waves. I'm trying to relate what you say to the OP definition. We have to have some compression of the aether, i.e. some density that can vary with the passing of the particles, or don't we?
 
My goodness this sound very familiar, are you related to Pincho Paxton?
God, origin. You are so rude. On a scientific forum, one is expected to build a scientific case toward an accusation of identity. Accusing people willy-nilly leaves you as the bad guy.

It's obviously Mike Cavedon (or a plagiarist). It might be mpc755 (banned on 2011年10月07日 by James R). It might be gravitational_aether (banned on 2012年21月12日 by James R).

Compare: [post=3172421]post #24[/post] and [post=3172446]post #26[/post] to http://www.quora.com/Physics/What-is-gravity-made-of/answer/Mike-Cavedon/comment/3307249
Compare: [post=3172457]post #28[/post] and http://www.quora.com/Albert-Einstei...hen-he-said-it-was-curved/answer/Mike-Cavedon
Compare: [post=3172466]post #30[/post] (where it is not repetitive of post #24) and http://www.quora.com/Physics/Can-dark-matter-be-in-fact-ether/answer/Mike-Cavedon/comment/2746845
Compare: [post=3172539]post#33[/post] and http://www.quora.com/Theoretical-Ph...imensions/answer/Mike-Cavedon/comment/2852448

Likewise see mpc755 on Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/user/mpc755
Likewise see ideal_fluid on Physics Forums: http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=670758
Likewise see gravitational_aether on TOE Quest: http://www.toequest.com/forum/your-toe-theory/6579-aether-displacement-27.html
 
"That seems mostly reasonable and compatible with the definition of "medium" in the OP, but I do take exception to the concept that time stops. The way I characterize it is that we measure the passing of time on a clock, and clocks are composed of particles. As the clock (and its particles) approaches a massive object like a black hole, the particles slow to a stop as they cease to function properly, and so the measurement of time passing stops, but time itself is not a physical thing that can stop."

Yes, I agree with you here because I, too, believe that time is merely a measurement of the physical components of the universe. Sometimes I find myself saying things I don't actually mean, which is not very scientific, I know!

"Yes, we essentially agree. Would you define in more detail the phrase "nodal form" as you use it in that context?"

Not much time on my hands at the moment but essentially I believe that energy and information propagates, and is transferred, across space via changes which are triggered on the basis of sequential events (no time required). These changes, or events, just happen and they happen because the ether-like substance carries the change events as discrete packets which flow and trigger adjacent events. Basically, each triggered event would be a discrete energy transfer at a point in space which I referred to as a node. Where the nodes are variable, the energy transfer would take the easiest path. This is why light bends in the vicinity of warped space, it's simply taking the path of least resistance through the nodal soup. It might sound farfetched but I'm confident that an as-yet undetected aether-like substance is responsible for energy transfer as well as gravity.
 
Alright, do me a favor. Post the scientific definition of mass, and then your definition of mass, so that I can see the difference in how you define mass.

Mass is defined as that which physically occupies three dimensional space. Aether physically occupies three dimensional space. Aether has mass.

I can understand the concept. What causes particles of matter to form or exist in the aether? Was there a beginning or not? Discuss.

The polarization discovered by the BICEP2 telescope is caused by our Universal jet spinning about a preferred axis.

'Was the universe born spinning?'
physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/46688

"The universe was born spinning and continues to do so around a preferred axis"

Our Universe spins around a preferred axis because it is a larger version of a polar jet (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polar_jet). Our Universe was not just born spinning, our Universe continues to spin.

It's not this:

qph.is.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-e90d409e7abe3292df10d117fe2f6c14

It's this:

qph.is.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-1ff569569794b13b68b73e6ed8a51ab8

Our Universe is a larger version of a polar jet.

It's not the Big Bang; it's the Big Ongoing.

Dark energy is the evaporated matter (i.e. aether) which is continually being emitted into the Universal jet.

In the images, where 1st stars is, is where the pressure caused by the aether continually being emitted into the Universal jet causes the aether to condense into particles of matter.

Fine. Can you do the same thing with the definition of "particles of matter". Generally, we are talking about aspects of the cosmology of the universe, and when you say matter or particles exist, do you have any scenario of how they came to exist, and the mechanics of how they move relative to each other through the aether. Displaced aether must have some "push back" to it, and yet you don't seem to call that variable density? Why not?

Water does not have a variable density. When you take a bowling ball out of a swimming pool the water fills in where the bowling ball had been. This is evidence the water was pushing back against the bowling ball. The water is a liquid. The aether is, or behaves similar to, a supersolid.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casimir_effect#Vacuum_energy

a "field" in physics may be envisioned as if space were filled with interconnected vibrating balls and springs, and the strength of the field can be visualized as the displacement of a ball from its rest position

A "field" in physics is space were filled with aether, and the strength of the field is the displacement of the aether from its relativistic rest position.

The further from the point of displacement you get in a supersolid the less the supersolid is displaced the less the supersolid pushes back and exerts pressure toward the displacement.

I don't think you would describe a supersolid as having a variable density, correct?

Of course, and under your scenario it is a neat way to describe the wave nature of particles as associated aether displacement waves. I'm trying to relate what you say to the OP definition. We have to have some compression of the aether, i.e. some density that can vary with the passing of the particles, or don't we?

No, we don't. The aether is or behaves similar to a supersolid.

You are in a bowling alley filled with a supersolid. You roll the bowling ball. The bowling ball displaces the supersolid. As the supersolid fills-in where the bowling ball had been the supersolid displaces the bowling ball. By definition, the bowling ball rolls forever through the supersolid.

Q. Is the bowling ball displacing the supersolid or is the supersolid displacing the bowling ball?
A. Both are occurring simultaneously with equal force.
 
The polarization discovered by the BICEP2 telescope is caused by our Universal jet spinning about a preferred axis.
Spoken like someone who has no ability at all to read the BICEP2 results and expects the reader to share his inability.

BICEP2 is discussed in [thread=141090]Gravitational waves: have US scientists heard echoes of the big bang?[/thread] and [thread=141109]Next year's Nobel Prize, you heard it here first, Lambda CDM Inflation Prediction.[/thread].
 
Mass is defined as that which physically occupies three dimensional space. Aether physically occupies three dimensional space. Aether has mass.



The polarization discovered by the BICEP2 telescope is caused by our Universal jet spinning about a preferred axis.

'Was the universe born spinning?'
physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/46688

"The universe was born spinning and continues to do so around a preferred axis"

Our Universe spins around a preferred axis because it is a larger version of a polar jet (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polar_jet). Our Universe was not just born spinning, our Universe continues to spin.

It's not this:

qph.is.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-e90d409e7abe3292df10d117fe2f6c14

It's this:

qph.is.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-1ff569569794b13b68b73e6ed8a51ab8

Our Universe is a larger version of a polar jet.

It's not the Big Bang; it's the Big Ongoing.

Dark energy is the evaporated matter (i.e. aether) which is continually being emitted into the Universal jet.

In the images, where 1st stars is, is where the pressure caused by the aether continually being emitted into the Universal jet causes the aether to condense into particles of matter.



Water does not have a variable density. When you take a bowling ball out of a swimming pool the water fills in where the bowling ball had been. This is evidence the water was pushing back against the bowling ball. The water is a liquid. The aether is, or behaves similar to, a supersolid.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casimir_effect#Vacuum_energy

a "field" in physics may be envisioned as if space were filled with interconnected vibrating balls and springs, and the strength of the field can be visualized as the displacement of a ball from its rest position

A "field" in physics is space were filled with aether, and the strength of the field is the displacement of the aether from its relativistic rest position.

The further from the point of displacement you get in a supersolid the less the supersolid is displaced the less the supersolid pushes back and exerts pressure toward the displacement.

I don't think you would describe a supersolid as having a variable density, correct?



No, we don't. The aether is or behaves similar to a supersolid.
I'm not sure why not, but I will have to research it a bit.
You are in a bowling alley filled with a supersolid. You roll the bowling ball. The bowling ball displaces the supersolid. As the supersolid fills-in where the bowling ball had been the supersolid displaces the bowling ball. By definition, the bowling ball rolls forever through the supersolid.

Q. Is the bowling ball displacing the supersolid or is the supersolid displacing the bowling ball?
A. Both are occurring simultaneously with equal force.
Nicely done, Gav755. Where do you want to take this. Is just saying it, and having it as your personaal view of the cosmology of the universe satisfying to you? Or do you want some layman level peer review, or what?
 
Spoken like someone who has no ability at all to read the BICEP2 results and expects the reader to share his inability.

BICEP2 is discussed in [thread=141090]Gravitational waves: have US scientists heard echoes of the big bang?[/thread] and [thread=141109]Next year's Nobel Prize, you heard it here first, Lambda CDM Inflation Prediction.[/thread].

Yes, I realize what BICEP2 has detected is being mistaken for evidence of inflationary theory. I'm pointing out that there are issues with inflationary theory and what BICEP2 detected is evidence of our Universal jet.

'The Inflation Debate'
scientificamerican.com/article/the-inflation-summer/

"Cosmic inflation is so widely accepted that it is often taken as established fact. The idea is that the geometry and uniformity of the cosmos were established during an intense early growth spurt. But some of the theory’s creators, including the author, are having second thoughts. As the original theory has developed, cracks have appeared in its logical foundations. Highly improbable conditions are required to start inflation. Worse, inflation goes on eternally, producing infinitely many outcomes, so the theory makes no firm observational predictions. Scientists debate among (and within) themselves whether these troubles are teething pains or signs of a deeper rot. Various proposals are circulating for ways to fix inflation or replace it."

'Stanford University -- Dept. of Physics -- Andrei Linde'
stanford.edu/~alinde/

"Recent versions of inflationary theory assert that instead of being a single, expanding ball of fire described by the big bang theory, the universe looks like a huge growing fractal. It consists of many inflating balls that produce new balls, which in turn produce more new balls, ad infinitum. Therefore the evolution of the universe has no end and may have no beginning. After inflation the universe becomes divided into different exponentially large domains inside which properties of elementary particles and even dimension of space-time may be different. Thus the universe looks like a multiverse consisting of many universes with different laws of low-energy physics operating in each of them."

Whenever a physicists uses infinity to explain a theory, as in "ad infinitum', they are just making stuff up. It's untestable. Andri is starting to realize the Universe has no end and no beginning.

The polarization discovered by the BICEP2 telescope is caused by our Universal jet spinning about a preferred axis.

'Was the universe born spinning?'
physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/46688

"The universe was born spinning and continues to do so around a preferred axis"

Our Universe spins around a preferred axis because it is a larger version of a polar jet (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polar_jet). Our Universe was not just born spinning, our Universe continues to spin.

It's not this:

qph.is.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-e90d409e7abe3292df10d117fe2f6c14

It's this:

qph.is.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-1ff569569794b13b68b73e6ed8a51ab8

Our Universe is a larger version of a polar jet.

It's not the Big Bang; it's the Big Ongoing.

Dark energy is the evaporated matter (i.e. aether) which is continually being emitted into the Universal jet.
 
I'm not sure why not, but I will have to research it a bit.Nicely done, Gav755. Where do you want to take this. Is just saying it, and having it as your personaal view of the cosmology of the universe satisfying to you? Or do you want some layman level peer review, or what?

I would like the following correct explanation as to what occurs physically in nature to be generally understood.

'[1305.5759] Comment on higher derivative Lagrangians in relativistic theory'
arxiv.org/abs/1305.5759

"The relativistic theory of an Aether was discussed several time, see for e.g. [8], [9]. In this paper, our hypothesis is different and gives a relativistic theory of the deformation of continuous media (for which the geometry is described by the metric field)."

The Milky Way's halo is the deformation of continuous media.

The Milky Way's halo is the state of displacement of the aether.

What is referred to as the curvature of spacetime physically exists in nature as the state of displacement of the aether.

The pseudo-force associated with curved spacetime is the force associated with the displaced aether.

The following article describes the aether as that which produces resistance to acceleration and is responsible for the increase in mass of an object with velocity and describes the "space-time ideal fluid approach from general relativity."

'On parallels between electromagnetic and fluidic inertia'
arxiv.org/abs/1202.4611

"It is shown that the force exerted on a particle by an ideal fluid produces two effects: i) resistance to acceleration and, ii) an increase of mass with velocity. ... The interaction between the particle and the entrained space flow gives rise to the observed properties of inertia and the relativistic increase of mass. ... Accordingly, in this framework the non resistance of a particle in uniform motion through an ideal fluid (D’Alembert’s paradox) corresponds to Newton’s first law. The law of inertia suggests that the physical vacuum can be modeled as an ideal fluid, agreeing with the space-time ideal fluid approach from general relativity."[/i

The relativistic mass of an object is the mass of the object and the mass of the aether connected to and neighboring the object which is displaced by the object. The faster an object moves with respect to the state of the aether in which it exists the greater the displacement of the aether by the object the greater the relativistic mass of the object.

'Interpretation of quantum mechanics by the double solution theory - Louis de BROGLIE'
aflb.ensmp.fr/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf

“When in 1923-1924 I had my first ideas about Wave Mechanics I was looking for a truly concrete physical image, valid for all particles, of the wave and particle coexistence discovered by Albert Einstein in his "Theory of light quanta". I had no doubt whatsoever about the physical reality of waves and particles.”

“any particle, even isolated, has to be imagined as in continuous “energetic contact” with a hidden medium”

The hidden medium of de Broglie wave mechanics is the aether. The “energetic contact” is the state of displacement of the aether.

"For me, the particle, precisely located in space at every instant, forms on the v wave a small region of high energy concentration, which may be likened in a first approximation, to a moving singularity."

A particle is a moving singularity which has an associated aether displacement wave.

In a double slit experiment the particle travels a well defined path which takes it through one slit. The associated wave in the aether passes through both. As the aether wave exits the slits it creates wave interference. As the particle exits a single slit the direction it travels is altered by the wave interference. This is the wave piloting the particle of pilot-wave theory. Detecting the particle strongly exiting a single slit destroys the cohesion between the particle and its associated wave in the aether.

'Hubble Finds Ghostly Ring of Dark Matter'
nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/news/dark_matter_ring_feature.html

"Astronomers using NASA's Hubble Space Telescope got a first-hand view of how dark matter behaves during a titanic collision between two galaxy clusters. The wreck created a ripple of dark mater, which is somewhat similar to a ripple formed in a pond when a rock hits the water."

The 'pond' consists of aether.

The ripple is an aether displacement wave.

The ripple is a gravitational wave.

I would like it to be generally and correctly understood that what ripples when galaxy clusters collide is what waves in a double slit experiment; the aether.

I would like it to be generally and correctly understood that Einstein's gravitational wave is de Broglie's wave of wave-particle duality and that both are waves in the aether.
 
Yes, I realize what BICEP2 has detected is being mistaken for evidence of inflationary theory...

The polarization discovered by the BICEP2 telescope is caused by our Universal jet spinning about a preferred axis.

Putting those two statements into one post, let alone separate posts, seems to undercut any possible credibility you might have been looking for.

You have shown no reasonable evidence that you understand the content of the paper referenced in the first sentence...

And you have cited no reference, predicting or explaining, the conclusion presented in the second.
 
Putting those two statements into one post, let alone separate posts, seems to undercut any possible credibility you might have been looking for.

You have shown no reasonable evidence that you understand the content of the paper referenced in the first sentence...

And you have cited no reference, predicting or explaining, the conclusion presented in the second.

'Cosmic microwave background'
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_microwave_background_radiation#Low_multipoles_and_other_anomalies

"With the increasingly precise data provided by WMAP, there have been a number of claims that the CMB exhibits anomalies, such as very large scale anisotropies, anomalous alignments, and non-Gaussian distributions. ... A number of groups have suggested that this could be the signature of new physics at the greatest observable scales"

The new physics is understanding our Universe is a larger version of a polar jet (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polar_jet).

'Cosmos may be curved, scientists say'
foxnews.com/science/2013/09/12/cosmos-may-be-curved-scientists-say/?intcmp=features

"Now cosmologists suggest these anomalies occur because the universe is not flat. Instead, these researchers propose the universe may be ever so slightly "open," curved in such a way that parallel lines, which never converge or diverge when traveling on a flat surface, will eventually diverge from one another, like on a saddle."

Our Universe is open because it is a larger version of a polar jet.

'Was the universe born spinning?'
physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/46688

"The universe was born spinning and continues to do so around a preferred axis"

Our Universe spins around a preferred axis because it is a larger version of a polar jet.

'Mysterious Cosmic 'Dark Flow' Tracked Deeper into Universe'
nasa.gov/centers/goddard/news/releases/2010/10-023.html

"The clusters appear to be moving along a line extending from our solar system toward Centaurus/Hydra, but the direction of this motion is less certain. Evidence indicates that the clusters are headed outward along this path, away from Earth, but the team cannot yet rule out the opposite flow. "We detect motion along this axis, but right now our data cannot state as strongly as we'd like whether the clusters are coming or going," Kashlinsky said."

The clusters are headed along this path because our Universe is a larger version of a polar jet.

Dark energy is evaporated matter (i.e. aether) continually being emitted into the Universal jet.

We are moving outward and away from the Universal jet emission point in three dimensional space.

It's not the Big Bang; it's the Big Ongoing.
 
Nicely done, Gav755. Where do you want to take this. Is just saying it, and having it as your personaal view of the cosmology of the universe satisfying to you? Or do you want some layman level peer review, or what?

Interpretation of quantum mechanics by the double solution theory - Louis de BROGLIE'
aflb.ensmp.fr/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf

“When in 1923-1924 I had my first ideas about Wave Mechanics I was looking for a truly concrete physical image, valid for all particles, of the wave and particle coexistence discovered by Albert Einstein in his "Theory of light quanta". I had no doubt whatsoever about the physical reality of waves and particles.”

“any particle, even isolated, has to be imagined as in continuous “energetic contact” with a hidden medium”

The hidden medium of de Broglie wave mechanics is the aether. The “energetic contact” is the state of displacement of the aether.

"For me, the particle, precisely located in space at every instant, forms on the v wave a small region of high energy concentration, which may be likened in a first approximation, to a moving singularity."

A particle is a moving singularity which has an associated aether displacement wave.

In a double slit experiment the particle travels a well defined path which takes it through one slit. The associated wave in the aether passes through both. As the aether wave exits the slits it creates wave interference. As the particle exits a single slit the direction it travels is altered by the wave interference. This is the wave piloting the particle of pilot-wave theory. Detecting the particle strongly exiting a single slit destroys the coherence between the particle and its associated wave in the aether and the particle continues on the trajectory it was traveling.

In a boat double slit experiment the boat always travels through a single slit and the bow wave passes through both.

The boat travels through a single slit and the bow wave passes through both whether you detect the boat or not.

The bow wave is the boat's water displacement wave.

In a double slit experiment the particle always travels through a single slit and the associated aether displacement wave passes through both.

The particle travels through a single slit and the associated aether displacement wave passes through both whether you detect the particle or not.

'New 'Double Slit' Experiment Skirts Uncertainty Principle'
scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=new-double-slit-experiment-skirts-uncertainty-principle

"Intriguingly, the trajectories closely match those predicted by an unconventional interpretation of quantum mechanics known as pilot-wave theory, in which each particle has a well-defined trajectory that takes it through one slit while the associated wave passes through both slits."

'Team 'sneaks around' quantum rule'
bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-13626587

"For his part, Professor Steinberg believes that the result reduces a limitation not on quantum physics but on physicists themselves. "I feel like we're starting to pull back a veil on what nature really is," he said. "The trouble with quantum mechanics is that while we've learned to calculate the outcomes of all sorts of experiments, we've lost much of our ability to describe what is really happening in any natural language. I think that this has really hampered our ability to make progress, to come up with new ideas and see intuitively how new systems ought to behave."

Seeing intuitively how a double slit experiment behaves is understanding the particle always travels through a single slit and the associated wave in the aether passes through both.

'Hubble Finds Ghostly Ring of Dark Matter'
nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/news/dark_matter_ring_feature.html

"Astronomers using NASA's Hubble Space Telescope got a first-hand view of how dark matter behaves during a titanic collision between two galaxy clusters. The wreck created a ripple of dark mater, which is somewhat similar to a ripple formed in a pond when a rock hits the water."

The 'pond' consists of aether.

The ripple is an aether displacement wave.

The ripple is a gravitational wave.

'[1305.5759] Comment on higher derivative Lagrangians in relativistic theory'
arxiv.org/abs/1305.5759

"The relativistic theory of an Aether was discussed several time, see for e.g. [8], [9]. In this paper, our hypothesis is different and gives a relativistic theory of the deformation of continuous media (for which the geometry is described by the metric field)."

The Milky Way's halo is the deformation of continuous media.

The Milky Way's halo is curved spacetime.

The Milky Way's halo is evidence of the correctness of relativity.

The Milky Way's halo is the state of displacement of the aether.

'On parallels between electromagnetic and fluidic inertia'
arxiv.org/abs/1202.4611

"It is shown that the force exerted on a particle by an ideal fluid produces two effects: i) resistance to acceleration and, ii) an increase of mass with velocity. ... The interaction between the particle and the entrained space flow gives rise to the observed properties of inertia and the relativistic increase of mass. ... Accordingly, in this framework the non resistance of a particle in uniform motion through an ideal fluid (D’Alembert’s paradox) corresponds to Newton’s first law. The law of inertia suggests that the physical vacuum can be modeled as an ideal fluid, agreeing with the space-time ideal fluid approach from general relativity."

The relativistic mass of an object is the mass of the object and the mass of the aether connected to and neighboring the object which is displaced by the object. The faster an object moves with respect to the state of the aether in which it exists the greater the displacement of the aether by the object the greater the relativistic mass of the object.

The relativistic mass of the Milky Way is the mass of the Milky Way and the mass of the aether connected to and neighboring the Milky Way which is displaced by the matter the Milky Way consists of.

The relativistic mass of the Milky Way accounts for the speed at which the matter in the Milky Way moves.

The Milky Way's halo is what is referred to as the curvature of spacetime.

The Milky Way's halo is the state of displacement of the aether.

The geometrical representation of gravity as curved spacetime physically exists in nature as the state of displacement of the aether.

The pseudo-force of curved spacetime physically exists in nature as the force associated with the displaced aether.

Most of the nonsense associated with mainstream physics goes away when you correctly understand aether has mass and is displaced by the particles of matter which exist in it and move through it.

I would like mainstream physics to understand aether has mass and is displaced by the particles of matter which exist in it and move through because it is the most correct explanation as to what occurs physically in nature.
 
Nicely done, Gav755. Where do you want to take this. Is just saying it, and having it as your personaal view of the cosmology of the universe satisfying to you? Or do you want some layman level peer review, or what?

I would like mainstream physics to correctly understand aether has mass and is displaced by the particles of matter which exist in it and move through it.

Einstein's gravitational wave is de Broglie's wave of wave-particle duality; both are waves in the aether.

What ripples when galaxy clusters collide is what waves in a double slit experiment; the aether.

'[1305.5759] Comment on higher derivative Lagrangians in relativistic theory'
arxiv.org/abs/1305.5759

"The relativistic theory of an Aether was discussed several time, see for e.g. [8], [9]. In this paper, our hypothesis is different and gives a relativistic theory of the deformation of continuous media (for which the geometry is described by the metric field)."

The Milky Way's halo is the deformation of continuous media.

The Milky Way's halo is curved spacetime.

The Milky Way's halo is evidence of the correctness of relativity.

The Milky Way's halo is the state of displacement of the aether.

'On parallels between electromagnetic and fluidic inertia'
arxiv.org/abs/1202.4611

"It is shown that the force exerted on a particle by an ideal fluid produces two effects: i) resistance to acceleration and, ii) an increase of mass with velocity. ... The interaction between the particle and the entrained space flow gives rise to the observed properties of inertia and the relativistic increase of mass. ... Accordingly, in this framework the non resistance of a particle in uniform motion through an ideal fluid (D’Alembert’s paradox) corresponds to Newton’s first law. The law of inertia suggests that the physical vacuum can be modeled as an ideal fluid, agreeing with the space-time ideal fluid approach from general relativity."

The relativistic mass of an object is the mass of the object and the mass of the aether connected to and neighboring the object which is displaced by the object. The faster an object moves with respect to the state of the aether in which it exists the greater the displacement of the aether by the object the greater the relativistic mass of the object.

The relativistic mass of the Milky Way is the mass of the Milky Way and the mass of the aether connected to and neighboring the Milky Way which is displaced by the matter the Milky Way consists of.

The relativistic mass of the Milky Way accounts for the speed at which the matter in the Milky Way moves.

The Milky Way's halo is what is referred to as the curvature of spacetime.

The Milky Way's halo is the state of displacement of the aether.

The geometrical representation of gravity as curved spacetime physically exists in nature as the state of displacement of the aether.

The pseudo-force of curved spacetime physically exists in nature as the force associated with the displaced aether.

I would like mainstream physics to correctly understand there is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter anchored to matter. Matter moves through and displaces the aether.

I would like mainstream physics to correctly understand the Milky Way's halo is the state of displacement of the aether.

I would like mainstream physics to correctly understand the following.

'Galactic Pile-Up May Point to Mysterious New Dark Force in the Universe'
wired.com/wiredscience/2013/01/musket-ball-dark-force/

"The reason this is strange is that dark matter is thought to barely interact with itself. The dark matter should just coast through itself and move at the same speed as the hardly interacting galaxies. Instead, it looks like the dark matter is crashing into something — perhaps itself – and slowing down faster than the galaxies are. But this would require the dark matter to be able to interact with itself in a completely new an unexpected way, a “dark force” that affects only dark matter."

It's not a new force. It's the aether displaced by each of the galaxy clusters interacting analogous to the bow waves of two boats which pass by each other.

'Offset between dark matter and ordinary matter: evidence from a sample of 38 lensing clusters of galaxies'
arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1004/1004.1475v1.pdf

"Our data strongly support the idea that the gravitational potential in clusters is mainly due to a non-baryonic fluid, and any exotic field in gravitational theory must resemble that of CDM fields very closely."

The offset is due to the galaxy clusters moving through the aether. The analogy is a submarine moving through the water. You are under water. Two miles away from you are many lights. Moving between you and the lights one mile away is a submarine. The submarine displaces the water. The state of displacement of the water causes the center of the lensing of the light propagating through the water to be offset from the center of the submarine itself. The offset between the center of the lensing of the light propagating through the water displaced by the submarine and the center of the submarine itself is going to remain the same as the submarine moves through the water. The submarine continually displaces different regions of the water. The state of the water connected to and neighboring the submarine remains the same as the submarine moves through the water even though it is not the same water the submarine continually displaces. This is what is occurring physically in nature as the galaxy clusters move through and displace the aether.

'The Milky Way's dark matter halo appears to be lopsided'
arxiv.org/abs/0903.3802

The Milky Way's 'dark matter halo' is lopsided due to the matter in the Milky Way moving through and displacing the aether.
 
'Cosmic microwave background'
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_microwave_background_radiation#Low_multipoles_and_other_anomalies

"With the increasingly precise data provided by WMAP, there have been a number of claims that the CMB exhibits anomalies, such as very large scale anisotropies, anomalous alignments, and non-Gaussian distributions. ... A number of groups have suggested that this could be the signature of new physics at the greatest observable scales"

The new physics is understanding our Universe is a larger version of a polar jet (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polar_jet).

'Cosmos may be curved, scientists say'
foxnews.com/science/2013/09/12/cosmos-may-be-curved-scientists-say/?intcmp=features

"Now cosmologists suggest these anomalies occur because the universe is not flat. Instead, these researchers propose the universe may be ever so slightly "open," curved in such a way that parallel lines, which never converge or diverge when traveling on a flat surface, will eventually diverge from one another, like on a saddle."

Our Universe is open because it is a larger version of a polar jet.

'Was the universe born spinning?
physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/46688

"The universe was born spinning and continues to do so around a preferred axis"

Our Universe spins around a preferred axis because it is a larger version of a polar jet.

'Mysterious Cosmic 'Dark Flow' Tracked Deeper into Universe'
nasa.gov/centers/goddard/news/releases/2010/10-023.html

"The clusters appear to be moving along a line extending from our solar system toward Centaurus/Hydra, but the direction of this motion is less certain. Evidence indicates that the clusters are headed outward along this path, away from Earth, but the team cannot yet rule out the opposite flow. "We detect motion along this axis, but right now our data cannot state as strongly as we'd like whether the clusters are coming or going," Kashlinsky said."

The clusters are headed along this path because our Universe is a larger version of a polar jet.

Dark energy is evaporated matter (i.e. aether) continually being emitted into the Universal jet.

We are moving outward and away from the Universal jet emission point in three dimensional space.

It's not the Big Bang; it's the Big Ongoing.

Nothing above explains why the BICEP2 conclusions are wrong or how you arrive at any conclusion that the data presented in the BICEP2 paper, was previously predicted by your claimed existence of any universal jet or even explained after the fact by a universal jet.

I have no issue with out of the box thinking. I do enough of that myself. But just saying something is so, does not make it so. Yes, if you repeat something long enough you will begin to believe it, but believing is not the same as having scientifically supported conclusions.
 
Nothing above explains why the BICEP2 conclusions are wrong or how you arrive at any conclusion that the data presented in the BICEP2 paper, was previously predicted by your claimed existence of any universal jet or even explained after the fact by a universal jet.

I have no issue with out of the box thinking. I do enough of that myself. But just saying something is so, does not make it so. Yes, if you repeat something long enough you will begin to believe it, but believing is not the same as having scientifically supported conclusions.

I'm not saying the BICEP2 conclusions are incorrect. I'm saying the notion of big bang/inflationary cosmology is incorrect.

All of the evidence is evidence we are in a larger version of a polar jet.

It's not this:

qph.is.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-e90d409e7abe3292df10d117fe2f6c14

It's this:

qph.is.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-1ff569569794b13b68b73e6ed8a51ab8

A physicist is standing on a bridge that spans a river that empties into a lake. On the side of the bridge opposite the lake the physicist drops in a bunch of floats. The physicist runs to the other side of the bridge to see the floats move away from one another as they empty into the lake. The physicist insists the only plausible explanation is that there was a big bang under the bridge.

Just because the physicist insists the only plausible explanation for the floats moving away from one another is that there was a big bang under the bridge doesn't make it so.
 
I would like mainstream physics to correctly understand aether has mass and is displaced by the particles of matter which exist in it and move through it.
"Mainstream Physics" is a moving target which I refer to it as "the consensus of the scientific community". It is fairly fluid, and generally changes at the rate of the development of new instruments and new discoveries. If your view of the universe is right, then you will see the "mainstream" or consensus move toward your views as our ability to observe and understand developes.

What time frame do you have in mind, :).
 
"Mainstream Physics" is a moving target which I refer to it as "the consensus of the scientific community". It is fairly fluid, and generally changes at the rate of the development of new instruments and new discoveries. If your view of the universe is right, then you will see the "mainstream" or consensus move toward your views as our ability to observe and understand developes.

What time frame do you have in mind, :).

Since not only is mainstream physics in denial of aether they appear to never be willing to understand it has mass and is displaced by the particles of matter which exist in it and move through it, so the timeframe is most likely generations.

'New 'Double Slit' Experiment Skirts Uncertainty Principle'
scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=new-double-slit-experiment-skirts-uncertainty-principle

"Intriguingly, the trajectories closely match those predicted by an unconventional interpretation of quantum mechanics known as pilot-wave theory, in which each particle has a well-defined trajectory that takes it through one slit while the associated wave passes through both slits."

'Team 'sneaks around' quantum rule'
bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-13626587

"For his part, Professor Steinberg believes that the result reduces a limitation not on quantum physics but on physicists themselves. "I feel like we're starting to pull back a veil on what nature really is," he said. "The trouble with quantum mechanics is that while we've learned to calculate the outcomes of all sorts of experiments, we've lost much of our ability to describe what is really happening in any natural language. I think that this has really hampered our ability to make progress, to come up with new ideas and see intuitively how new systems ought to behave."

Seeing intuitively how a double slit experiment behaves is understanding the particle always travels through a single slit and the associated wave in the aether passes through both.

Unfortunately intuition and common sense are not allowed in mainstream physics.

"The word 'ether' has extremely negative connotations in theoretical physics because of its past association with opposition to relativity. This is unfortunate because, stripped of these connotations, it rather nicely captures the way most physicists actually think about the vacuum. . . . Relativity actually says nothing about the existence or nonexistence of matter pervading the universe, only that any such matter must have relativistic symmetry. [..] It turns out that such matter exists. About the time relativity was becoming accepted, studies of radioactivity began showing that the empty vacuum of space had spectroscopic structure similar to that of ordinary quantum solids and fluids. Subsequent studies with large particle accelerators have now led us to understand that space is more like a piece of window glass than ideal Newtonian emptiness. It is filled with 'stuff' that is normally transparent but can be made visible by hitting it sufficiently hard to knock out a part. The modern concept of the vacuum of space, confirmed every day by experiment, is a relativistic ether. But we do not call it this because it is taboo." - Robert B. Laughlin, Nobel Laureate in Physics, endowed chair in physics, Stanford University

Matter, a piece of window glass and stuff have mass.

In a double slit experiment it is the stuff which waves.
 
Since not only is mainstream physics in denial of aether they appear to never be willing to understand it has mass and is displaced by the particles of matter which exist in it and move through it, so the timeframe is most likely generations.
Probably generations is right, but humans are persistent. We will get it right in time, I think.
...

Unfortunately intuition and common sense are not allowed in mainstream physics.
Of course they are, they are just not "ends" in themselves, they are the motivation to pursue ideas, perform experiments, make new discoveries. They may be the earliest phases of the scientific method, and in themselves are about as good as speculation and fantasy, but when properly followed with controlled and repeatable experiments and observations, they are valued tools.
 
Of course they are, they are just not "ends" in themselves, they are the motivation to pursue ideas, perform experiments, make new discoveries. They may be the earliest phases of the scientific method, and in themselves are about as good as speculation and fantasy, but when properly followed with controlled and repeatable experiments and observations, they are valued tools.

In a double slit experiment the particle is always detected entering, traveling through and exiting a single slit. The intuitive, common sense explanation for this is the particle always travels through a single slit.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interpretations_of_quantum_mechanics

5 Summary of common interpretations of quantum mechanics
5.1 Classification adopted by Einstein
5.2 The Copenhagen interpretation
5.3 Many worlds
5.4 Consistent histories
5.5 Ensemble interpretation, or statistical interpretation
5.6 de Broglie–Bohm theory
5.7 Relational quantum mechanics
5.8 Elementary cycles
5.9 Transactional interpretation
5.10 Stochastic mechanics
5.11 Objective collapse theories
5.12 von Neumann/Wigner interpretation: consciousness causes the collapse
5.13 Many minds
5.14 Quantum logic
5.15 Quantum information theories
5.16 Modal interpretations of quantum theory
5.17 Time-symmetric theories
5.18 Branching space–time theories
5.19 Other interpretations

When the 19th interpretation of what occurs in a double slit experiment is "more interpretations", instead of understanding the particle always travels through a single slit, then there is no intuition and common sense in mainstream physics.
 
In a double slit experiment the particle is always detected entering, traveling through and exiting a single slit. The intuitive, common sense explanation for this is the particle always travels through a single slit.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interpretations_of_quantum_mechanics

5 Summary of common interpretations of quantum mechanics
5.1 Classification adopted by Einstein
5.2 The Copenhagen interpretation
5.3 Many worlds
5.4 Consistent histories
5.5 Ensemble interpretation, or statistical interpretation
5.6 de Broglie–Bohm theory
5.7 Relational quantum mechanics
5.8 Elementary cycles
5.9 Transactional interpretation
5.10 Stochastic mechanics
5.11 Objective collapse theories
5.12 von Neumann/Wigner interpretation: consciousness causes the collapse
5.13 Many minds
5.14 Quantum logic
5.15 Quantum information theories
5.16 Modal interpretations of quantum theory
5.17 Time-symmetric theories
5.18 Branching space–time theories
5.19 Other interpretations

When the 19th interpretation of what occurs in a double slit experiment is "more interpretations", instead of understanding the particle always travels through a single slit, then there is no intuition and common sense in mainstream physics.
Lol, you make a good point. You can refer to QM as mainstream physics if you want, but the consensus within QM is the Copenhagen interpretation, in various forms, as I understand it. I would be the first to agree with you that, to me, the consensus in QM seems to want to keep us from ever believing in local reality. The Hidden Variables group of interpretations allow particles to be thought of as "real", in that they exist when no one is looking at them. My view is that the existence of a "medium of space", and the presence of particles composed of wave energy traversing that medium, is the foundation upon which a hidden variables interpretation can be built.
 
Back
Top