Is it the fault of gay marriage?
This article claims that the institution of marriage in certain portions of Europe, particularly Scandinavia, has been effectively killed, or at least severely weakened, by the legalization of gay marriage. Its numbers and such come from a study I can't seem to locate online.
I'd like to specifically ask any of you who live in the areas mentioned in the article, and/or those who might have seen this study: is there anything, anything in that study, or in your personal experience living in Scandinavia, to support any of the assertions in this article? Is this just yet another case of correlation/causation? Just because A is increasing as B decreases is not evidence of any relationship between the two. For instance; Levels of Internet fraud increased, as car crash fatalities decreased last year. There is no relationship between the two.
And, indeed, this is exactly what the article fails, or even attempts, to do; establish a relationship between the fall of one type of marriage on the rise of another. It is relying on the reader not questioning the fundamental premise of the entire article by simply producing some figures. And even if the article did establish a correlation, what relevance would it have on America?
Why do people insist on legally disenfranchising entire groups of people based on some intangible "ick" factor?
:m: Peace.
This article claims that the institution of marriage in certain portions of Europe, particularly Scandinavia, has been effectively killed, or at least severely weakened, by the legalization of gay marriage. Its numbers and such come from a study I can't seem to locate online.
I'd like to specifically ask any of you who live in the areas mentioned in the article, and/or those who might have seen this study: is there anything, anything in that study, or in your personal experience living in Scandinavia, to support any of the assertions in this article? Is this just yet another case of correlation/causation? Just because A is increasing as B decreases is not evidence of any relationship between the two. For instance; Levels of Internet fraud increased, as car crash fatalities decreased last year. There is no relationship between the two.
And, indeed, this is exactly what the article fails, or even attempts, to do; establish a relationship between the fall of one type of marriage on the rise of another. It is relying on the reader not questioning the fundamental premise of the entire article by simply producing some figures. And even if the article did establish a correlation, what relevance would it have on America?
Why do people insist on legally disenfranchising entire groups of people based on some intangible "ick" factor?
:m: Peace.