Is it moral to kill when a cure options is available?

Greatest I am

Valued Senior Member
Is it moral to kill when a cure options is available?

It is said that God can do whatever he likes. He is after all, God. He created everything and can destroy it at a whim if he chooses to do so. I do not believe this but will grant it as a truth for this O P.

Given that God can kill or cure, and given that we are to emulate, follow and try to be like him; it would seem that we too are to believe that sometimes it is better to kill than cure. I cannot think of any good situation to do this but that is just me. Perhaps you can.

Scriptures show God killing many or having men kill many. Scriptures show God curing on a few occasions but killing seems to be his preferred method.

Life, be it from God or nature, should be venerated. God does not seem to venerate human life even as he claims man to be his most precious and loved creation and even placing us above the angels. This indicates that he should venerate our lives yet it does not seem to.

In our human world, if a doctor who could cure his patient decided to kill him, he would be jailed and considered an evil person. In the believer world, a God who could cure and decides to kill is considered good and praised for his killing. A double standard. I hope that we will all agree that for a human to kill, when a cure option is available, is evil and immoral. If you do not; please do not reply.

Is it moral for God to kill when a cure options is available?

Does your God need to have good morals or does it matter?

Regards
DL
 
Life, be it from God or nature, should be venerated.

Why? Where does this rule originate?


God does not seem to venerate human life even as he claims man to be his most precious and loved creation and even placing us above the angels. This indicates that he should venerate our lives yet it does not seem to.

The biblical god never claims - as far as i recall - to venerate human life. Giveth and taketh away, because he can. He can do whatever he likes to the angels, as well.
 
Why? Where does this rule originate?

It originates in our survival instinct from what I can see and is universal.

http://blog.ted.com/2008/09/17/the_real_differ/

The biblical god never claims - as far as i recall - to venerate human life. Giveth and taketh away, because he can. He can do whatever he likes to the angels, as well.

As the only creature in God's image, we are unique. Even the angels are to bow to man. Further, dominion was given to us. There is nothing greater than man.

This is a morality thread as has been noted above.

Care to show yours on the question at hand?

Regards
DL
 
How many threads have you started covering the morality of a god?

http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=112124
http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=112003
http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=111853

You seem to have a lot of threads that repeat a very few topics over and over and over. Always seeming to abandon any that aren't going your way.

Because many do not want to face moral questions and morals are what religions are supposed to be all about. I try to make it hard for people to hide behind speculative nonsense like topics on God himself.

You will note that some say God can do whatever he wants while never producing anything that shows that God is more than a fantasy. They are letting a fantasy rule them and it shows in their poor morals

Get on topic or be ignored----again.

Regards
DL
 
Get on topic...

Which one...there's so many on the same topic.

You just seem to abandon a thread when you feel you are losing, only to start a new one under a slightly different guise. Should we just start copy/pasting our replies from those, just as you do with your canned reply to any argument of free will?
 
Back
Top