John J. Bannan
Registered Senior Member
If so, how?
The first four minutes of it. I'll watch the rest later.John did you go and see that video I pasted in the other thread ?
Yes.
GR is an effective field theory of string theory.
Think of it like those French impresionist paintings. When you're far away, the painting is nice and smooth. The closer you get, the more it looks like just a mess of brush strokes.
The first four minutes of it. I'll watch the rest later.
>>"French impresionist paintings."
Hum,
But no Pointalism.
Ok, because that video answer the question you ask here perfectly.
I will post it here also, so you don't have to look for the other one.
http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/brian_greene_on_string_theory.html
If so, how?
Empty space is made of emptiness.
Yes.
GR is an effective field theory of string theory.
Think of it like those French impresionist paintings. When you're far away, the painting is nice and smooth. The closer you get, the more it looks like just a mess of brush strokes.
Different vibrations.
Ok, because that video answer the question you ask here perfectly.
I will post it here also, so you don't have to look for the other one.
http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/brian_greene_on_string_theory.html
I watched the video. So, are you saying that empty space and matter are both made of the same thing, but that they are 1-dimensional strings that vibrate differently?
Like I said before, I'm not exactly an authority on string theory.
What I know is what I see and hear from it.
Brain Green IS an authority in the particular area though (the dude in the video).
Yes,
The implication is that a particle in one location can pop out of existence, and turn into space or time, or another completely different particle.