Is Einstein's G*d malicious?

[Garry Denke]

Investigating the Quantum variation of Frequency laws:

Energy = hbar [(G*d)^1/2] is correct, but the current definition of hbar is not. Decades ago it was postulated that hbar = e^2 / alpha*c in cgs units and it was postulated that hbar = e^2 / (4pi)*e0*alpha*c in SI units. However both postulates in both systems of the theoretical definition(s) were proven false by Lewis & Adams (1914) and Sommerfeld (1916). The actual measured quantum of alpha is hbar = h (2*alpha) in both the cgs and SI systems. This is quite a quantum variation, and a hand tinkering with the fundamentals, indeed. Since hbar = Energy / [(G*d)^1/2] and since hbar = h (2*alpha) it is a simple matter to write Energy = h (2*alpha) [(G*d)^1/2]. Remember, hbar = h / (2pi) was only a theory, hbar = h (2*alpha) is a measured quantity.

force = c^4 / G
Quantum variation? None
G = gravitation
c = light
f = force

power = c^5 / G
Quantum variation? None
G = gravitation
c = light
p = power

frequency = (G*d)^1/2
Quantum variation? Root
G = gravitation
d = density
1/t = frequency

energy = hbar [(G*d)^1/2]
Quantum variation? Yes
G = gravitation
d = density
hbar = quantum of alpha
E = energy

energy = h (2*alpha) [(G*d)^1/2]
Quantum variation? Yes
G = gravitation
d = density
h = quantum of action
alpha = interaction strength
E = energy

Wherever there is frequency, its Root (G*d)^1/2 is there.
Subtle is the Lord, but malicious He is not.
A good definition for density?

Thanks!

 

[spidergoat]

If Einstein's G*d is the little white pills that the nice doctors prescribed for you then no, it's not malicious. I recommend you take a few.

 

[Smellsniffsniff]

If Einstein's G*d is the little white pills that the nice doctors prescribed for you then no, it's not malicious. I recommend you take a few.

This time you might be right.

 

[Garry Denke]

spidergoat,

How you been? What is new?

G*d

 

[oozish]

-(2)(lambda)/3=mass of graviton

 

[spidergoat]

spidergoat,

How you been? What is new?

G*d

Pretty good. Not much.

 

[Garry Denke]

Pretty good. Not much.

That's great. Same here.

 

[Garry Denke]

Hey OMEGA

-(2)(lambda)/3=mass of graviton

Hey OMEGA

I like it short, and to the point.

Energy = e^2*z0*[(G*d)^1/2] ...... (impedance)
Energy = e^2*[(G*d)^1/2]/e0*c ... (electric)
Energy = e^2*u0*c*[(G*d)^1/2] ... (magnetic)

Why is G*d everywhere?

E = dark energy
e = elementary charge
z0 = impedance of vacuum
G = gravitational constant
d = dark matter density
e0 = electric constant
c = speed of light in vacuum
u0 = magnetic constant

 

[bsemak]

Where exactly did you get these equations? Looks like unit-playing to me. Since when has the gravitational constant anything to do with electromagnetic energy? I fail to see any physical reality in these equations

 

[Garry Denke]

Where exactly did you get these equations? Looks like unit-playing to me. Since when has the gravitational constant anything to do with electromagnetic energy? I fail to see any physical reality in these equations

Translated from German

1886 history
University of Kiel
Whilhelm Frederick Denke, Sr
(1864-1936) vs.
Max Karl Ernst Ludwig Planck
(1858-1947) at
Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel

1886-2006 history
The cgs System of Units

Measurements 2006 (cgs)
hbar=9.6705522(32) x 10^-29 g-cm^2/s
(4pi)=1.256637061... x 10^1
e=4.8032042(73) x 10^-10 esu
e^2=2.3070771(29) x 10^-19 esu^2
c=2.99792458 x 10^10 cm/s
alpha=7.2973525(37) x 10^-3 sr

Denke (cgs)
e=[hbar*c/(4pi)]^1/2
hbar=(4pi)*e^2/c
c=(4pi)*e^2/hbar
(4pi)=hbar*c/e^2

Planck (cgs)
e=[hbar*alpha*c]^1/2
hbar=e^2/alpha*c
c=e^2/alpha*hbar
alpha=e^2/hbar*c

Conversions 2006 (SI)
hbar=9.6705522(32) x 10^-36 kg-m^2/s
(4pi)=1.256637061... x 10^1
e=1.6021764(87) x 10^-19 A-s
e^2=2.5669694(96) x 10^-38 A^2-s^2
c=2.99792458 x 10^8 m/s
alpha=7.2973525(37) x 10^-3 sr

Denke (SI)
e=(hbar/omega)^1/2
hbar=e^2*omega
omega=hbar/e^2
e=(hbar*electric*c)^1/2
hbar=e^2*/electric*c
electric=e^2/hbar*c
e=(hbar/magnetic*c)^1/2
hbar=e^2*magnetic*c
magnetic=hbar/e^2*c

Planck (SI)
e=[(4pi)*e0*hbar*alpha*c]^1/2
(4pi)=e^2/e0*hbar*alpha*c
e0=e^2/(4pi)*hbar*alpha*c
hbar=e^2/(4pi)*e0*alpha*c
alpha=e^2/(4pi)*e0*hbar*c
c=e^2/(4pi)*e0*hbar*alpha

GUT (SI)
hbar=e^2*omega
hbar=e^2/electric*c
hbar=e^2*magnetic*c

alpha=hbar/(2*h)
hbar=h*(2*alpha)
h=hbar/(2*alpha)
omega=hbar/e^2
hbar=e^2*omega
e^2=hbar/omega

Thanks!

 

[Garry Denke]

Has anyone seen the movie "23"?

I saw "4" and "4" and 24" after seeing The Number 23 movie.
It was last February 23 but I did not see the old movie "23".

Peter Higgs

Old story, New names

4 riders 4 forces
.000...1 strong (on gluons)
.000...1 electromagnetic (on photons)
.000...1 weak (on W-Z bosons)
.999... gravitation (on gravitons)

4 horses 4 bosons
.999... gluon (spin 1/1)
.999... photon (spin 1/1)
.999... W-Z bosons (spin 1/1)
.000...1 graviton (spin 2/1)

24 elders 24 fermions
.333... quarks (spin 1/2)
down quark >< down antiquark
strange quark >< strange antiquark
bottom quark >< bottom antiquark
.666... quarks (spin 1/2)
up quark >< up antiquark
charm quark >< charm antiquark
top quark >< top antiquark
.999... leptons (spin 1/2)
electron >< positron
muon >< positive muon
tau >< positive tau
.000...1 leptons (spin 1/2)
electron-neutrino >< electron-antineutrino
muon-neutrino >< muon-antineutrino
tau-neutrino >< tau-antineutrino

Has anybody seen the Planes, Trains and Automobiles movie?
It reminds me of Einstein yelling, "Your going the wrong way!"

Albert Einstein