In Lieu of Darwinism

What is, "darwinism" could you please clarify that. I would like a complete accepted description of what you mean by the term. Or is it just one of those made up christian words again?
 
I found your description of darwinism:

In the 19th-century context in which Darwin's Origin of Species was first received, "Darwinism" came to stand for an entire range of evolutionary (and often revolutionary) philosophies about both biology and society.
Click to expand...

Do you know what century this is?
 
How interesting that in 150 years evolution has become the central dogma of biology and not a single of you Woo Woos have been able to lodge it from there with your delusions.
 
Rather than "panspermia" supposedly being a possiblility of how simple life forms got to Earth, and as there is no real indication that tree shrews morphed into humans, or chimpmunks into horses, why not just note that animals cannot cross syngameon boundries to reproduce, and then concentrate on establishing the limits of the syngameons vis-a-vis extant and extinct creatures, saying that the origin of the syngameons is subject to debate?

Then just leave the Darwinism for the philosophy and religion departments.
 
Darwinian faith is science, as proponed by mainstream academics, when actually it is just another philosophy or religion, afterall, it does take faith to believe that frogs morphed into birds, and mold morphed into spiders.
 
IceAgeCivilizations said:
Rather than "panspermia" supposedly being a possiblility of how simple life forms got to Earth, and as there is no real indication that tree shrews morphed into humans, or chimpmunks into horses, why not just note that animals cannot cross syngameon boundries to reproduce, and then concentrate on establishing the limits of the syngameons vis-a-vis extant and extinct creatures, saying that the origin of the syngameons is subject to debate?

Then just leave the Darwinism for the philosophy and religion departments.
Click to expand...

Because we tried that already and found conflict with whats here on earth. Now we're figuring out that any one organism is able to produce a line of offspring that can become any other organism, given enough time and environmental motivation.
 
IceAgeCivilizations said:
Darwinian faith is science, as proponed by mainstream academics, when actually it is just another philosophy or religion, afterall, it does take faith to believe that frogs morphed into birds, and mold morphed into spiders.
Click to expand...

Why do you insist on making up an entirely new science (or at least an entirely new viewpoint in science) to argue against, instead of arguing against the real thing? Or is it that you have nothing to argue against within the accepted theories of evolution?
 
RoyLennigan said:
Why do you insist on making up an entirely new science (or at least an entirely new viewpoint in science) to argue against, instead of arguing against the real thing? Or is it that you have nothing to argue against within the accepted theories of evolution?
Click to expand...

Strawmen are far easier for the simple-minded to handle.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top