Immortal argument

Mythbuster

Mushroomed
Registered Senior Member
P1. God is immortal (Not subject to death)
P2. Life is a mortal quality that distinguishes living organisms from dead organisms.
P3. God cant be life.
 
God is eternal, or "alpha and omega", the only thing that is unchanging, the causeless cause, ofcourse God isn't life nor death
 
vo is right eternal is the word not immortal he has no begining and no end he has no physical life but when one of his persons took on a human nature but he is eteral life life after death, the life we would have had if we had stayed in the garden
 
Are these premises to an elaborate argument or just statements of their own right meant to be argued?
 
The fallacy is the assumption that being alive implies mortality. It does not logically follow that something alive must die.

P2 is invalid.
 
Back
Top