I think I have problem

Well I just said I don't cover songs but I learn from them anyway. The techniques used I simply understand without playing them.
I asked some people I know and they said that they don't think I'm an autist. Well they can't really tell what I am but i guess there is no real name for that that's what makes me an individual dosn't it?
 
Well I just said I don't cover songs but I learn from them anyway. The techniques used I simply understand without playing them.
I asked some people I know and they said that they don't think I'm an autist. Well they can't really tell what I am but i guess there is no real name for that that's what makes me an individual dosn't it?

What techniques do you understand . I didn't catch what instrument you play?
The subtlety of performance are so vast. Playing them is a way better way to realize them . A lot of people listen and sing along and get the feeling they are in perfect pitch with the song . Were the rubber meets the road is with out accompaniment . You stand out solo and see if you carry the tune for starters . Then there is the old adage " If you can't play it slow how you gonna play it fast . Can you count while to play ? That be a good tool to have . You say you like to experiment with rhythm right . Do you have a defined beat that is countable ? If so how hard is it to fined the timing ?

Are you looping tracks . Is that what you do ?
 
I do a lot of stuff with sequenzer software. I play tracks on a midi keyboard and mix them together in the software. Aside of that I play piano. Training the piano requires playing not self composed songs and I guess I'm fine with that as long as I keep producing my own music.

Btw. yesterday I had a "discussion" with my father. He wants me to do something usefull in the house like cleaning and he thinks that it is morally despicable and wants me to belive the same. I told him that I can't do that because the majority opinion of humans can change really fast. I gave him an example of the Third Reich but he said that I was avoiding the problem. Well I maybe was but I had an aim as you will see in the following.
He told him that he can not use a tool without know how it works. I obviously wanted him to try to understand me but he rejected and was the opinion I am in no way cooperating with him. I told him that it won't be possible for him to use me(I want to say it that way because well..we use people to achieve something..dispite that it may sound weird) if you does not know me. He said that he does not know whether he should talk to me like a grown-up or a child and I told him that that's not his decision to make. He said that he can't talk with me if I don't speak to him and I said that I always told him everything I know but thats simply not very much. Well it did go on some time like this and his voice was getting louder and louder. I was asking him why we couldn't have a discussion without screaming and he said that I am talking to him like I was looking down on him and I asked whether it was a problem for him and it was. I said that it is not my and if he wanted to change the feeling he had while looking at me he should rather change his own interpretation than changing me because he obviously can not change me without knowing how. Well I guess I was a little bit mean but his problems simply don't bother me. I have my own.
 
I do a lot of stuff with sequenzer software. I play tracks on a midi keyboard and mix them together in the software. Aside of that I play piano. Training the piano requires playing not self composed songs and I guess I'm fine with that as long as I keep producing my own music.

Btw. yesterday I had a "discussion" with my father. He wants me to do something usefull in the house like cleaning and he thinks that it is morally despicable and wants me to belive the same. I told him that I can't do that because the majority opinion of humans can change really fast. I gave him an example of the Third Reich but he said that I was avoiding the problem. Well I maybe was but I had an aim as you will see in the following.
He told him that he can not use a tool without know how it works. I obviously wanted him to try to understand me but he rejected and was the opinion I am in no way cooperating with him. I told him that it won't be possible for him to use me(I want to say it that way because well..we use people to achieve something..dispite that it may sound weird) if you does not know me. He said that he does not know whether he should talk to me like a grown-up or a child and I told him that that's not his decision to make. He said that he can't talk with me if I don't speak to him and I said that I always told him everything I know but thats simply not very much. Well it did go on some time like this and his voice was getting louder and louder. I was asking him why we couldn't have a discussion without screaming and he said that I am talking to him like I was looking down on him and I asked whether it was a problem for him and it was. I said that it is not my and if he wanted to change the feeling he had while looking at me he should rather change his own interpretation than changing me because he obviously can not change me without knowing how. Well I guess I was a little bit mean but his problems simply don't bother me. I have my own.

Well, your Dad asked you to help around the house, and you think that intelligent people shouldn't do that? OK, funny how all of a sudden you are on a site trying to be super intelligent when there is work to be done. I think that we have solved the case. You want to apply intelligence to getting out of cleaning.. it doesn't work like that.
 
I don't think intelligent people shouldn't clean. The text is not about cleaning. I do clean he just does not notice because I just do when it has to be done and is not already done. The text is about my father avoiding learing who I am. He wouldn't ask me to clean if he'd know me. He just would have to stop cleaning to achieve that. The text is about people around me missunderstanding me and showing you my situation.
 
I don't think intelligent people shouldn't clean. The text is not about cleaning. I do clean he just does not notice because I just do when it has to be done and is not already done. The text is about my father avoiding learing who I am. He wouldn't ask me to clean if he'd know me. He just would have to stop cleaning to achieve that. The text is about people around me missunderstanding me and showing you my situation.

Maybe just forget about inner emotions for awhile, and think more about producing a portfolio of work. Your emotions at 15 are all over the place. Nobody really knows who a 15 year old is yet.
 
It's also not about inner emotions. It is to show you my situation. Anyway thanks for your belive in my personality. I am in a situation in which there are no people who understand me or at least are similar to me. I really don't care for anyones cleaning problems. Well like I said. You can not use a tool without knowing how it works. I don't know me myself and I think I want to figure that out. Well I have emotions that's sure but they are not all over the place. They are very little and mostly come when I'm alone.

I must say that I like to be alone. In a world where men can not understand me and I can not explain myself loneliness is a welcome but rare gift but from anywhere I know that it could be better and that's why I originaly thought of a problem I might have.

Well a lot of people now thought that I am "trying to be super intelligent". Well it is kinda hurting me to hear all the time that I am trying to be someone I'm not. Well I'll continue to be like I think I am till you convinced me that I am wrong in my thoughts.
 
I don't think intelligent people shouldn't clean. The text is not about cleaning. I do clean he just does not notice because I just do when it has to be done and is not already done. The text is about my father avoiding learing who I am. He wouldn't ask me to clean if he'd know me. He just would have to stop cleaning to achieve that. The text is about people around me missunderstanding me and showing you my situation.

I'm gonna be straight with you, here's not a diss or a compliment, but you are an artist type.

Okay, here's what I'm seeing, he asked you to help clean the house, and you were being a dick about it. I understand you obviously don't wanna do it, but there's a point and when you reach it, you shut up and just do it and talk about it later.

From what you are saying, its not that hes avoiding learning who you are, its you thinking your dad's a dumbass. Its you not communicating.

I dunno about you, but for me, sometimes I get emotional and there are moments that I think my dad doesn't know anything, but I know that my dad is the smartest person I have ever met, and believe me, I know A LOT of people.

Its his house so he ultimately makes the decision when it should be cleaned. Try saying what you said when you get a job and have a boss. Your boss might honestly be dumb and irritating, but hes your boss.
 
We are not talking about once btw. it would be a general decison. And I really want to dicsuss before I agree if it is about anything lasting more than one year. I personally think my points in the discussion were valid and realistic. The part when I was mean was simply ignoring the general opinion of men today.
You can not compare a relationship with my father and me with the one of me and my boss. My father has an emotional relationship with me also.

Well I think my father has some knowledge. More than me. But I can not see him as very intelligent because I have to say some things many many times before he understands at all. Well my thinking sometimes can ba very abstract but not unimaginable. And the most things we talk about is not of very great complications.

Well it is his house and I am allowed to live in it. On the other hand I don't have a choice to go somewhere else. This would probably not be a counterpoint to cleaning if there wouldn't be an emotional relationship involved. But there is.
Well you can't conclude my fathers intelligence by judging about yours but I see a certain logic behind the idea of a person who knows you best and seems the be fairly intelligent due to that.
 
You guys are typing too fast.
Are you typing in English on a German keyboard? That will really slow you down. Y and Z are reversed because Z is one of the most common letters in German while Y is rare; whereas it's just the opposite in English. Because of the awkward slant left over from the days of manual typewriters, Z and Q are the most difficult letters to reach on an English keyboard; or Y and Q on a German one.
Haha then according to you I must be a bit crazy, but believe me there is a lot to prove at age 15, besides superiority, we can also prove our character.
Adolescence is a time when we strive to prove our individuality. As children we are programmed to learn how to be like everyone else, and as we enter adulthood we begin to accept the responsibility to be compatible with the tribe/nation/species--depending on the level of advancement of our own people--in order to promote further advancement. Its during the years in between that we try to find our own unique qualities that distinguish us from everyone else.
We don't only prove to other 15 year olds, we prove to respectable and important adults.
Perhaps most importantly, we want to prove it to ourselves. As children we feel a sense of pride for fitting in, as teenagers we feel a sense of pride for becoming unique, and as adults we integrate those two aspects of our pride by using the combination of our unique characteristics and our commonalities, to find our place in the world.
Like I said, there is a reason why we think old and middle-aged men don't make sense, it's because they forgot their childhood and teen years.
Many of us are still preoccupied with things that went wrong in our youth. This is probably most common among the Baby Boomers (the first generation born after World War II), who felt an extreme lack of connection to their elders and tried very hard to create a different sort of world than the one they were born into, only to discover that their ability to do that was quite limited. This led to a lifelong feeling of frustration for many of them. But it's also not uncommon among those of us who are slightly older (the War Babies). There were not enough of us to be a "generation" and have a massive impact on our culture, so some of us aligned with the older kids (the Depression Babies), while others found it easier to integrate with the Boomers. (For me the choice was easy because I loved rock'n'roll and still do. ;)) So we're stuck in the same conundrum as the Boomers: How did we get this old without accomplishing all those things that we swore we would devote our lives to? Why is there still war, racism, poverty, sexism and religion?

Believe me, not being able to forget our childhood and teen years does not endear us to you younger people any more than forgetting them does!
There are some other things I would classify as not normal. In fact last year I stopped going to school for a week and I really can't tell you why. I just lay on the floor and thought about anything. I really can't tell you about what anymore but I also never saw this behavior on other kids. I just ignored my father with whom I'm living since 2 years. I also don't know the reason of that. Well there are some other things but I guess I've made my point.
Please understand that these things are in fact quite normal at your age. Adults don't want you to know that so they try to not let you know that other kids are doing it, but they are. You apparently don't socialize well with other people your own age, so you are not completely aware of what they do or how they feel.

As long as you don't let this type of behavior consume you so that you fail to become educated or become completely estranged from your family, these incidents are just part of the process of growing up. The fact that you are analyzing them and trying to understand them puts you far ahead of other people your age, so you can be proud of that. Unfortunately it also makes you feel bad. So let me point out that one of the things you are also learning is that life can be unfair and difficult. By learning that now, and not just learning it but trying to find a way to fix it, you are preparing yourself to be a wise adult. Again, you have a right to be proud of yourself.
I understand that Europeans in general are somewhat less prudish than Canadians.
Carolyn Hax, my favorite advice columnist, said it this way in her advice to an American who just came back from a European vacation with his head spinning: In Sweden it is not rude to be naked. It is just rude to notice.
No artist likes to cover. It is the thing we most hate in the world.
This is not true at all. If so, then all the great performers of symphonic and chamber music would hate what they do. There is great opportunity in interpretation, and that is creativity. Have you never heard two performances of the same piece and marveled at the fact that although both were stunning, they were quite different and evoked different emotions in you? A friend of mine is an award-winning composer and concert pianist. He wrote a piece called Lullaby of War, which weaves around narrations of famous poems about the wars of the last couple of centuries. I've heard him perform it, and then I heard another of our friends (not a composer but a celebrated pianist) play it. I remarked to the composer that when he plays it, it makes me sad, but when the other fellow plays it, it makes me angry. They sound like two different pieces.

We don't think of pop music as having this same breadth of opportunity for interpretation by the performer, largely because with exceptions like the Progressive Rock era most of the compositions are much shorter. But those opportunities are there. Listen to Lucie Silvas's rendition of Metallica's "Nothing Else Matters" or Charlotte Martin singing the Rolling Stones' "Wild Horses," both with piano accompaniment rather than a guitar-centric band, or Alana Davis's acoustic version of Blue Oyster Cult's "Don't Fear the Reaper." (Yeah, I'm a girl singer junkie.)

When I joined my current band I loved their songs (all original, many on CDs that are 15 or 20 years old) but I felt that something was lacking. So I rearranged the bass lines for almost all of them. They're falling all over themselves in gratitude, telling me that I've breathed new life into their music and raised it to a new plateau.

One does not have to go to these lengths to bring out something new in a pop song. It can be just like a sonata or a concerto: Play the same notes, but make slight changes in the dynamics, and people will hear it in a new way.
One thing about playing your own music is the rut . It is very easy to fall in the rut and never get out . You will have some of that as a signature anyway just by being you , but exploration in what you don't know can help keep you out of the rut.
This is why the bands we consider "great" don't play their songs the same way every time.
yesterday I had a "discussion" with my father. He wants me to do something usefull in the house like cleaning and he thinks that it is morally despicable and wants me to belive the same.
He is simply trying to teach you something that is crucial to being an honorable member of the human race: Everyone has to do their part to keep things running, or civilization will collapse. Your family home is a microcosm of the world: cleaning must be done, things must be kept in order, or else it will become a jungle and you won't be able to walk without tripping over something, you won't be able to find anything, and your food will make you sick.

Back in the Paleolithic Era 12,000 years ago, people didn't have houses or grocery stores. They just walked through the woods hunting animals and gathering plants to eat. They didn't have much work to do; it's estimated that it only took them three hours per day to find, cook and eat their food. But their lives were vapid. They slept on the ground and had no furniture or pottery, and only the most small, primitive musical instruments and artworks.

We invented agriculture, civilization, metalworking, industry and computers because we wanted more out of life than mere survival. As a result, we have to work more hours, but we have much richer lives.

Your father is simply doing his job, trying to raise a son who will be a productive member of civilization, rather than a caveman. If you don't get in the habit now of doing menial, uninteresting work in addition to the enjoyable work of composing music and discussing the philosophy of life on SciForums, life will be very difficult for you as an adult. You need to learn that even though, on the balance, life is very nice for most human beings here in the Developed World, there are some things that are not very nice but nonetheless absolutely must be done. Maybe some day you will be rich and can pay somebody else to do your housework, but I assure you that even then there will be things you have to do that you don't like, just different things than the rest of us have to do. You will spend a lot of time in very boring meetings, trying to be nice to people you don't like!
I gave him an example of the Third Reich but he said that I was avoiding the problem.
That's funny! In America (and perhaps other anglophone countries) we use the term "Godwin's Law" to refer to an internet discussion in which someone compares something he doesn't like to Hitler and the Nazis. The rule says that once that remark is posted, the discussion will quickly die. Your father apparently followed the same rule. :)
He said that he does not know whether he should talk to me like a grown-up or a child and I told him that that's not his decision to make.
Of course it is. He is the adult and you are the child! The role of a parent is to raise his child so the child learns how to be an adult. Until you learn that, he cannot treat you as an adult.

Adults don't drop out of their job for a week the way you dropped out of school. Adults don't leave their home dirty and expect someone else to do the work the way you do. Adults don't avoid the company of the people around them the way you avoid the other kids at school.

You are clearly not an adult! So your father absolutely cannot treat you like one.
 
Last edited:
"Until you learn that" You proved my point

"Adults don't avoid the company of the people around them the way you avoid the other kids at school." I do talk to people if they ask me something and I am not avoiding them in this situation. I just do not intend to go to them and start talking with no reason.

"Adults don't leave their home dirty and expect someone else to do the work the way you do" I do clean. I allready mentioned that. I just don't if he does. I don't like something to be dirty also.

Yeah he is trying to push me in the system and I do fit in quite nicely. I am working everyday, I am trying to get nice grades and I don't criticize the system in public and I have aims for later achievements.
 
"Until you learn that" You proved my point

"Adults don't avoid the company of the people around them the way you avoid the other kids at school." I do talk to people if they ask me something and I am not avoiding them in this situation. I just do not intend to go to them and start talking with no reason.

"Adults don't leave their home dirty and expect someone else to do the work the way you do" I do clean. I allready mentioned that. I just don't if he does. I don't like something to be dirty also.

Yeah he is trying to push me in the system and I do fit in quite nicely. I am working everyday, I am trying to get nice grades and I don't criticize the system in public and I have aims for later achievements.

What achievements do you have mapped out for yourself, whevr?

I have to get some sleep now for graveyard shift, but I'll check back on this thread later.
 
Well, I guess first of all I want to reconstruct my brain and use modern hardware to make me think faster. After that I can keep going to think about what I really want to achieve. I ever wanted to see the 4th dimension. Assuming its existence is real.
Probably I'll just come to the conclusion that I don't want to exist at all and discover the nothing. But probably after the dimension stuff because I'm kinda curious about new directions and ways.
 
I agree with James R. There is nothing wrong with you. Different parts of your brain mature at different times. It’s difficult for you to see the big picture because your prefrontal cortex isn’t fully mature.

Whoa...wait a minute. I wouldn't say it's accurate to dismiss these problems as standard issue "angst". Sometimes, it really is misunderstanding, not because you're young, but because youth culture or, yes, differences in intelligence get in the way. A lot of kids think it's cool to be dumb; if he's not one of them he is going to have a hard time.

I was one of those 'misunderstood' kids. Why? Because my prefrontal cortex was not yet grown? No - because I was around people who didn't even know what simple words meant.
 
Last edited:
I was one of those 'misunderstood' kids. Why? Because my prefrontal cortex was not yet grown? No - because I was around people who didn't even know what simple words meant.
I hope this doesn't sound stupid, but: Really?

Firstly, when you say "kid" are you talking 10-12 years old? Or 13-15 years old? Or older? I was thinking 10-12 years old as that's when I think of myself really as being a "kid". I started working when I was 12 and so I kind of didn't think of myself so much as being a kid thereafter. I was, but I didn't think I was :eek:

Which is why I asked: Really?

Why would people notice a kid and then take the time to listen to them and then surmise something about that kids' thoughts and then not get it??? If I were you, I'd taking being misunderstood as a compliment. Most adults really couldn't care what a child is thinking about, let alone, actually take the time NOT to get them.

I grew up around a LOT of pot-heads. Sometimes they liked to sit around and spew some "wisdom" to me. I don't really recall anyone asking me what I was thinking. They surely didn't misunderstand me as I was usually quite blunt with them: You're all a bunch of broke-ass losers mooching free dope off the old man. Pot heads notice kids and when they're high they may try to have an intelligent conversation with them. Usually they're amazed that kids actually have something intelligible to say. Like WOW, kids say the damnest things. Usually kids say what's obvious. Most people build entire lives around illusions kids simply haven't had the time, or inclination, to build.

If you grew up around pot-heads, or drug users, then I suppose I can relate. But, if you grew up around "normal" (whatever that is) people and they really took the time to misunderstand you, well, you could take that as a compliment :shrug: Something about you was interesting enough to be noticed and listened to with some amount of seriousness.
 
...Well let me give you an example: I don't understand any kind of adjective because I have no absolute match for it. What's good if we don't know whats bad and vice versa. I know thats kinda preposterous but it shows a little but of what I ment...

Adjectives are descriptions. The dog (subject) has black fur (adjective). The word black maps to a very specific color and the word fur maps to a very specific growth commonly seen on mammals. You used the words "good" and "bad" as examples of where you have problems with adjectives. Those words are subjective (i.e. they don't map to anything real outside the context of a person's mind). Most people handle subjective words by not defining them and instead associating examples with them. Brushing your teeth is "good", helping your friend is "good", hitting your sister is "bad", eating fast food is "bad". What you will notice is that many people use the same subjective words (as adjectives or otherwise) and are really talking about different conceptual examples.

For whatever reason, you appear to have difficulty working with subjective words as adjectives. Most people don't; however, when those words are used they can mean very different things from person to person. I would probably (once you have the resources to do so) talk to a psychologist about this and see if you have any kind of cognitive issues (ex. learning disabilities, syndromes, etc.). If you do, then there may be alot of good methods for dealing with them.
 
@Crunchy Cat We map the word "good" to whatever we think it is and that's what's making communication kinda complex. The difference between an adjective like "blue" is that with blue we can find an exact negativ match: "not blue". When communication first started to develop the definition of blue only worked because most people had kinda similar understanding of outside influences. But did they really? We learned to call something blue whether it's looking not blue for us because we could not decide which is which before we learned. Well, for colors we can say now that it has some differences like freq. or ability to change objects like electrons but there are plenty of "subjective" words for what we can't. Or well I just don't know how to. Well we can actually say something more about understanding of subjective things but what I really want to say is that even our cognition is doubtable. That's the reason why I have my little problems with it. Well I think we acctually can convince me of thinking different about it and I would really appreciate it becaue that woudl solve my problem with understanding adjectives.

Well actually I wouldn't really because I have no real problem with using them. Just understanding them. I know where to put good in most cases (depends on the person to whom I'm speaking to) and I know in most cases where to put blue but that's not really solving the understanding issue.

4 years ago is was told that'd have dyslexia. I actually have my doubts with that because I can read fluent and my orthography is not very bad at all. Well you can pick up on some things I disspelled but I guess it wont reach any critical level.

learning disabilities. Well. I am fairly totally absolute middle skilled in everything. Everything I do. There is nothing I do bad and there is nothing I do good. Well that's kinda bad for me also because I can't back out myself in any thing I can do best. This might led to some depressions I had.

syndromes. Earlier in this thread asperger's syndrom was called. Well this is the one I would describe myself most but still not very much. If I have such a thing I really know how to hide it.

etc. Well. Like asperger's syndrom suggests I have a tend to talk very professional. Might not seem to you that way but don't forget I am writing in a language I am not perfectly common with. This could be an indication for either called syndrom or high intelligence. Or some other things I did not think of such as trying to hide who I really am etc.
I really don't want to sound arrogant but to say what I think I might have to. I simply did not meet many people reaching my level of intelligence. Lets just say the following: I did not meet many people thinking the same way I do.
Thats less arrogant and demeaning so I'll stick with that one. Whether this thinking the way I do is a sign of intelligence or not I really can't tell but from my point of view it seems like. Well thats kinda obvious but anyway.

What would psycologists do besides craping in my brain? Well they won't analyse my brain cause they simply don't have necessary equipment in my region and I am changing the way I act clockwise around a an object in 1 dimensional space. Just want to say I do it really often and depending on like fluctuating mass near the big bang assumed that the universe has enough mass to collaps after a time and creates a new big bang because the nothing is not capable of holding a mass of infinity. Well I thought of making a simpler description but I came up with a similar so I guess this is the best way for me to describe it. Back to the point. I talked to some psychologists and I really expect them drawing some white rabbits on there paper. I don't want to talk bad about psycologist but I do. Well at least about those I talked with.
 
Originally posted by whevr

Lets just say the following: I did not meet many people thinking the same way I do.
Thats less arrogant and demeaning so I'll stick with that one.

I appreciate the way you have phrased the above sentence, whevr, and I am finding you fairly easy to comprehend. You are writing better in your second language than many who were raised with English.

In the same way that we are all unique in our DNA, I am of the opinion that we all think just a bit differently in the way that our brain makes associations. That we all occupy slightly different space also means that none of us experience anything exactly the same as another, because light and sound input is somewhat different at each location, and each of us has unique properties in how we perceive light, sound and other sensory input.

We are separated by these many small differences, yet we share the common experience of living on the earth at this time and will have many similar experiences as we go through life, depending on our culture, gender and climate.

Thank you for your time and effort in sharing what your experiences, perceptions and realizations are. Through the sharing of others, we gain new perspectives of our own journey.

I have often wondered if any two people can truly appreciate how another is experiencing life. Most of us on this journey are just doing the best we know how at the time.

Our 'understanding' is a constantly changing state of mind, in all dimensions. :)
 
@Crunchy Cat We map the word "good" to whatever we think it is and that's what's making communication kinda complex. The difference between an adjective like "blue" is that with blue we can find an exact negativ match: "not blue". When communication first started to develop the definition of blue only worked because most people had kinda similar understanding of outside influences. But did they really? We learned to call something blue whether it's looking not blue for us because we could not decide which is which before we learned. Well, for colors we can say now that it has some differences like freq. or ability to change objects like electrons but there are plenty of "subjective" words for what we can't. Or well I just don't know how to. Well we can actually say something more about understanding of subjective things but what I really want to say is that even our cognition is doubtable. That's the reason why I have my little problems with it. Well I think we acctually can convince me of thinking different about it and I would really appreciate it becaue that woudl solve my problem with understanding adjectives.

Well actually I wouldn't really because I have no real problem with using them. Just understanding them. I know where to put good in most cases (depends on the person to whom I'm speaking to) and I know in most cases where to put blue but that's not really solving the understanding issue.

Some subjective words such as "fast" and "hot" have antonyms such as "slow" and "cold". The reason this is possible is because they are individual tolerances to objective phenomena (speed and temperature in this example). Other subjectiv words such as "good" don't have a clear antonym because there are so many contexts for the word and they have meanings derived from collections of examples rather than definitions. The good news is that every subjective word that I have come across can be assigned an objective definition (which immediately brings about antonym potential). Unfortunately it is difficult to do this because it requires a lot of knowledge and life experience.

As an exercise, let's take a look at a particular contextual use of the word "good" via the statement "David is a good person". The first thing to think about is who is issuing that statement. Let's say it is someone named Jane and we discover that she values honesty and defending people who arent strong / knowledgeable enough to defend themselves. Jane observes that David is honest and defends those who cannot defend themselves; therefore, she asserts that David is a good person. To objectify her statement we would transform it to "David is honest and a defender of the defenseless". From here, antonyms for the adjectives "honest", "defender", and "defenseless" are easy to determine; however, we still don't have a solid handle on the word "good" (even though we have Jane's intended meaning and antonyms for her adjectives).

If we were to continue this process by analyzing the same context of the word "good" for other people we can come up with an objective definition. "Good" is when a person's behaviors and actions match what another person values. With this definition we now can derive a clear antonym (ex. "Bad" is when a person's behaviors and actions don't match what another person values).

Of course there are other contexts of how people use the word "Good" so to model a complete objective defintion, all the seperate contexts would have to be explored, objectified, and then modeled into a single objective definition. It's no trivial task but it can certainly be done.

4 years ago is was told that'd have dyslexia. I actually have my doubts with that because I can read fluent and my orthography is not very bad at all. Well you can pick up on some things I disspelled but I guess it wont reach any critical level.

If your dyslexia doesn't cause any problems then I wouldn't worry about it; however, I am wondering if it is related to your problem with subjective adjectives? Maybe a conversation between yourself and the person who diagnosed you can be beneficial towards figuring out if there is a link, because if there is, there may be good method for dealing with it.

learning disabilities. Well. I am fairly totally absolute middle skilled in everything. Everything I do. There is nothing I do bad and there is nothing I do good. Well that's kinda bad for me also because I can't back out myself in any thing I can do best. This might led to some depressions I had.

Most people only do good at things that they really enjoy and get passionate about. You may simply have not found that. Math, music, acting, gardening, raising pets, history, physics, programming, etc. are all examples of things that people find passion in and become good at.

syndromes. Earlier in this thread asperger's syndrom was called. Well this is the one I would describe myself most but still not very much. If I have such a thing I really know how to hide it.

etc. Well. Like asperger's syndrom suggests I have a tend to talk very professional. Might not seem to you that way but don't forget I am writing in a language I am not perfectly common with. This could be an indication for either called syndrom or high intelligence. Or some other things I did not think of such as trying to hide who I really am etc.

Asperger's is something that a psychologist in your area should be able to diagnose. I have seen the descriptions of asperger's and I haven't seen any strong indications that you might have it.

I really don't want to sound arrogant but to say what I think I might have to. I simply did not meet many people reaching my level of intelligence. Lets just say the following: I did not meet many people thinking the same way I do.
Thats less arrogant and demeaning so I'll stick with that one. Whether this thinking the way I do is a sign of intelligence or not I really can't tell but from my point of view it seems like. Well thats kinda obvious but anyway.

Why are you so concerned with intelligence and people who may think the way you do?

What would psycologists do besides craping in my brain? Well they won't analyse my brain cause they simply don't have necessary equipment in my region...

A psychologists job is to understand why certain things are problems for you and help you address them. They can certainly help you understand your issue with adjectives if you explore it with them. They can also better understand the source of your depression. If they thing that there are underlying physical problems that are manifesting themselves in cognitive issues then they can recommend you to various specialists who do have the equipment for diagnosis and / or treatment.

...and I am changing the way I act clockwise around a an object in 1 dimensional space. Just want to say I do it really often and depending on like fluctuating mass near the big bang assumed that the universe has enough mass to collaps after a time and creates a new big bang because the nothing is not capable of holding a mass of infinity. Well I thought of making a simpler description but I came up with a similar so I guess this is the best way for me to describe it.

This little blurb didn't really make sense and the way you introduced it into our conversation raised a very large red flag to me. There is a cognitive problem that develops in some people called schizophrenia. They way it affects people varies from person to person, but one of the symptoms that can occur in people is a thought process that produces statements like the ones I quoted above. If you see a psychologist, make a print out of our conversation and see what the psychologist thinks.
 
Back
Top