I am one of the most sexually harassed people here

Status
Not open for further replies.
jesus fucking christ
a goddamn non sequiter

shape the fuck up and grow a goddamn brain
you and your fucking clique will be the death of sciforums
 
TDI:

the definition of arbitrary. you caught yourself in a logical fallacy.

Exercising discretion is not the same as being arbitrary.

If moderating was an automatic process, we wouldn't need human moderators. Judgment is always necessary for a good moderator. One-size-fits-all makes for bad moderation.
 
Some idiot said:
The same rules should apply to everyone - across the board, with no exceptions. Anything else is a recipe for disaster.
Gustav said:
shut the fuck up and pay attention...
ok, you got me. I can't pretend that I fully agree with my own pronouncement. It sort of... flatly contradicts everything else I've said on the subject up until now. Well spotted. :wave:
[Varda's] persona's gotten hardcore
Has been for the duration of my stay, to be fair.
Gustav said:
those qualities are reserved for your allah
unfortunately, HE is persona non grata round these parts
HIS application for membership will be rejected
HE will be shot on sight
This is an analogy, right? :)

Anyway, I demand more arbitrariness. This is the problem: the mods aren't arbitrary enough. Moderation always follows the same old boring predictable pattern.

Surprise us, moderators. Everyone likes surprises.
 
TDI:



Exercising discretion is not the same as being arbitrary.

If moderating was an automatic process, we wouldn't need human moderators. Judgment is always necessary for a good moderator. One-size-fits-all makes for bad moderation.

arbitrary:

1. subject to individual will or judgment without restriction; contingent solely upon one's discretion: an arbitrary decision.

pretty well sums up what you are saying.... subject to whim, instead of a codified standard.
how many times have i done something ban-worthy without it happening?
who knows, but my continued presence here is due to arbitrary inaction.
 
Anyway, I demand more arbitrariness. This is the problem: the mods aren't arbitrary enough. Moderation always follows the same old boring predictable pattern.

Surprise us, moderators. Everyone likes surprises.

Complete nonsense, I dream up one arbitrary moderation tool nearly every month. :mad:
 
The Devil Inside under the new rules of arbitory moderation im banning you because you have an ugly avatar:p
 
Asgaurd said:
The Devil Inside under the new rules of arbitory moderation im banning you because you have an ugly avatar
Now that's what I'm talking about.
icon14.gif


He's probably joking though.
icon13.gif
 
As part of my monthly arbitration, I am randomly assigning members to two fantasy groups. What I will do with them will be revealed later :mufc:
 
Maybe I'll make it four fantasy groups, we could have debate wars on ridiculous topics. :D
 
Anyway, I demand more arbitrariness. This is the problem: the mods aren't arbitrary enough. Moderation always follows the same old boring predictable pattern.

Surprise us, moderators. Everyone likes surprises.
My turn.

Varda, I love that nice curve you have between metothorax and abdomen. I would very much love to see Malpighian tubes of yours.

Now, whoever considers this as a sexual harassment will be banned immediately. Ha!
 
My turn.

Varda, I love that nice curve you have between metothorax and abdomen. I would very much love to see Malpighian tubes of yours.

Now, whoever considers this as a sexual harassment will be banned immediately. Ha!

I didn´t know you were into sex with insects , pervert !!!! :p:m:
 

OK,Ok..... I am only joking ..........anyway , since Varda´s avatar is a bug ...... ahemmm ....some insect ...... then some smart american lawyer could sue for harassing the person indirectly , through her avatar ........
Of course every sane person here know you are not ...... ;)

Here is a nice photo of a KISSING bug ..... sounds sexual too :

kissingbugfe4.jpg


It carries a disease , which can not be fully cured even today ...........
Chagas disease .........
 
The problem as I see it, is that Varda got banned for a remark to Sam ........ a remark that none of the users found appalling .......... would it be correct to ask SAM if she were offended before banning Varda ....... ?? ... I mean if the language is not so foul ,that young people must be protected on this family site ......
Look at me insulting Varda here ..... I think we both laughed at it :

http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=1845845&postcount=272

And I just called Plazma a pervert ....... I meant both posts in a positive joking way ....
and I think everybody understood that ..... but if someone reports me .... a ban ????
Some mods have more sense of humour than others , some members here have more sense of humour than others .......... are those without a sense of humour , and with concrete thinking going to decide what we write ... I am only asking ...:confused:
I still remember Redarmy11 and Varda in some old thread being banned for joking with each other ...........:rolleyes:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top