I am one of the most sexually harassed people here

Status
Not open for further replies.
Nope, because I know you meant it kindly and possibly were missing some cock yourself. ;)

Of course, does not mean I would not be offended by another person saying it, or that another person may not be offended by you saying it to them.
 
S.A.M. said:
Then I come across for example, a troll post or a flame that I know will throw the thread off track. I delete the post.
Click to expand...

Hmmm, you don't delete your own troll posts or flames that throw numerous threads off track? Curious... :scratchin:
 
Members complaining about apparently "arbitrary" moderation ought to realise that sciforums is a big site. No moderator can be expected to read every word written here, or review every post, or even read every thread. Certainly, I do not do so - nor would I want to.

I banned somebody for sexually harassing SAM. Why? Because it is clearly against the site posting guidelines; the member involved quite clearly knew this but went ahead anyway (not to mention that this is a repeat offender who ought to have learnt something by now); I read that particular thread and so noticed the breach; I decided to act on this to send a(nother) message to the particular member concerned and to others who read the thread and might consider doing the same thing in future.

There's no mystery here. There's no grand conspiracy. It's common sense stuff. If I see something clearly in breach of the site rules, I will take action as I see fit. Members can't pretend they don't know what is expected of them. The fact that some get away with things from time to time is just good luck for them. By far the most likely explanation is simply that no moderator has seen their bad behaviour, or decided to act on it. Moreover, chances are that nobody hit the "report" button. I can assure you that I review every complaint sent using the "report" function. If you want to draw something to my attention, that's the way to do it. Don't wait 6 weeks then post a whiney thread complaining how the moderator is biased.
 
I just found it that one day I get reported for doing something that everyone does everyday.

It is impossible for you to never have noticed harassment before. Not if you read Sciforums at all.
 
The bottom line is: if you want action, hit the "report" button. That will at least guarantee that somebody will be aware of your complaint.
 
hmm
i wonder if the bug lady considers me as a harasser of her extreme hotness

funny how noobs never seem to persevere with the mods
back in the day the community were the intellects and mods the retards
its flipped now
guess that is a good thing
 
James R said:
Members complaining about apparently "arbitrary" moderation ought to realise that sciforums is a big site. No moderator can be expected to read every word written here, or review every post, or even read every thread. Certainly, I do not do so - nor would I want to.

I banned somebody for sexually harassing SAM. Why? Because it is clearly against the site posting guidelines; the member involved quite clearly knew this but went ahead anyway (not to mention that this is a repeat offender who ought to have learnt something by now); I read that particular thread and so noticed the breach; I decided to act on this to send a(nother) message to the particular member concerned and to others who read the thread and might consider doing the same thing in future.

There's no mystery here. There's no grand conspiracy. It's common sense stuff. If I see something clearly in breach of the site rules, I will take action as I see fit. Members can't pretend they don't know what is expected of them. The fact that some get away with things from time to time is just good luck for them. By far the most likely explanation is simply that no moderator has seen their bad behaviour, or decided to act on it. Moreover, chances are that nobody hit the "report" button. I can assure you that I review every complaint sent using the "report" function. If you want to draw something to my attention, that's the way to do it. Don't wait 6 weeks then post a whiney thread complaining how the moderator is biased.
Click to expand...

the definition of arbitrary. you caught yourself in a logical fallacy.
 
S.A.M. said:
Yeah I guess. :)
When redarmy makes fun of a member its not the same as when shorty does it, for instance. That can't be avoided, I think.
Click to expand...
Why? :confused:

The same rules should apply to everyone - across the board, with no exceptions.

Anything else is a recipe for disaster.
 
EmmZ said:
Woah, that's sickening. It's just a funny joke to most men though. I'm sorry if that statement seems to need a huge yardbrush for its sweeping generalisation but I've seen no one call people on sexism. I've seen people write post upon post about women this and women that, but nothing is ever modded. I do think racism is taken more seriously. What are the people in power going to do about it?
Click to expand...

Yup.

Also, if someone posts sexism against women that's seen as just a bit of an un-PC joke, but if the equivalent was posted about men the author would be seen as a man-hating feminist.

So basically if a female is anything other than a doormat who loves being harassed, she's going to get labelled a man hating feminist.
 
I have spent years waiting to be sexually harrased by a woman but I have had no luck so far. Any horny girls out there who will overlook my unattractive appearance and my infirmities ? I shall await a pm .
 
Gustav said:
hmm
i wonder if the bug lady considers me as a harasser of her extreme hotness

funny how noobs never seem to persevere with the mods
back in the day the community were the intellects and mods the retards
its flipped now
guess that is a good thing
Click to expand...

did you just call me a n00b and a retard?

REPORTED

:D
 
The Devil Inside said:
the definition of arbitrary. you caught yourself in a logical fallacy.
Click to expand...


you stupid fuck
consider this
"as james sees fit" is righteous and fair more often than not
the "not" is typically addressed and subsequently resolved
admins are, by the very def of the term, are "decision" makers

now
filthy noob
arbitrary=logical fallacy

show me or suffer a horrendous and blood drenched fate

redarmy11 said:
Why? :confused:

The same rules should apply to everyone - across the board, with no exceptions.

Anything else is a recipe for disaster.
Click to expand...


shut the fuck up and pay attention...

James R said:
There's no mystery here. There's no grand conspiracy. It's common sense stuff. If I see something clearly in breach of the site rules, I will take action as I see fit. Members can't pretend they don't know what is expected of them. The fact that some get away with things from time to time is just good luck for them. By far the most likely explanation is simply that no moderator has seen their bad behaviour, or decided to act on it.
Click to expand...


however
know this

fucktards will face an enhanced scrutiny
as it should be
some peeps actually give a damn about this board
those that dont
fuck off

S.A.M. said:
Thats what we're doing now. :shrug:
Click to expand...

stfu :)
you aint doing no such thing
as the mighty jamesr indicated, mods are neither omnipotent nor omniscience
those qualities are reserved for your allah
unfortunately, HE is persona non grata round these parts
HIS application for membership will be rejected
HE will be shot on sight
 
Last edited:
bah
i have to go chase ducks outta my pool
they fucking shat in it

i can see the goddamn turds!

/woe is me
 
Gustav said:
your persona's gotten hardcore
i imagine you've got comfortable here

either that or your marriage is on the rocks
and you need a hard porking

/IMO
Click to expand...

Not at all, she's just getting accustomed to US policy ;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top