Hullo

[Yerda Puntzavon]

Is this where new people say hi? Hi. I'm a new people.

I was on another forum and there's a guy there who is a bit...bonkers. Got banned from here. Very unhappy about it. I reasoned you must all be alright, so now I'm here.

 

[Beer w/Straw]

Ask Janes R.

Or, what did this person du?

 

[Michael 345]

I'm a new people.

Hullo hi new people

How many of you are there please?

 

[exchemist]

Is this where new people say hi? Hi. I'm a new people.

I was on another forum and there's a guy there who is a bit...bonkers. Got banned from here. Very unhappy about it. I reasoned you must all be alright, so now I'm here.

Hullo Yerda.

You refer to Spellbound, a.k.a. Ostromonos, a.k.a.epicurus splendicus, I take it. As this is a science forum, it's tolerance for nutty pseudoscience is a little less than on RF. But only a little. It takes quite a while to get excreted from here. Spellbound worked assiduously at it for months, if not years. This forum in not very lively, it's fair to say. It was much more so in the past, but science forums generally have seen a drop off in participation in the last decade.

 

[Beer w/Straw]

little less than on RF

What is RF, or can I just Google that?

 

[exchemist]

What is RF, or can I just Google that?

Religious Forums, though it has sizeable sections on lots of other topics too. It's very American-dominated and has a lot about US politics, some of which is interesting to me as an outsider.

 

[sideshowbob]

I reasoned you must all be alright, so now I'm here.

Your reasoning may be off. Some of us are a bit bonkers here too.

 

[exchemist]

Your reasoning may be off. Some of us are a bit bonkers here too.

Speaking of which, Theorist seems to be on the loose again. He's just popped up on another science forum, under the name Ned. I expect he may materialise here once he gets banned there.................which I am working on.

 

[RainbowSingularity]

Hi & Welcome

 

[Yerda Puntzavon]

Hullo Yerda.

You refer to Spellbound, a.k.a. Ostromonos, a.k.a.epicurus splendicus, I take it. As this is a science forum, it's tolerance for nutty pseudoscience is a little less than on RF. But only a little. It takes quite a while to get excreted from here. Spellbound worked assiduously at it for months, if not years. This forum in not very lively, it's fair to say. It was much more so in the past, but science forums generally have seen a drop off in participation in the last decade.

I see. I see. He seems alright, just a total spacecake.

It's nice to see a familiar username.

Hullo hi new people

How many of you are there please?

Eh, there's me, myself, I and I think that's it. So 4 and we're all good at counting.

Your reasoning may be off. Some of us are a bit bonkers here too.

This is what I like if I'm honest.

Hi & Welcome

Thanks. Hello.

 

[Michael 345]

My question comes from your introduction

Hi. I'm a new people.

Hi. I'm a new people. Which gives the impression there are more than one of yourself

Your reply of, in part me, myself, I and I think good come back , but does raise more questions

Is me, myself, I and I think ..... So 4

Eh, there's me, myself, I and I think that's it. So 4 and we're all good at counting.

Are you counting I think as 1? If so 4 would be correct, otherwise 3 should be the answer (me, myself, I)

Anyway welcome