how it works?

Acceleration x volume x time? That leaves you with $$\frac{m^4}{s}$$, what is that suppose to be?

Are you just trolling here or is there something you want to discuss?
 
$$m^4$$ is nonsense in a physical sense. Mathematically you can take 1 m and raise it to the 4th power and it would give $$1 m^4$$
 
ethernos said:
in non physical sense does it make sense?
Click to expand...
I have no idea how to respond to that.
Try this, write out 3 - 5 complete sentences that describe what it is you are trying to discover.
 
Thread reported with request for it to go to the cesspool.

Nothing Ethernos has posted makes any sense whatsoever.
 
Lets give this one last chance:

Ethernos - what, exactly, are you trying to do? Is this a math problem from your homework?
 
ethernos said:
no! sorry. what i actually tried to ask was "could volume be reduced or increased due to acceleration and time?"
Click to expand...

The only way I can think of off the top of my head for acceleration/deceleration to affect volume would be through resistance causing an increase in temperature in a substance resulting in a state change from liquid to gas (which would result in an increase in volume for a given mass).

Beyond that, I don't believe it does - someone with a deeper physics background could probably explain better.

As for time - again, I don't believe the passing of time itself affects volume. It could indirectly, via decomposition and the like.
 
hansda said:
If this object is accelerated to a relativistic speed, its volume will decrease as per Lorentz length reduction.
Click to expand...

I was under the impression that Lorentz Length Reduction was only based on the stationary outside observer, not the "actual" length? Eg, a co-moving object within the vessels rest frame will not notice a reduction in length, and thus would not note a reduction in volume. As a result, the "actual" volume of the vessel would not decrease (ergo, if you have a vessel of one cubic meter full of water, and accelerate it to 90% the speed of light, water would not "spill out" due to Lorentz Reduction).
 
Kittamaru,

Kittamaru said:
I was under the impression that Lorentz Length Reduction was only based on the stationary outside observer, not the "actual" length? Eg, a co-moving object within the vessels rest frame will not notice a reduction in length, and thus would not note a reduction in volume. As a result, the "actual" volume of the vessel would not decrease (ergo, if you have a vessel of one cubic meter full of water, and accelerate it to 90% the speed of light, water would not "spill out" due to Lorentz Reduction).
Click to expand...

See this link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Length_contraction . When the electron travels at 0.0447c, its contracted length is 99.9% of the length at rest. At 0.141c the contracted length is 99%. So, you can see as the relativistic speed of electron increases its length reduces. This length reduction will cause a volume reduction.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top