Challenger78
Valued Senior Member
Hugo Chavez shut down radio stations that were openly calling out for his blood and serving as the information/propaganda arm of the people who plotted for his coup, the same people who willingly ignored the fact that he was democratically elected. (http://links.org.au/node/1182).
Now, Barrack Obama in theory is attempting either control or shut down fox, because it is in fact the pseudo leadership/propaganda party of the GOP. People outside and inside the US have known this for a while. (Robert Greenwald: Outfoxed)
Would you protect someone's right to free speech, if it meant that they would call for your blood ?
Is Fox news, comparable to the radio and TV stations that actively campaigned against Hugo Chavez ?
I don't think so, but it does give one pause for thought. Because, if any radio or TV station in the US did what the Venezuelan ones did to Chavez, There would be blood on the streets.
Is it then only a matter of time before Fox starts doing that?
How far does the freedom of press go ?, Would you protect a station that calls for genocide or a coup ? Extreme cases, but if cloaked under the pretense of "opinion" which is then advertised extensively, isn't it a bit to far to protect your "political" killers or those that would incite your political opponents ?
Now, Barrack Obama in theory is attempting either control or shut down fox, because it is in fact the pseudo leadership/propaganda party of the GOP. People outside and inside the US have known this for a while. (Robert Greenwald: Outfoxed)
Would you protect someone's right to free speech, if it meant that they would call for your blood ?
Is Fox news, comparable to the radio and TV stations that actively campaigned against Hugo Chavez ?
I don't think so, but it does give one pause for thought. Because, if any radio or TV station in the US did what the Venezuelan ones did to Chavez, There would be blood on the streets.
Is it then only a matter of time before Fox starts doing that?
How far does the freedom of press go ?, Would you protect a station that calls for genocide or a coup ? Extreme cases, but if cloaked under the pretense of "opinion" which is then advertised extensively, isn't it a bit to far to protect your "political" killers or those that would incite your political opponents ?