Hiroshima-nagasaki

[ginger]

Is time-travel possible? Like as the concepts described in movie- 'back to the future'! In world war 2, i feel that it was impossible to built nuclear weapons of high impact magnitude covering a wide area. In 1940s there were not even ICBMs, nor any capable planes to payload and attack at precision. So i think in 1965s US, china etc might had decided to sent a nuke thru time travel in 1940s carried by an F-15. Like also shown in movie 'terminator'. Even in 911, the planes might had appeared from nowhere in the sky. What do you say?

 

[Read-Only]

Is time-travel possible? Like as the concepts described in movie- 'back to the future'! In world war 2, i feel that it was impossible to built nuclear weapons of high impact magnitude covering a wide area. In 1940s there were not even ICBMs, nor any capable planes to payload and attack at precision. So i think in 1965s US, china etc might had decided to sent a nuke thru time travel in 1940s carried by an F-15. Like also shown in movie 'terminator'. Even in 911, the planes might had appeared from nowhere in the sky. What do you say?

I thin you are being silly. The development of the A-bomb is WELL documented, the Norden Bombsight made aerial bombing VERY precise and the planes of the day were certainly capable of carrying a single nuclear device.

In other words, I think you must be a fairly young person without any real knowledge of history. That's because you seem totally unaware of the facts I just listed.

 

[ginger]

Hmmm

The norden sight was used in ww1 bomber planes which used to fly at lower altitude, slow acceleration and never had elevation. B-52s came in 1958s which were using inaccurate norden sights. There were not even anti-radiation coatings in ww2 planes.

 

[Repo Man]

There is more to being a proper troll than randomly typing gibberish you know.

 

[kenworth]

luckily i traveled back in time,witnessed the events and can verify that there was nothing suspicious about them.

 

[Dywyddyr]

The norden sight was used in ww1 bomber planes which used to fly at lower altitude, slow acceleration and never had elevation. B-52s came in 1958s which were using inaccurate norden sights. There were not even anti-radiation coatings in ww2 planes.

The Norden was used in WW2, not WW1.
Lower altitude, slower speeds than what? And what do you mean "elevation"?
What do B-52s have to do with it?
Or anti-radiation coatings?

 

[Read-Only]

The Norden was used in WW2, not WW1.
Lower altitude, slower speeds than what? And what do you mean "elevation"?
What do B-52s have to do with it?
Or anti-radiation coatings?

As I said earlier, I think we're dealing with a rather young, foolish person here.

It's one thing to enjoy science fiction (and I do, myself) but quite another to actually believe in it !!

 

[draqon]

It would be highly energy prohibitive to send anything back in time for a such silly notion. If I was part of a future civilization and decided to do something as that...I would send thoughts instead of material back in time, less energy. Imagine a thought sent back in time into minds of people of 1950's...a thought to create nuclear bombs and use them, a thought to start the space age, and give rise to the electronics age. That would be more prudent.

 

[Read-Only]

It would be highly energy prohibitive to send anything back in time for a such silly notion. If I was part of a future civilization and decided to do something as that...I would send thoughts instead of material back in time, less energy. Imagine a thought sent back in time into minds of people of 1950's...a thought to create nuclear bombs and use them, a thought to start the space age, and give rise to the electronics age. That would be more prudent.

The 1950s? Yeah, sure. You'd be too late on ALL of those!!

(Where did you study the history of technology anyway, Moscow?)

 

[Dywyddyr]

As I said earlier, I think we're dealing with a rather young, foolish person here.

Yep.

It's one thing to enjoy science fiction (and I do, myself) but quite another to actually believe in it !!

As do I. But I like my science fiction to be at least plausible.
Everyone knows that Hiroshima was the result of ghost exploding when it came into contact with a deck of tarot cards.

 

[Read-Only]

Yep.


As do I. But I like my science fiction to be at least plausible.
Everyone knows that Hiroshima was the result of ghost exploding when it came into contact with a deck of tarot cards.

Ouch! I'm forever getting that wrong - I keep thinking the ghost was actually that battleship from the Philadelphia Experiment. Thanks for setting me straight again.