The theoretical Higgs field can never be seen or found because it exists in the fourth dimension
You've misunderstood what dimensions mean in physics. They
don't mean 'parallel universes', as they do in science fiction stories. Physicists
never say "It is in another dimension" as if a particle or object is in a different universe.
Saying "It is in the 4th dimension!" is like saying "It is in up and down!" or "It is it left and right!". It's meaningless. Extra dimensions are extra directions to move, objects have other directions they can move around in. It is
not extra universes.
and is the same thing we perceive as Dark Matter.
There are fundamental differences between the properties of dark matter and whatever facilitates the Higgs mechanism.
Black Holes theoretically dont exist but are points in space where the energy from within a massive imploding star is not in fact imploding into itself at all. Hypothetically, the energy generated from the massive star has reached such high temperatures, the fusion reaction within the star causes the particles within to accelerate to speeds exceeding the speed of light which ultimately causes them to phase into that illusive fourth dimension to join the rest of the invisible dark matter.
Black holes have nothing to do with the temperatures the stars which formed them had. The properties of a black hole depend only on the original star's mass, charge and spin. While a star is hot it can maintain itself from gravitational collapse, it won't form a black hole. Black holes form from stars when they cannot burn any more fuel and they cool down.
As for shifting into another dimension, see my first response.
In this fourth dimension,gravity is the predominate force and has a much weaker effect within our visible three dimensions because gravitons are the only particle that can move between dimensions.
I suspect you're trying to borrow concepts from string theory to do with gravitons being able to leave the 3-brane other particles which make up physical objects are trapped on. You're still misunderstanding what extra dimensions mean, the 4th dimension is not a spatial one (it is time) and that doesn't explain anything to do with the Higgs mechanism.
Their quarks move faster than the speed of light which is why they phase between our dimensions and the fourth aloowing greater effect in the invisible fourth dimension and little effect in our three.
Obviously you were previously just making stuff up but now you're just
really making nonsense up. Moving faster than light isn't consistent with anything theoretical or observed which is viable physics. Even in string theory where the notion of being 'trapped on a brane' is a viable one quarks (which are actually the ends of open strings stuck to the brane) move slower than light. This wouldn't have any effect on the dimensions anyway.
This leads me to deduce that the infamous Higgs Bason's are in fact the quarks of gravitons(Dark Matter) or the "strings," connecting them and would make gravitons, having their majority of mass in the fourth dimension, the fundamental force that allows all mass to congeal and evolve into all matter.
So you
have been borrowing ideas from string theory and just not understanding it.
This is just my theory explaining mass, however I do not have the math to back it up and no one listens to theories non-supported with mathematical evidense.
No one listens to something obviously just pulled from either a certain part of your body or borrowed and butchered from legit research. You've completely failed to understand the concept of dimensions, extra dimensions, branes, strings, the Higgs, dark matter, quarks and gravitons. There's numerous reasons why what you say is nonsense, I've already covered the dimensions thing. Here's a few more specific ones :
You say dark matter is the quarks of gravitons. That's meaningless, it is like saying "The electrons of photons". Quarks are quarks, they aren't quarks
of anything. You also say these quarks are the Higgs boson. The Higgs
boson is a
boson, quarks are fermions, they cannot be the same. It is possible to build a Higgs mechanism facilitator from quarks, via technicolour, but it is a composite of quarks which makes the scalar object which facilitates the Higgs mechanism, not individual quarks. Dark matter must be stable, it's a major challenge in supersymmetric models to have the lightest particle to be stable. The Higgs boson isn't stable and thus it cannot be dark matter, it would all decay away.
You've obviously borrowed from the string theory concept of having quark pairs (ie mesons) be an open string with ends stuck to a brane, with the rest of the string protruding in an orthogonal direction. This doesn't mean quarks are the strings, the quarks are the
end points on the strings stuck to the brane. The string in between acts like a gluon flux tube and provides the correct energy scaling properties to account for meson cohesion.
I know it's 'cool' to talk about extra dimensions, the Higgs boson, gravitons, dark matter etc but just stealing ideas and then mashing them into something which sounds impressive to a 15 year old high school student
isn't how you go about it. You call it a 'theory' but what you really have is a random, unsupported, unjustified hypothesis which cannot be developed, cannot be tested and is riddled with conceptual misunderstandings. If you really want to get into this area of scientific research then my advice would be to get yourself a 1st year undergraduate textbook on vector calculus and get learning. Then follow it up with linear algebra, partial differential equations, classical mechanics, electromagnetism and
then you can start touching on things like quantum mechanics. Until you have the basic grounding in mathematics you won't be able to do anything concrete with any of the concepts mentioned in this thread. Yes. unfortunately it's a long road, it takes most people the better part of a decade to go from high school graduate to researcher, but it is worth it.
Trying to skip to the end and say "I haven't done the maths" is missing the point and will ultimately get you nowhere. This forum (and many others) is littered with people who didn't want to put the effort in to learn the details and just want to talk about the 'cool topics'.
None of them contribute anything to science. Don't let this happen to you if you're really serious about this stuff.