I agree that the Israel/Palestinian situation is a threat to world peace, but I don't agree that the Israelis are solely to blame. I think the UN should be occupying Palestinian territories so Israel doesn't have to do it.
I agree that the Israel/Palestinian situation is a threat to world peace, but I don't agree that the Israelis are solely to blame. I think the UN should be occupying Palestinian territories so Israel doesn't have to do it.
The borders after the War of Independence were much larger than now! They gave much of that back. Do you mean '67? Two states are more realistic. Maybe some hundred of years in the future, they will tear down the wall, as with East and West Germany.
I might be mistaken, now that I think about it. Israel captured more land in 67, then returned it soon afterwards.
Neither do Russia and Latvia. You are catching a rare glimpse into S.A.M.'s mind, hehe.
Does the last image show more land to you?
Those images don't represent every gain and return.
I'm sure you could find it. In any case, either the '67 borders or the original UN partition plan is acceptable to me, for whatever that's worth.
I just wondered how the situation had changed from 2000. I've only been following this stuff for a few years after I met a Palestinian and then got interested in the issue.
2004 I think.
The same thing could be said of the Arabs then? It seems that it's a case of winner take all. I mean, you're arguing it was Arab land and then you say well it was Egyptian land ...And before that, it belonged to the Kingdom of Egypt. Your point?
The solution? Simple. Don't let them live with each other. The Jews can go back to Europe where they came from, and the Arabs (of all religions) can stake a claim to what was once rightfully theirs.
The same thing could be said of the Arabs then? It seems that it's a case of winner take all. I mean, you're arguing it was Arab land and then you say well it was Egyptian land ...
The only solution is to draw up the lines as they are now and be done with it.
The same thing could be said of the Arabs then? It seems that it's a case of winner take all. I mean, you're arguing it was Arab land and then you say well it was Egyptian land ...
The only solution is to draw up the lines as they are now and be done with it.
That was a question of ethics.Turkey is more powerful nation than Greece, so no Istanbul should not be returned because Turkey got what it takes to protect it.
Well that's just not going to happen any sooner than Native American are going to be given back their land. Right? So, draw the lines are they are now.