Thank you for the word error correction, so a graviton is not really a proven thing?
Gravity question.
- Thread starter theorist-constant12345
- Start date
- Status
Not yet.
Im not immune to learning, and some days I am willing to learn. But i may also ask stupid questions.
After a closer, look at the thread and your posts it is more likely you are just not getting the answers you want.., and don't have sufficient understanding of the science to understand the answers you have received.
The whole thread should be moved to Alternative Theories, Pseudoscience or even just locked. It does not appear you are interested in the science.
Several years, sometimes from dawn till well after dusk, and you think im not interested in science.
This is a questions thread, and im trying to get it back on track, thanks
We have yet to see you learn anything.
Yes I have seen it, and it is pure unadulterated rubbish.
But of course I'll wait for you to gather what evidence you can [observational and experimental] and get it properly peer reviewed.
You could then be in line for next year's Physics Nobel [tic mode on]
Towards the center of the milky way.
Time is real measureable natural phenomena. We build theoretical models to make predictions associated with natural phenomena and then we make empirical measurements to test those predictions. For time we measure the tick ratio between clocks in different frames of reference. The GPS is a perfect example of that. If time wasn't real natural phenomena then we wouldn't need to make any adjustments to sychonize the tick rates between the earth based clock and the satellite clock. You clearly don't understand physics so why are you arguing about something you don't understand? You feel the need to be right regardless the consequence that you won't learn anything? You're being told this but you're not listening. Ignorance is a choice.
Also toward every planet in the solar system, but by a tiny amount.
This about the 7th time I have gone over gravity, I re-check the knowledge over and over, what would you like to know about gravity. I can tell you your knowledge back, so when I ask a question, I want an answer from you , not an answer someone else gave in history. None of the answers in this thread are even your own answers, they are reciting back information.
All you have defined so far, it that time and space is an abacus, I will not go through and quote all the recites, but this is what you are saying.
Gps and gravity, a delay by curvature, curves having more distance than a linear, refraction delay, and also a 28 minutes difference from Philae.
I ask again what is the curvature of space made of, time is not a physical thing, and there is no physical thing in empty space, the only thing there is to distort, is energy, the curvature of space is a curvature of the suns output,
there is nothing else to curve unless you can explain it better than just of being a geometric abacus?
Last edited:
Why are the other solar systems not falling towards the center?
Centripetal acceleration explains the orbit, but does not explain why we no not drop below the sun, or do we?
danshawen
Valued Senior Member
Our Sun can be said to fall or wobble in a small circle or ellipse about the approximate "center of mass" of the Sun-Jupiter, Sun-otherplanets system. For the most part, this center of mass of the entire solar system is interior to the distributed mass of the Sun.
The center of mass of our entire solar system is also falling along with billions of other stars and all of their associated moons and planets about the approximate center of the Milky Way galaxy. This condition is also subject to gradual change as the Andromeda galaxy approaches ours. Notice that the observed relative motions vary considerably with whatever is chosen as origin. No mentioned inertial mass anywhere is nailed to a fixed position, regardless of the magnitude of its associated inertial mass, relative motion, or any imposed geometrical preferences associated with any mathematical generalization.
"Why are the other solar systems not falling towards the center?" What other solar systems? Center of what?
"Centripetal acceleration explains the orbit…" Not really. Force diagrams NEVER "explain" the cause of the forces they represent; only the magnitudes, directions, and resultant. A comet with a sufficiently long orbital period may be captured by the Sun. The Earth isn't in that situation, at least until the Sun itself transforms into a red giant in a few billion years.
Say.. this isn't just Machello on one of his rants again, is it?
The center of mass of our entire solar system is also falling along with billions of other stars and all of their associated moons and planets about the approximate center of the Milky Way galaxy. This condition is also subject to gradual change as the Andromeda galaxy approaches ours. Notice that the observed relative motions vary considerably with whatever is chosen as origin. No mentioned inertial mass anywhere is nailed to a fixed position, regardless of the magnitude of its associated inertial mass, relative motion, or any imposed geometrical preferences associated with any mathematical generalization.
"Why are the other solar systems not falling towards the center?" What other solar systems? Center of what?
"Centripetal acceleration explains the orbit…" Not really. Force diagrams NEVER "explain" the cause of the forces they represent; only the magnitudes, directions, and resultant. A comet with a sufficiently long orbital period may be captured by the Sun. The Earth isn't in that situation, at least until the Sun itself transforms into a red giant in a few billion years.
Say.. this isn't just Machello on one of his rants again, is it?
Center of what? All behave the same way so all solar systems in our galaxy are falling toward the center of the galaxy.
What do you mean by "below"? Relative to what reference?
Since you are repeating the same apparent wrongness you said before without appearing to have absorbed any of the previous discussion it would seem you are probably just trolling it. You may know the truth, but you certainly are behaving like you do not and are messing up very basic principles, which seems unlikely. And you are stating the questions in what appears to be a purposely incomplete way, implying intentional coyness (trolling).
Last edited:
The Sun orbits the centre of our galaxy, the Milky Way. In the same way that the Earth falls towards the Sun (i.e. moves away from the straight-line motion it would have if the Sun wasn't there), the Sun falls towards the centre of the galaxy.
exchemist
Valued Senior Member
What do you mean by "below"? How can you have "below" if there is no "up" or "down"?
Well that is an indication that you don't even know how to discuss science, much less understand what you are discussing. That's a big, big problem. Since no one in here authored the theories we're discussing, the correct way to discuss them is to cite the works of the people who did.
You were given the answer. It isn't our fault if you don't understand or like it.
Correct.
They are.
We are always falling towards the Sun. We also have velocity which attempts to move us in a straight line. The result is what we call an "orbit." Note that from the perspective of the Earth we are moving in a straight line, but space is curved by the presence of the Sun, so a straight line from our perspective is a curve from the perspective of an outside observer.
The seventh time you've come up with your usual ignorant garbage.
- Status