R
Redoubtable
Guest
Though I'm not certain about this, it seems rather absurd that a supreme divinity would make humans with toes.
I mean to say, if the Fundamentalist/Creationists were to be right, why would God have made such useless extremities in a basically static being?
If no evolution has transpired, then toes cannot be vestigial: they cannot be the phyiological residue of an unthinkably ancient simian past.
But why then? To what purpose would a God make them?
To vex the observant and sensitive? To pick on humans in general? Mayhap Satan made them himself?
I realize that excessive structures in other creatures, like aquatic mammals, are regarded as vestigial and as evidence for evolution. However, it seems sensible to stick to the toes, as they are the nearest, and, perhaps, the most pertinent example.
Don't tell me that you need your toes to grab items for which you're too indolent to lean over: you don't.
I mean to say, if the Fundamentalist/Creationists were to be right, why would God have made such useless extremities in a basically static being?
If no evolution has transpired, then toes cannot be vestigial: they cannot be the phyiological residue of an unthinkably ancient simian past.
But why then? To what purpose would a God make them?
To vex the observant and sensitive? To pick on humans in general? Mayhap Satan made them himself?
I realize that excessive structures in other creatures, like aquatic mammals, are regarded as vestigial and as evidence for evolution. However, it seems sensible to stick to the toes, as they are the nearest, and, perhaps, the most pertinent example.
Don't tell me that you need your toes to grab items for which you're too indolent to lean over: you don't.