Genetically modified food is a staple in some developed countries except from the E.U. Meat producers in the United States distribute modified and enhanced meat to Americans and South Americans, while exporting the real stuff to Europeans. Apparently Europe has a higher standard when it comes to food and drug. What is your take on GMO's? Before you vote, take refuge on the fact that very little food left in the world has not be modified by hybridization or scientific enhancement. These procedures aren't even new; field staples like potatoes, tomatoes, and rice have been altered experimentally since the middle ages. There is very little organic food left in the world. The tomato we eat today looks well adjusted to moisture because it has been modified with Fish gene, which gives it a longer lasting shelf life. Scientists figured that costumers are after the appearance, not the taste of the tomato. If costumers were drawn to the natural taste of tomatoes, scientists will adjust the tomato's taste as well. In startling open statement, some scientists say it’s the consumer’s plight they are after. What they won't tell you is that many poultry die annually due to hormone intoxication. The bad news is that Americans aren't complaining, both North and South America. Americans don't even produce real cheese anymore; their position on GMO's is not entirely surprising. The reason why I ask this question is because my chemistry teacher brought it up in class. He wanted to know where the ethics line should be drawn, and the denaturing barrier regressed. So, where should there be a line drawn?