Free Will

Status
Not open for further replies.
When you think about it, everything we'll do is already planned. This is hard to explain, but everyone is born with certain DNA, and with a certain upbringing. Taking this into account, isn't it logical that if you asked an omniscient being what someone would do, they'd know. By the way, this isn't me trying to say anything about God, just the fact that everyone's choices and actions are pre-determined, so people thinking they can disobey fate are idiots, and everyone's life can already be seen before it happens, before they're even conceived, because everyone's actions are predictable. Noone can ever go against their DNA or personality, because that's who you are. I don't think I've done my thoughts justice with the words I've used, but I hope this is understandable.
 
[Originally Posted by thinking]
so then free-will is more than a concept , so free-will is a reality then

just to be clear , free-will is a reality [/quote]


???

Do try a little more so as to be clear.

the ability to question(s) by the self
 
Originally Posted by thinking

then the computer is programed to do so ?

...as we are...


the difference being in the complexity in our fundamental constituents of ourselves vitamins , minerals , proteins etc

a computer has only minerals

my point being is this

the more constituents that an object is made of , the closer you are to the Universe
 
the difference being in the complexity in our fundamental constituents of ourselves vitamins , minerals , proteins etc

a computer has only minerals
...



Regardless, compositional complexity was not part of your original criterion for free-will. According to your definition, a computer exhibits free-will.

With respect to the complexity and/or programming issue I urge you to look this up: Turing Test.

my point being is this

the more constituents that an object is made of , the closer you are to the Universe

Not sure what you mean here but, whatever relevance does this have to the concept of free-will?
 
Originally Posted by thinking
the difference being in the complexity in our fundamental constituents of ourselves vitamins , minerals , proteins etc

a computer has only minerals
... ”



Regardless, compositional complexity was not part of your original criterion for free-will. According to your definition, a computer exhibits free-will.

only by being programmed has the computer have the ability to do so

With respect to the complexity and/or programming issue I urge you to look this up: Turing Test.

I am aware of him

World War 2 History
 
Originally Posted by thinking
my point being is this

the more constituents that an object is made of , the closer you are to the Universe ”

Not sure what you mean here but, whatever relevance does this have to the concept of free-will?

inotherwords

the more constituents a being is made of the more free-will it has

a computer , no matter how much info it has or takes in , can be nothing more then the essence of what it is , silicon and the perspective of a silicon based thinking and thought object

a computer cannot ask a question unless asked by the programme , deliberately , a computer is a simple thing , it is not independent of the programmer
 
One will do 'x'. Freedom of this means that one should be without objection to what has been chosen. However the amount of determism relates to how strong the 'will' is. If this is true then determism is dependent upon will...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top