Former CIA analysts crusade for Palestine

Fukushi has been around for many a year. The moniker is more familiar to me than any you think he might be now.
 
My bad, for some reason his sig made me think he was someone else [along with the comment]
 
as a matter of fact, I was reading that other tread and just when I tought it was going somewhere, JamesR closed it up, so that's why I made the comment.

no offence :)
 
muersalt said:
Once you claim that a thing exists in a pure form despite many variations, the onus is on you to prove it.
Who is the final authority on what human rights entail, and where can I find him?
Click to expand...
I'm not sure what you are talking about, regarding people claiming "exists in a pure form",

but I'm comfortable with human rights being established by political effort, answering to reason with evidence, without (explicitly without, btw, in most cases of establishment) the installation of any "final authority" overall.
 
fedr808 said:
yah, giving the sinai to Egypt for starters, giving Gaza and the west bank to the arabs. Making peace with the kingdom of Jordan.
Click to expand...

No, not returning stolen goods, in terms of explicit overtures to Palestine. Like "lets share the land and be friends".
 
*Beep Beep*
Which Arabs?

*Beep Beep Beep*
Which temple?

*Beep*
The exile is a myth.

*BEEP BEEP BEEP*
The Palestinians are the original Jews.
 
It's all a mute point IMO. I've yet to hear SAM defend the Native Americans against further migration of Muslims (and other peoples).... :D
 
Michael said:
It's all a mute point IMO. I've yet to hear SAM defend the Native Americans against further migration of Muslims (and other peoples).... :D
Click to expand...

Why would native Americans need defending from migration? I believe you've migrated to Australia, are you occupying the Australians? Is there a reason why you are unable to distinguish the two?
 
S.A.M. said:
Why would native Americans need defending from migration? I believe you've migrated to Australia, are you occupying the Australians? Is there a reason why you are unable to distinguish the two?
Click to expand...

Well lets just say, India, 11th to the 17th centuries, and just maybe the Sudan.
 
Buffalo Roam said:
Well lets just say, India, 11th to the 17th centuries, and just maybe the Sudan.
Click to expand...

Are you really comparing the precolonial invasions to the population replacement carried out by Europeans? Just look at India today and the US today.

Which condition do you think the native Americans would prefer? Running their own country or being replaced by a foreign culture and peoples?
 
S.A.M. said:
Are you really comparing the precolonial invasions to the population replacement carried out by Europeans? Just look at India today and the US today.

Which condition do you think the native Americans would prefer? Running their own country or being replaced by a foreign culture and peoples?
Click to expand...

Funny thing SAM is that they are running their own country, and they have dual citizenship, the best of both world.

And guess what, even in India, they are voting with their feet and trying to move to America.
 
S.A.M. said:
Why would native Americans need defending from migration? I believe you've migrated to Australia, are you occupying the Australians? Is there a reason why you are unable to distinguish the two?
Click to expand...
You pick and choose what is right and what is wrong and your criteria is - if it's Muslims doing it, it's Glorious.

Europeans colonized the America's. European descendants control migration into and out of the Americans. Muslims, such as SAM, think it's fine to migrate and live on this European-descendant controlled post-colonized land. Until I mentioned it, it's probably never even occurred to that you migrating and living in the USA is a hypocritical act.

I see no difference with Israel. Same thing. Europeans colonized the land. Europeans control migration into the land.

I see no difference with Arabs colonizing Persia. Arabs colonized the land. Arabs controlled migration into the land.

Asians from the mainland colonized Japan. The Ainu lost control. "Japanese" now control the land.


It's the same story over and over.


Now, this is the thing.
I think forced colonization was wrong.
You don't.
That's the difference.

So, you should find yourself in good company with Zionists. You both see the glory in taking other people's land.

It's really quite simple,
Michael
 
Try again:

Why would native Americans need defending from migration? I believe you've migrated to Australia, are you occupying the Australians? Is there a reason why you are unable to distinguish the two?
Click to expand...

Buffalo Roam said:
Funny thing SAM is that they are running their own country, and they have dual citizenship, the best of both world.
Click to expand...

So if someone moved into your house and let you live in the bathtub but allowed you to use his mailing address, you'd consider it the best of both worlds?

You can respond in this thread I started on the subject:

http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=95954

And guess what, even in India, they are voting with their feet and trying to move to America.
Click to expand...

We have a billion people, there isn't a single country where Indians are not moving
 
Last edited:
S.A.M. said:
Try again:





So if someone moved into your house and let you live in the bathtub but allowed you to use his mailing address, you'd consider it the best of both worlds?

You can respond in this thread I started on the subject:

http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=95954



We have a billion people, there isn't a single country where Indians are not moving
Click to expand...

No SAM, it isn't try again, it is a heated fantasy, with no factual basis, a fever in your mind.

And why are they moving? because of the cesspool that India is and sinking deeper into.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top