Falcon Lake ufo encounter

[Magical Realist]

This incident in Canada seems very compelling. Not only is the eyewitness account very detailed with a sketch of the craft, but there's also ground trace evidence, burnt clothing, and severe physiological effects left on the eyewitness's body. See what you think:

And here's as close as I could find to an official skeptic debunk of this account. I'm not much impressed.

http://www.theironskeptic.com/articles/m...chalak.htm

 

[Michael 345]

And here's as close as I could find to an official skeptic debunk of this account. I'm not much impressed.

I'm not impressed with the debunking of the story

He could have made it so much more humourous

No sense of the ridiculous debunkers all straight and serious

 

[Baldeee]

And here's as close as I could find to an official skeptic debunk of this account. I'm not much impressed.

You mean you're not impressed that someone manages to come up with plausible alternative explanations that don't require the existence of actual aliens?
Or are you critiquing the style rather than the content?
What more would you need to be impressed?

 

[Magical Realist]

You mean you're not impressed that someone manages to come up with plausible alternative explanations that don't require the existence of actual aliens?
Or are you critiquing the style rather than the content?
What more would you need to be impressed?

No..I mean the critique doesn't debunk anything. The account remains intact with all its evidence.

 

[Baldeee]

No..I mean the critique doesn't debunk anything. The account remains intact with all its evidence.

True, it doesn't debunk it as far as showing that it couldn't be possibly be true, but it does do a very good job at showing that there are more likely alternative explanations.
Are you expecting people to have to prove claims wrong before you stop believing them?

 

[Magical Realist]

True, it doesn't debunk it as far as showing that it couldn't be possibly be true, but it does do a very good job at showing that there are more likely alternative explanations.
Are you expecting people to have to prove claims wrong before you stop believing them?

No..but on further research there are some questionable details. One is that the account was obtained thru hypnotic regression, which to me raises red flags. Also, the Mayo Clinic has no record of him ever being a patient. Third, the radiation on the landing site is linked to radium ore underground.