Recently, I've noticed a lot of songs that either have a direct quote saying that God exists, or an obscure one implying the existence of such.
This line here implies that the author feels "Why should I got o church if god doesn't exist? He must exist if I have to spend so much of my life dedicated to following his doctrine. He can't NOT exist"
Same song. So their lord also isnt the "Set up the universe then sit back and watch as humans skrew it up" one either. They beleive that God interferes with human fallibility, and actually gives half a damn as to what happens to us.
Closed minded christian fundamentalist. Do they NEED to just automatically dismiss anything that challenges their viewpoint? IS their faith so unstable that they can't even LOOK at evidence contrary to their belief system? Or is it that their faith is so strong that when they look at it they automagically dismiss it as false.
I guess that brings me to my point. I've heard the opinion expressed that God exists on the faith of his believers. I dont think this can be true, so anyone else who has heard it, dismiss it for the sake of this argument.
Lets assume that God is real. Not just the christian god, but all religions monotheistic and poletheistic. (1)
How is it that each religion has such a rich tapestry of myths and stories? Did one creative person sit around and come up with them all, or does each have a basis in truth, either exagerated, or left alone? Look at the bible, theres evidence of Noahs great flood (2), and the tower of bable(3). But these are also fully integrated into the myths and beliefs of a religion and culture that came previous to the rise of christianity. By Thousands of years. This was also polytheistic. Which religion is right? Did christianity steal ideas from this previous culture, or are they both talking about the same event, exageratted over time by each independently? I dont think so, the religions must be one and the same, just altered to appeal more to humanity as it is now, after all the unity we have suffered over the AD's.
Anyways, what makes christians have faith that their belief is correct? Or do you believe, as does Dictionary dot com that faith needs to basis other then the seeing, and believing, of what you see to be truth? How can the truth have the same value, but different meaning across cultures? Does this invalidate the truth of religion, or reinforce the belief?
(1) There are convincing arguments that christianity itself is polytheistic
(2) much smaller scale
(3)Babel or babylon?
BTW, this isnt an attempt to change anyones mind about what they believe in, or argue the christian viewpoint, it's just an expression of some opinions, and a simple question.
I'm not a slave, to a god, that doesnt exist
This line here implies that the author feels "Why should I got o church if god doesn't exist? He must exist if I have to spend so much of my life dedicated to following his doctrine. He can't NOT exist"
I'm not a slave to a lord that a doesnt give a shit
Same song. So their lord also isnt the "Set up the universe then sit back and watch as humans skrew it up" one either. They beleive that God interferes with human fallibility, and actually gives half a damn as to what happens to us.
Another Disident, take back you evidence, it has no power to deceive
Closed minded christian fundamentalist. Do they NEED to just automatically dismiss anything that challenges their viewpoint? IS their faith so unstable that they can't even LOOK at evidence contrary to their belief system? Or is it that their faith is so strong that when they look at it they automagically dismiss it as false.
I guess that brings me to my point. I've heard the opinion expressed that God exists on the faith of his believers. I dont think this can be true, so anyone else who has heard it, dismiss it for the sake of this argument.
Lets assume that God is real. Not just the christian god, but all religions monotheistic and poletheistic. (1)
How is it that each religion has such a rich tapestry of myths and stories? Did one creative person sit around and come up with them all, or does each have a basis in truth, either exagerated, or left alone? Look at the bible, theres evidence of Noahs great flood (2), and the tower of bable(3). But these are also fully integrated into the myths and beliefs of a religion and culture that came previous to the rise of christianity. By Thousands of years. This was also polytheistic. Which religion is right? Did christianity steal ideas from this previous culture, or are they both talking about the same event, exageratted over time by each independently? I dont think so, the religions must be one and the same, just altered to appeal more to humanity as it is now, after all the unity we have suffered over the AD's.
Anyways, what makes christians have faith that their belief is correct? Or do you believe, as does Dictionary dot com that faith needs to basis other then the seeing, and believing, of what you see to be truth? How can the truth have the same value, but different meaning across cultures? Does this invalidate the truth of religion, or reinforce the belief?
(1) There are convincing arguments that christianity itself is polytheistic
(2) much smaller scale
(3)Babel or babylon?
BTW, this isnt an attempt to change anyones mind about what they believe in, or argue the christian viewpoint, it's just an expression of some opinions, and a simple question.