I have never been confronted with even one fact of evolution which wasn't also a fact of intelligent design.
Huh??? Then you haven't been looking very hard. One of the most important forces in evolution is
random mutation, caused by such everyday events as cosmic rays and climate shifts. The vast majority are either deleterious or have no impact at all, but on rare occasions one confers a survival advantage. At this point the organism with the advantage is still at the mercy of random events (which I suppose you would romantically rename "fate") and the odds of the mutation being passed down to future generations are often not very great.
It took a hundred thousand generations during an ice age for a population of grizzly bears to mutate into polar bears, due to the survival advantage of white fur against a snowy background, and of a greater mass of fat for improved buoyancy in an aquatic environment. A simple change in the shape of their teeth, making it incrementally easier to catch aquatic prey, took ten thousand years.
If this is, indeed, "design," then it is not very "intelligent."
Intelligent design is what humans do when we breed new varieties of the plants we eat (or use for decoration) and the animals we eat (or use for draft or simply companionship. We have created new varieties of dogs, horses, cattle, sheep, chickens and myriad other animals in just a few generations, often within a single human lifetime. If the gods are trying to do the same thing, with their vastly superior powers, then why do they work so much more slowly than we do???
The theory of evolution comes down to a leap of faith(an extrapolation) based on a preconditioned worldview.
What??? The theory of evolution is based on a mountain of evidence from two different, unrelated sciences: paleontology and genetics. It is one of the most solid, irrefutable theories in the entire canon of science!
Anyone who doubts it has automatically identified himself as antiscience.
This is quite handy, since we instantly know to be skeptical of anything he may say in the future.
The actual facts present in this extrapolated theory only serve to strengthen your personal underlying naturalistic belief system, not the theory itself. Given identical supporting facts, understand that your bias worldview is most likely responsible for you choosing one theory over the other.
Yatta yatta. Do you have any idea how foolish your preposterous arguments are??? How badly you are embarrassing yourself??? You know virtually NOTHING about science!