Matt D Skeptic
Registered Senior Member
Well, I wake every morning and see faces in my curtains without the need for Carlotto and McDaniels supercomputer. What I cannot fathom is why everyone gets so excited when lines connecting 3 humps form a triangle then SELECTIVELY connecting them to 3 other blips in the landscape finding another set of triangles - gosh, that is just about as much proof as an alien craft landing in New York and the inhabitants giving us all a big kiss.
Before this gets deleted by Dave - who I must admit is doing a damn fine jobs of things and this site is a vast improvement......BUT and this a big BUT (enough grovelling-where is Warpspace these days??)
These computer specilists are CONVINCED the moon landings were faked and that NASA duped them, but then they use NASA material to "PROVE" extraterrestrial existence on Mars and even use NASA images to submit that structures are on the moon. I mean come on guys, you cannot have it both way. This is very selective. "We believe THESE photos to be true, but THOSE must be faked?" Which is it to be?
What has happened to the "tear" on the cheek of the face since the recent photos of Mars were taken? And the headpiece?
Everyone knows Martians are subterranean and dissolve in sunlight, so why would they build on the surface?
What is it to be? Faked photos or not? If NASA made one lot up, then why not the others? You cannot say we believe these but not those. Richard Hoagland is prime candidate for this. Close 2nd is David Percy. Graham Hancock you are a naughty boy and need some spanking too. Someone somewhere is havin' a larf-innit. Best Wishes, MDS.
------------------
You know it to be so
Before this gets deleted by Dave - who I must admit is doing a damn fine jobs of things and this site is a vast improvement......BUT and this a big BUT (enough grovelling-where is Warpspace these days??)
These computer specilists are CONVINCED the moon landings were faked and that NASA duped them, but then they use NASA material to "PROVE" extraterrestrial existence on Mars and even use NASA images to submit that structures are on the moon. I mean come on guys, you cannot have it both way. This is very selective. "We believe THESE photos to be true, but THOSE must be faked?" Which is it to be?
What has happened to the "tear" on the cheek of the face since the recent photos of Mars were taken? And the headpiece?
Everyone knows Martians are subterranean and dissolve in sunlight, so why would they build on the surface?
What is it to be? Faked photos or not? If NASA made one lot up, then why not the others? You cannot say we believe these but not those. Richard Hoagland is prime candidate for this. Close 2nd is David Percy. Graham Hancock you are a naughty boy and need some spanking too. Someone somewhere is havin' a larf-innit. Best Wishes, MDS.
------------------
You know it to be so