So according to this, the Catholic Church has axed 26 priests, and is undergoing some sort of "housecleaning". It seems to me that the Catholic bureaucracy might have a big backlog of evidence concerning child abuse by it's own membership. By and large, however effective their internal purge, they are NOT turning the evidence over to police or prosecutors: they are just letting them go as quietly as they can. And they are picking and choosing what information they release.Other Dioceses Open Up About Abuse
Wed Mar 6, 2:35 PM ET
By RACHEL ZOLL, AP Religion Writer
Pressure from the pedophilia scandal in the Archdiocese of Boston has led to an unprecedented openness among American bishops about abuse allegations in their own dioceses.
While many key details remain secret — and critics say much more information should be released — rank-and-file Roman Catholics have been learning more than ever about sexual molestation by clergy. (full text here).
So, can someone please explain to me their moral justification for withholding evidence of criminal activity from the authorities. I can see the public relations reasons for doing it, and even the legal ones (they don't want to acknowledge any more liability than is pried out of them). But surely this issue must have been discussed at a pretty high level within the church, and being the moralizing types they are, I would think they've come up with some kind of justification for it. What could it be? What comforting (if not comfortable) moral blanket have they cast over themselves?
Peace.