Can it be construed as cruel if the world powers stopped giving food aid to third world countries.
It plays out like this. when you have a population 1 billion starving, you need to create food for 1 billion. When those 1 billion, or most of them anyway, have food, they live longer, and in most cases, reproduce, adding to the 7 billion already here.
The next generation could have 7.5 billion or even 8.
this just leaves us even more fucked than we were when 1 billion people were starving in a world of 7 billion. We now have too feed 2 billion starving.
Its the new "it" thing these days to be near overly concerned for the state of the earth. All the hottest celebrities are doing it, movies about iit are winning awards and yet the problem of feeding the hungry goes largely ignored.
Even with the advancement in technology, there is a threshold of people Earth was not meant to contain.
So again, is it cruel to deny the hungry food in hope for a better tomorrow?
It plays out like this. when you have a population 1 billion starving, you need to create food for 1 billion. When those 1 billion, or most of them anyway, have food, they live longer, and in most cases, reproduce, adding to the 7 billion already here.
The next generation could have 7.5 billion or even 8.
this just leaves us even more fucked than we were when 1 billion people were starving in a world of 7 billion. We now have too feed 2 billion starving.
Its the new "it" thing these days to be near overly concerned for the state of the earth. All the hottest celebrities are doing it, movies about iit are winning awards and yet the problem of feeding the hungry goes largely ignored.
Even with the advancement in technology, there is a threshold of people Earth was not meant to contain.
So again, is it cruel to deny the hungry food in hope for a better tomorrow?