Electrodynamic Spin Gravity

Followed the link.

Instead of just saying that Zarkov is a total crank and just leaving it at that (even though that is all that the site deserves), I thought I would at least disect the first introductory paragraph.

The gravitational field of the Earth changes from location to location and from moment to moment.
Click to expand...

Says who?

This moment to moment variation in the observed force of gravity is difficult to explain if the force of gravity was due to some direct property of mass.
Click to expand...

Except when that variation is not observed.

The properties that are observed have an electrodynamic nature.
Click to expand...

And finally, what?
 
Thanks, Pete, yes I am working into this area, The Solar System is so accurately intergrated, I expect there is much more to learn of these interconnections.

I need a set of perihelion advances for all the planets.. just raw data as observed, not conjectured and disected.

I can't find any data!!

:)

Scotth,
Gravity maps are interesting things, what I wrote is observed by some workers in the field. But you should get into the maths and the results of the calculations and the ease that these accurate results fall out of the equations compared with observed values, .... theory is only meant to give you a fantasy to explain the situation. The observed situation does not change because of arm waving theory.

:)
 
Originally posted by Zarkov
Thanks, Pete, yes I am working into this area, The Solar System is so accurately intergrated, I expect there is much more to learn of these interconnections.

I need a set of perihelion advances for all the planets.. just raw data as observed, not conjectured and disected.

I can't find any data!!

:)

Scotth,
Gravity maps are interesting things, what I wrote is observed by some workers in the field. But you should get into the maths and the results of the calculations and the ease that these accurate results fall out of the equations compared with observed values, .... theory is only meant to give you a fantasy to explain the situation. The observed situation does not change because of arm waving theory.

:)
Click to expand...

Your major problem is that in the realm of the observable effects of gravity, things are well and completely explained by current theories.

If you can correctly compute the orbit of Mercury using your theory, let me know.

Theories are predictive. If you can't use them to work out how events can/will happen, they aren't very useful. I see alot of fluffy words and very little concrete mathematical underpinnings.

This thing is a total waste of time.

I see you have observed a 2^n=v^2 relationship to the planet orbital velocity. Pretty nice too. Almost accurate to 1 digit of precision.

This is not a theory.
 
>> I see you have observed a 2^n=v^2 relationship to the planet orbital velocity. Pretty nice too. Almost accurate to 1 digit of precision.


All one could expect if a fission mechanism is at work to produce the planets and moons.....
 
Now thats not every professional Crispix

The reason god gave us a butt and a mouth was to discern which
one we were to speak with, but we all realize that you have no special inerest in science, no proof of mathematics in electrodynamics and little understanding not to eat $hit and talk out of your a$$...
 
Oh dear, I will have to put out the banner "children playing".


So I take it you are all SR and GR guys ?

:)
 
Well, the people who do know something about SR and GR are the ones actually protesting Kirk's claims.


Kirk,

Very nice you read through it. For your information, I do have an interest in science (as it is my work), I do know all the proofs of electrodynamics, and I generally consider myself not to talk out of my ass more than once every 10 minutes.

The reason why you are not being taken seriously (by me and about every other educated member of this board) is:
- your complete incapability to communicate your ideas to the world. The words you use do not mean anything in the way you use them. The formulas you use have absolutely no meaning without you stating what all the constants do.
- your complete incapability to reply properly when people ask for what you mean by your incoherent babbling. Especially when your replies contradict your original postings, or contain even more mistakes and abuse of words.
- your claims of what we all should study before we can actually understand what you are saying. Even though some, if not most, of us have actually studied what you refered to and hence see that what you are saying has absolutely no meaning.

So, my personal suggestion is that you either take your technobabble, leave and thus stop filling this forum with nonsense (that would be greatly appreciated), or get your grip together and actually do a little effort to explain what the hell you are doing here. Oh, and we don't have mercy with crackpots either.

Bye!

Crisp
 
dstr = pi (ex_ir + wy_jr + sz_kr + Gt_lr)_vac*c+v/m

This shows space is active through an extention of dimensional
space in layers through chromodynamics and electrodynamics as
layers of manifold fields through monopole interaction eminating
gravity and inertia as bi-production of radiation exchanges or
bosonic-fermion dynamics.

The quarternions (i+j+k+l) are propagations of quarks (r_s) from c+v.
c is light
v is velocity

The entire formula is a basis for the casimir effect on the four force of nature in a vacuum on mass/energy links or matter dynamics. The results of this process are to enhance field
strength of subatomic energy to increase the casimir effect
exchange or casimir dynamics to tap energy as a resource
through electric fields by inertia induction or singularity
attraction of string gravity or inertia inversion which is not shown.
 
Last edited:
Re: dstr = pi (exr + wyr + szr + Gtr)_vac*c+v/m

Originally posted by Kirk Gaulden
Meaningless Drivel Snipped
Click to expand...

This shows nothing whatsoever. Do you even know what a Lie group is?
 
Last edited:
Re: yes I do!

Originally posted by Kirk Gaulden
This is not dribble or meanless, in this equation your taking
you're activating light plus velocity of propagation to produce flux from the vacuum inside of quarks to reproduce virtual particles.
Click to expand...

The URL you post has nothing to do with QCD, less to do with QED and nothing to do with whatever it was you posted. This reads like some one taking random words out of the Physics scrabble bag and arranging a sentence with them. More evidence found at http://tinyurl.com/lzml
 
Electromagnetic Spin Gravity Prediction

The size of the planet given it's mass can be predicted or the density easly determined because the size of the body is expanded until it's surface magnetic field density is equal to the predetermined magnetic field density value of the immersion field. The measure of the imersion field pressure can be obtained using this observation, by comparing the actual radius with the theoretical radius.

So a quantity of geomagnetic mass will expand until the magnetic field density on it's surface is in balance with the intergalactic magnetic field density that the mass is immersed in. For our Solar System distance from the galactic centre, the intergalactic magnetic field density value is between 1.76 X10^-7 and 15.4 X10^-7 field units / km^2.

:)
 
Re: Electromagnetic Spin Gravity Prediction

Originally posted by Zarkov
The size of the planet given it's mass can be predicted
Click to expand...

Wow, you've worked out the holy grail of planetary geology.

or the density easly determined
Click to expand...

Divide mass by volume? Except it is not that easy.

because the size of the body is expanded
Click to expand...

What do you mean by that? If you expand the size, or volume, the density goes down. But you just said that was wasy to work out.

until it's surface magnetic field density is equal to the predetermined magnetic field density value of the immersion field.
Click to expand...

What is an immersion field? Something you are immersed in?

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=immerse

How is this related to a magnetic field? Electromagnetic immersion theory is a new one on me.

The measure of the imersion field pressure can be obtained using this observation
Click to expand...

Observation of what exactly? The magnetic field pressure, density of the expanded body, but what expands it, maybe it's mass or size. What exactly.

, by comparing the actual radius with the theoretical radius.
Click to expand...

What are the diferences between actual and theoretical. What is your model for 'theoretical radius', how does this differ from actual. I am not aware of a comoving radius for a planets radius.

So a quantity of geomagnetic mass
Click to expand...

What is geomagnetic mass? Not all mass is magnetic you now. I've yet to see a magnetic sandstone, chalk, obsidian, chert ...

will expand until the magnetic field density on it's surface is in balance with the intergalactic magnetic field density
Click to expand...

Intergalactic eh? That explains why all our planets are different sizes I suppose. And the 100 or so extrasolar planets are different sizes. You evidence to support this point of view is?

that the mass is immersed in.
Click to expand...

An immersion field, I suppose?

For our Solar System distance from the galactic centre, the intergalactic magnetic field density value is between 1.76 X10^-7 and 15.4 X10^-7 field units / km^2.
Click to expand...

That well known SI unit, the field unit. Well that settles it. Zarkov has cocked his snoop at all those pesky scientists.

:)
Click to expand...

Notes ascinine smile.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top