E=mc2 questions?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Do you not understand that weight does not exist in an existence on its own merits?
But mass does. Mass and weight are not the same thing. Weight is the measure of the effect of gravity on mass. It is not mass, but is a product of mass and gravity.
 
mass is the weight that is what you use in the maths
Mass isn't weight, so your sentence is meaningless.

the definition even tells you , you are the one who is lying and denying definitions and use.
And yet you can't provide a link to this "definition" while simultaneously ignoring the definitions that we've linked to.

Weight is the resistance to force
No it's not.

mass is the resistance force
Correct.

they are the same thing and you deny the maths and all
Since the maths uses MASS and not weight you're wrong.

please give the mass for the 2cm3 object?
Not possible, since you haven't specified a density.

You know the answer is a weight so stop lying.
Only on Earth.
Not any where else (unless that place also has a 1G gravity).
 
But mass does. Mass and weight are not the same thing. Weight is the measure of the effect of gravity on mass. It is not mass, but is a product of mass and gravity.
I know weight is not really a thing, that is what I just said, come on I am waiting give the mass for a 2cm3 cube, you know the answer is a weight and I am correct, so why continue trying to lie, when I proven it already?
 
Newtons is the term for weight and kilogram is the term for mass. In everyday terms however we use kilogram for weight just because that has been the common usage. Perhaps this is what is causing your confusion?

It's like referring to how bright a light bulb is in watts. Everyone "knows" how bright a 100 watt light bulb is but actually "watt" tells us nothing about how bright the light is. It's a measure of how much power it consumes.

We should be using lumens for output. It became comon usage (watts) only because light bulb technology didn't change for so long that it was assumed that the bulb being referred to was incandescent and everyone knew from past experience about how bright that bulb was but watts has nothing to do with brightness.

It's similar to the way kilogram is misused for weight in common usage.
 
because you know it shows you lie! and that is why you will not answer.
Is that why you haven't provided the link I've asked for?
Because you know you're lying.

And you're wrong.
Unless you specify the density of the object then I can't tell you the mass. (Nor the weight).
Regardless, mass and weight are NOT the same thing.
 
Newtons is the term for weight and kilogram is the term for mass. In everyday terms however we use kilogram for weight just because that has been the common usage. Perhaps this is what is causing your confusion?

It's like referring to how bright a light bulb is in watts. Everyone "knows" how bright a 100 watt light bulb is but actually "watt" tells us nothing about how bright the light is. It's a measure of how much power it consumes.

We should be using lumens for output. It became comon usage (watts) only because light bulb technology didn't change for so long that it was assumed that the bulb being referred to was incandescent and everyone knew from past experience about how bright that bulb was but watts has nothing to do with brightness.

It's similar to the way kilogram is misused for weight in common usage.
0.981n is = 100g it is the same thing painted a different colour
 
Is that why you haven't provided the link I've asked for?
Because you know you're lying.

And you're wrong.
Unless you specify the density of the object then I can't tell you the mass. (Nor the weight).
Regardless, mass and a weight are NOT the same thing.
strange how 0.981n =100g and 100g = 0.981n if that is not the same then wow.
 
If I set up a paypal account, will anyone give me long odds that TC will never understand or admit to what he's being told?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top