The energies join, there is nothing to oppose the energies becoming one, and it really does matter when you consider the invisible constant and what we observe.
E=mc2 questions?
- Thread starter theorist-constant12345
- Start date
- Status
Seattle
Valued Senior Member
You are going overboard with the concept of a "constant". Light has a constant maximum speed and that's about it.
"Invisible constant" doesn't even make sense.
Of course!
Again you are totally in the dark, or in a scenario with no EMS.
And you really seem to revel in this ignorance you so expertly portray.
Is this why you suffered total permanent bannings elsewhere?
Look at your wall, the 3 dimensional space between your eyes and wall is empty space <except air>, and also full of light passing through that space, you can not see this light, it is not of spectral colours or visible to your eye, it is invisible, if you notice it is also unchanging, a constant , a constant speed and a constant of invisible to sight, do you understand that?
Well correct that I'm not really that smart, but I am just smart enough to recognise frauds, buffoons and Idiots when I am confronted by them.
Seattle
Valued Senior Member
Look at the Sun, it is not invisible. It has a varying color temp depending on position in the sky. You don't notice light until it hits something if you aren't looking at the source and then what you see has to do with absorption and reflection.
The max speed is a constant. "Constant of invisible to sight" is nonsense wording.
You are overusing "3 dimensional space" for some reason as well. It also makes no sense to refer to 3 dimensional space as empty except for air.
If you want to see a beam of light using a green laser at night or indoor even during the day under certain conditions if there are enough particles in the air.
Real physics is much more interesting that pseudo-physics babble. Why not learn that?
Why not learn, I know what science says light is, you mean why i do not accept it and move on? because it is wrong plain and simple.
The invisible constant is not nonsense wording, that is what it is an invisible constant unless you are now claiming you can see the mixture of frequencies in 3 dimensional space that you claim is there, 3 dimensional space is what it is called so I do not misuse the word.
It is not me who does not understand light and its behaviour.
It started at room temperature.
So you agree that your "theory" predicts that gravity makes the water cold, right?
The water is already at its loss to gravity that is the point you are not getting.
In another words move the gravity and it would heat quicker maybe...
Yeah that would explain why, for example, mountain tops (with less gravity) never get snow.
Oh, wait ...
Seattle
Valued Senior Member
What mixture of frequencies? I thought you believe there to be no misture.
If maybe enough complained about the Idiot within, and his crank ideas, his trolling, his many contradictions and his lying, someone may put a stop to it.
While I believe nuts and their crank claims need to be refuted, perhaps in this case you are right.
Even children [shown by my grandson earlier] are laughing at his lame brained brand of pseudo nonsense, so refutation in this case probably is not necessary, as obviously stupidity and Idiocy are ruling the claims.
Considering all that, I may let him now grovel in his ignorance.
Last edited:
Me - "Double negative, your honor? However, you are incorrect - I have demonstrated that 3 lasers do not make a single frequency out of the 3 beams; instead they make a mixture of frequencies that we perceive as white light. You can see the white light that results right there. I have also shown that what we see as white light is made up of a range of frequencies."
In other words, gravity makes the water cold, right?
No, energy loss greater than energy gain makes the water cold. Energy gain greater than energy loss makes the water warmer. The energy loss to gravity is un-noticed by the water, to the water it is natural and already accounted for by thermodynamic gain.
1 Kg of water is always subject to the loss of 9.81n in the equivalent of energy.
Last edited:
So the water loses energy to gravity but at the same time gains exactly the same amount via "thermodynamic gain"? Ok: What is the "thermodynamic gain"? Where does that energy come from?
It comes from the atmosphere, EM radiation, you if you are presence, In my opinion all matter has a sponge like property and can absorb energy or lose energy.
Gravity is a constant force applied, so any object subjective to gravity is always at a loss of its equilibrium to gravity . Gravity is + and minus of energy of mass being attracted to other + and minus of energy of mass. The plus and minus seemingly acting has one force which is gravity. Energy is the only mechanism in any mass that has the force of attraction and repelling, so therefore gravity must be seen has the acting of energies because mass has no other mechanism except energy.
It may surprise you but i am going to explain force, and there is only in my opinion two things associated with force, one being gravity and the second being opposed to gravity, and this is the collective of forces narrowed down to the roots.
P.s Up and down do not exist, only contraction or expanding from the center of mass.
P.s at altitude does water need less energy added to boil?
The Caesium atom ticks faster at altitude because the energy loss to gravity is decreased by distance away from gravity as gravity decreases the clock speeds up because the restriction is removed.
Hopefully by now you can see that it is your science, and I am just re-aligning some aspects and coming up with answers
If you were a Caesium atom and made a Journey to the Sun from the Earth , consider what the effect on the beating of the atom would be, It would firstly speed up in its beats and then has you approached the Sun it would slow back down again , to a slower rate than earth because there is more gravity in the sun, showing you the restriction gravity has on matter.
GPS time delay is a carrier signal entering a medium from a vacuum and in effect slowing down by the refraction of the medium causing a delay and change in velocity from the vacuum speed. The vacuum has no mechanism to propagate an EM wave, where as the medium has an opposing force and resistance to the EM radiation flow
A Neutron star still has gravity because it is either a plus or a minus, and with atoms and matter being of both plus and minus, there is still an attractive force of energy of the mass, so the atoms can be attracted and crushed.
P.s I use the term energy in a broad range because I know science knows the atomic forces etc better than myself.
Last edited:
No, it can't come from the atmosphere or EM radiation if there is no temperature difference. Guess again. You are making this up as you go, aren't you?
Making it up, how in relationship of the caesium atom and gravity, the energy difference made up?
How is an electron attracted to a proton made up?
How is entropy means made up?
The water always retains it's equilibrium to the environment, add more energy to the atmosphere and the water warms up by thermodynamic gain,
take away energy from the environment and the water will lose energy to the environment, hence frost on the ground, the water is not equal to its equilibrium of liquid state.
The water is always at an equilibrium to gravity, always under a constant loss.
It is not made up it is entropy of any mass.
- Status