E=mc2 questions?

[Seattle]

To put it bluntly , a cheap parlour trick that means absolutely nothing.
I believe it is the angle having a distance and time displacement effect on the light, and the angle simply stretches the light to is propagation wavelength.

Do you consider the same effect in the form of a rainbow to be a cheap parlour trick or the same effect when light passes though a glass of water?

Do you understand the concept of a diffractive index for the various wave lengths present in the colors of the rainbow (the color spectrum)?

 

[theorist-constant12345]

Do you consider the same effect in the form of a rainbow to be a cheap parlour trick or the same effect when light passes though a glass of water?

Do you understand the concept of a diffractive index for the various wave lengths present in the colors of the rainbow (the color spectrum)?

Yes i know how the refraction/diffraction index works, I understand rainbows, and you will see if you look proper, that a raindrop the same has the prism uses the shorter distance to the source for the higher frequency always, because of the less distance by angle there is more force creating more propagation respectively to wavelength, what you see is UV so stretched by the speed it is see through, and if you slow it it down you then see lower frequencies of one and the same being equal to a black body that is stretched. Propagate light to a maximum and we have black.
I understand this may sound insane but that is what I observe with a prism has my diagram illustrates in detail if you consider angular distance and force.

 

[paddoboy]

I stated that dark is not just not the absence of light and is deeper than that,

What is black then?

Try and learn what even children accept. It has been shown and prooved and accepted over a couple of hundreds of years that Dark is just the absence of EMR. EMR has to be produced which logically means it is a "thing".
Dark does not need to be produced. It is simply the absence of the whole spectrum of EMR.
Let's see how many scientifically sounding words you are able to string together, to try and logically deny that.

I have said this before, but let me say it again.
The silliest, craziest thing about what you claim, besides absolutely no evidence to support it, is the inference that the whole world is wrong, and you somehow are our saviour.
That is really and totally sad.

 

[Dywyddyr]

Yes i know how the refraction/diffraction index works, I understand rainbows, and you will see if you look proper, that a raindrop the same has the prism uses the shorter distance to the source for the higher frequency always, because of the less distance by angle there is more force creating more propagation respectively to wavelength, what you see is UV so stretched by the speed it is see through, and if you slow it it down you then see lower frequencies of one and the same being equal to a black body that is stretched. Propagate light to a maximum and we have black.
I understand this may sound insane but that is what I observe with a prism has my diagram illustrates in detail if you consider angular distance and force.

In other words you DON'T know how refraction/ diffraction works and you DON'T understand rainbows.
You just make shit up and hope we'll believe you.

Plus, of course, your "explanation" here goes against your previous denials that white light consists of the full spectrum.

 

[theorist-constant12345]

What is black then?

Try and learn what even children accept. It has been shown and prooved and accepted over a couple of hundreds of years that Dark is just the absence of EMR. EMR has to be produced which logically means it is a "thing".
Dark does not need to be produced. It is simply the absence of the whole spectrum of EMR.
Let's see how many scientifically sounding words you are able to string together, to try and logically deny that.

I have said this before, but let me say it again.
The silliest, craziest thing about what you claim, besides absolutely no evidence to support it, is the inference that the whole world is wrong, and you somehow are our saviour.
That is really and totally sad.

Black is the maximum propagation of light, this can be seen in clouds when the density at the bottom of the cloud is at its greatest the light propagates the most, light is black, from a black body, but black stretched out at c becomes see through. When it slows it starts to return to black dependant on propagation and refractive indexes.

 

[paddoboy]

Propagate light to a maximum and we have black.
I understand this may sound insane but that is what I observe with a prism has my diagram illustrates in detail if you consider angular distance and force.

It is insane. Do you realise that black is not a colour per se?
Black is just the absence of colour.
Again all you have done is string together a few scientifically sounding words to come up with an incoherent sentence.

 

[Dywyddyr]

Meaningless bullshit.
(theorist-crackpot's post, not paddo's).

 

[theorist-constant12345]

In other words you DON'T know how refraction/ diffraction works and you DON'T understand rainbows.
You just make shit up and hope we'll believe you.

Plus, of course, your "explanation" here goes against your previous denials that white light consists of the full spectrum.

It does not go against what I said about white light, I have give mechanism to the process and how it works by force over distance incurring different propagation before the white light enters the prism, I give a mechanism you could not.

 

[paddoboy]

No axiom evidence, you are barking mad, you are trying to deny that light in 3 dimensional space is see through to all observers? that is an axiom of logic that can not be denied, you lie not me and think you are in some way funny in the process.

Hey sonny. The forum is laughing at you, not me!

 

[theorist-constant12345]

It is insane. Do you realise that black is not a colour per se?
Black is just the absence of colour.
Again all you have done is string together a few scientifically sounding words to come up with an incoherent sentence.

Black is the maximum propagation of light, look at the clouds this confirms this, light slows down in a medium , almost to a stop in a cloud.

 

[Dywyddyr]

It does not go against what I said about white light

Yes it does.

I have give mechanism tot he process and how it works by force over distance

What "force"?

incurring different propagation before the white light enters the prism

Crap.
The light splits AS it enters the prism, not before.

I give a mechanism you could not.

No, you made up a load of meaningless bollocks - that's not a mechanism it's unsupported and insupportable bullshit.

Black is the maximum propagation of light

light slows down in a medium

No it doesn't.

 

[paddoboy]

Black is the maximum propagation of light, this can be seen in clouds when the density at the bottom of the cloud is at its greatest the light propagates the most, light is black, from a black body, but black stretched out at c becomes see through. When it slows it starts to return to black dependant on propagation and refractive indexes.

Total unmitigated crap...More stringing together of scientifically sounding words. NO CLOUD IN ANY CIRCUMSTANCES IS TOTALLY BLACK: SHADES OF GREY MAYBE.
https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=what is black
black
blak/
adjective

1. 
   
   
   • 1.
     of the very darkest color owing to the absence of or complete absorption of light; the opposite of white.

 

[paddoboy]

It does not go against what I said about white light,

Everything you have said actually goes against all scientific logic and sensibility.

I have give mechanism to the process and how it works by force over distance incurring different propagation before the white light enters the prism, I give a mechanism you could not.

You have given nothing except an insight into how delusional your mind is.

 

[theorist-constant12345]

Yes it does.

What "force"?


Crap.
The light splits AS it enters the prism, not before.


No, you made up a load of meaningless bollocks - that's not a mechanism it's unsupported and insupportable bullshit.




No it doesn't.

For something to propagate in a medium the medium is the opposing force to a force. EM radiation has a very weak force, without a force there would be no propagation, because there would be nothing to recoil to make propagation, this can be clearly seen in the Doppler redshift and blueshift, an object travelling into the light opposes more force by oncoming into the force of the light causes a greater propagation of light, hence a tighter wave and blue.
Where as an object travelling away from the light is releasing the chasing force, hence a longer stretched wave and red shift.

Em radiation has a physical presence in the form of energy, energy is the presence.

 

[theorist-constant12345]

Everything you have said actually goes against all scientific logic and sensibility.


You have given nothing except an insight into how delusional your mind is.

I am telling you I believe me because of the Physics.

 

[Dywyddyr]

For something to propagate in a medium the medium is the opposing force to a force.

What "force"?

EM radiation has a very weak force, without a force there would be no propagation, because there would be nothing to recoil to make propagation

Nothing DOES recoil.
Propagation isn't recoil.

this can be clearly seen in the Doppler redshift and blueshift, an object travelling into the light opposes more force by oncoming into the force of the light causes a greater propagation of light, hence a tighter wave and blue.

Meaningless crap.

Where as an object travelling away from the light is releasing the chasing force, hence a longer stretched wave and red shift.

Meaningless crap.

Em radiation has a physical presence in the form of energy, energy is the presence.

Oh wait, I thought you'd claimed that "light is an illusion"?

I am telling you I believe me because of the Physics.

You don't know physics.

 

[paddoboy]

I am telling you I believe me because of the Physics.

What you believe is neither here nor there. Delusional people around the world all believe in different forms of some deity. They are all not correct. You are not correct. You obviously are delusional.You defy physics, you defy reality, you defy logic, and most pertinent, you defy science.

 

[Russ_Watters]

It was a question, not a statement. But to answer yours: a vacuum insulated thermos.

A month.

The tap.

TC: please respond.

 

[paddoboy]

The following is a dumbed down link directed at children. Whether or not it is beyond theorist constant remains to be seen......

http://www.sciencekids.co.nz/sciencefacts/light.html

 

[theorist-constant12345]

What "force"?


Nothing DOES recoil.
Propagation isn't recoil.


Meaningless crap.


Meaningless crap.


Oh wait, I thought you'd claimed that "light is an illusion"?


You don't know physics.

The force of energy itself, propagation is recoil that is why the waves compress or decompress by the recoil or uncoiling by force, that is how the spectrum works by speed of interchange, light is an illusion but EM radiation is not, EM radiation has a force, it may be massless but it has a force and a Physical presence being energy.
The force is very weak, like a slight ripple of wind that could hardly blow a leaf.