weight - a body's relative mass or the quantity of matter contained by it, giving rise to a downward force; the heaviness of a person or thing.
The same thing.
The same thing.
E=mc2 questions?
- Thread starter theorist-constant12345
- Start date
- Status
Please support this contention.
It weighs less. It does not MASS less.
This has been explained to you.
You have been given links.
This too has been explained to you.
No it's not what I've been saying.
Stop inventing arguments that I haven't made.
Wrong.
Any mass in free fall is weightless.
Wrong.
See previous explanations and links.
Since weight isn't a constant then you're wrong on this also.
try google definitions
This is what you are saying in science - You are saying if i take a 100g cube from earth and do the equation E=mc2 for the cube.
I then take the cube to the moon, where has it as less mass by your own definitions that I have provided the quote from
''In physics, mass is a property of a physical body which determines resistance to being accelerated by a force and the strength of its mutual gravitational attraction with other bodies''
weight
weɪt/
noun
- 1.
a body's relative mass or the quantity of matter contained by it, giving rise to a downward force; the heaviness of a person or thing.
So if i take my cube to the moon and weigh it, it no longer weighs 100g , it will weight a lot less depending on gravity strength.
So then with my new mass weight, of example 10g, and then i do E=mc2, according to science my cube loses 90% of its energy potential?
if you were smart, you would now be considering time dilation and how that works and making the connection.
This is not science! You ask questions with no intent on accepting any answer.
Seattle
Valued Senior Member
If you were smart this thread wouldn't exist.
So now you argue that your own definitions are wrong how ironic. It says it there in black and white, that weight is an objects relative mass, relative to gravity magnitude,
try putting a Caesium atom on the moon, and watch the proof unfold showing gravity and energy displacement relationship.
This is your science, I am asking questions, and you keep bending the truth, mass is weight that is how we do the maths so stop lying.
LEARN TO READ>
It will have EXACTLY the same mass.
Mass is not weight.
It will WEIGH less, it will MASS the same.
"Mass weight" is a meaningless term you've just made up.
It will have the same mass - as I have said all along. And as science says.
Therefore science will NOT say the "cube loses 90% of its energy potential".
Science works on MASS which is invariant.
That is WHY Einstein used MASS and not WEIGHT.
exchemist
Valued Senior Member
No, it is you that is mistakenly introducing weight into the discussion. Weight has nothing to do with it, as shown in my my previous post, which makes no reference at all to weight.
Asking questions and giving polar opposite views to engage in heavy defence is a smart way to get answers........
No , it's your definition. Everybody else is telling you that weight and mass are different things. You really are totally ignorant of the basics of science.
And your typical straw man argument.
You are deluded we all can see it says it there in black and white it says noun - weight is an objects relative mass, stop lying when its there infront of you.
Please link to the page that states this.
Otherwise you're lying.
Bollocks.
You're lying again.
Provide a link to where it states that.
- Status