Does space bend In a pure vacuum ?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Disagree pad .
Disagree all you like. No skin off my nose or anyone else's. That's still the fundamental model overwhelmingly supported, based on experimental and observational evidence and data, and your disagreement or otherwise, holds no bearing. The Moon rotates on its axis....it didn't stop rotating because you disagreed with it.:rolleyes:
.
 
Disagree all you like. No skin off my nose or anyone else's. That's still the fundamental model overwhelmingly supported, based on experimental and observational evidence and data, and your disagreement or otherwise, holds no bearing. The Moon rotates on its axis....it didn't stop rotating because you disagreed with it.:rolleyes:
.

The evidence is clear .
 
Post#439 ;

So for spacetime to " bend " you need matter .

Please go back and read all answers given to you, and you'll see that all the same answers have been given to you, summed up admirably with the John Archibald Wheeler quote...."Matter/energy tells spacetime how to curve: Spacetime tells matter/energy how to move" .

Without the presence of matter spacetime will not bend .
 
Post#439 ;





Without the presence of matter spacetime will not bend .
???That's what " "Matter/energy tells spacetime how to curve: Spacetime tells matter/energy how to move" .means river.
I think you are again, both lying and/or trolling.
You know, the two qualities I correctly labeled you with before, and what you reported me for.
 
That's what " "Matter/energy tells spacetime how to curve: Spacetime tells matter/energy how to move" .means river.
I think you are again, both lying and/or trolling.
You know, the two qualities I correctly labeled you with before, and what you reported me for.

Then spacetime has physical properties .

What are these physical properties ?
 
Last edited:
Then spacetime has physical properties .
What do you mean by properties river?
Spacetime is a multi-dimensional framework against which we locate events and it follows from the observation that the speed of light is invariant, and it does not vary with the motion of the emitter or the observer. Spacetime allows a description of reality that is common for all observers in the universe.
What are these properties ?
What do you mean by properties river?
I've given you a proper definition.
 
river said:
Nope , I'm not going to tell you what I mean . I don't need to ; for any reason .


Of course you're not.You can't. And no, you don't need to, for any reason, because you are trolling and lying to your delusional self.

But I will ask you a question though , in my thread , how does spacetime become effected by matter .
 
But I will ask you a question though , in my thread , how does spacetime become effected by matter .
Unlike your trolling,lying and gutless behaviour river, I'll answer that...we don't know why spacetime is affected by matter/energy. How it is affected, you have been told many many times...in curving, in lensing, in warping, in twisting, and even in gravitational waves....all by the way validated by observational evidence and other data.
 
Unlike your trolling,lying and gutless behaviour river, I'll answer that...we don't know why spacetime is affected by matter/energy. How it is affected, you have been told many many times...in curving, in lensing, in warping, in twisting, and even in gravitational waves....all by the way validated by observational evidence and other data.

Highlighted

That is a problem for spacetime advocates .

Therefore spacetime , until proven , physically , holds no grounds in any theory .
 
Highlighted

That is a problem for spacetime advocates .
Spacetime advocates as you put it, already know that, and they also know that the BB also has limitations, but both are way superior in observational and predictive data then anything you have yet dreamed up.
A shame though you are still unable to answer your own shortcomings as honestly as science does.
Therefore spacetime , until proven , physically , holds no grounds in any theory .
Go check out the cosmological and science journals next week river, and they will still hold as overwhelmingly supported both observationally and experimentally.
And may I say again, another " tribute" to your childish trolling and lying.
 
Spacetime advocates as you put it, already know that, and they also know that the BB also has limitations, but both are way superior in observational and predictive data then anything you have yet dreamed up.
A shame though you are still unable to answer your own shortcomings as honestly as science does.

My logic is slowly , making you think , pad .
 
My logic is slowly , making you think , pad .
Not at all....you are totally wrong and lack all knowledge, but worst of all, refuse to learn and simply troll and lie when backed into a corner with links.
Ah the bully .
I don't bully trolls river. In essence you have my sympathy, not for your trolling, but your now painfully obvious psychotic disorder.
Let's hope you don't suffer further banning.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top