Does Democracy ever not degenerate from its conservative morality?

If this were the case, the world would have been in a truly woeful condition throughout almost all history! There have undoubtedly been times, often revolutionary times, when nations were energised and "got it together"; and other times when things fell apart.

Let me tell you a story. Many years ago, a relative who served with the British occupation forces after WWII reported on a conversation with an old German who had lived through both world wars. The German was no apologist for Hitler, for the Fuhrer had brought about the ruin of his country.

The (democratic) Weimar Republic, he said, had been sickeningly decadent, a squalid period of German history, but after the Nazis had come to power something wonderful began to happen. Throughout all ages, even among the writings of the ancient Greeks, men had despaired of the younger generation. But in the late 1930s, he had a revelation that the young people of his country were better than his own generation had been. They were better fed, healthier in mind and body, more self-confident, better mannered, better educated, more idealistic, more generous, better citizens. Thanks to the Hitler Youth, and other NSDAP-supported organisations, the pride they felt for the Fatherland translated into a pride they felt in themselves.

I felt a great joy in this moral regeneration, the old German had said, so that I did not want the young to share my own cynicism and doubts.

Things are never simple! :(

No things are rarely simple. But I think if you look at most of human history, things were pretty woeful by our standards today. Life was not easy, disease, torture, war and the concept of fairness under the law was an alien concept.
 
Britain. America, at the moment.

Would you really say that moral decline has occurred in Britain and America "again and again"? Also, I tend to view those two as especially highly correlated. If standards change in one, there's always been a better than average chance of them changing in the other. I don't know that a change in those two necessarily counts as "two changes."

In any event, morality even within the US. has seemed to fluctuate depending on ho you measure it. To take popular depictions, morality on early 20th century America was reasonably austere, and rose to that point in time with the birth and rise of the "temperance movement." Margaret Sanger was arrested many times for touting the virtues of birth control, for example, and freedom of speech did not save her because the topic was viewed as scandalous. The temperance movement then eventually succeeded in banning the transportation and sale of alcohol at a federal level.

Then in the 1920's, you started to see a backlash against that kind of nonsense. "Flappers," for example, started wearing "excessive" makeup, drinking, smoking, driving automobiles (the nerve of those hussies!), and having casual sex with men. Sex started be depicted in novels, homosexuals gained some temporary respectability (in major cities).

Then by the 1950s all that was gone. Then came Kinsey.

It's not been a race all in one direction, there have been cycles.
 
Back
Top