Actually there has been many discussion about this topic, for example, here:
http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=83207
(pro-contra of abortion).
As per your question:
we're studying abortion in my ethics class, and the main questions with abortion are two simple ones:
1) Does a fetus have rights like a newborn child?
2) Is an unborn child an innocent human being?
If pro-lifers can prove any of these two questions, than they succeed in proving that abortion is wrong. And vice versa, pro-choicers can prove its upto the mother if they can prove any of these questions otherwise.
what do you guys think?
In my opinion:
1)
Does a fetus have rights like a newborn child?
Who has the priviledge to give the rights to live? Those who believe in God
will likely say it's God. I don't know how about any other religions, but in Islam
and Christian, yes, fetus does have rights to live. Considering Christian and
Muslim counts for 1.9 and 1.1 billion of the world population, they count altogether
for about half of the world population, so this should have been accepted as
universal law
As far as the legal convention, in the
American Convention on Human Rights
(also known as the Pact of San José) which is signed by 24 countries in 1969,
the 23 articles of Chapter II give a list of individual civil and political rights
due to all persons, including the right to life "in general,
from the moment
of conception", to humane treatment, to a fair trial, to privacy, to
freedom of conscience, freedom of assembly, freedom of movement, etc.
So yeah, fetus does have right to live like a newborn child. Killing it is murder.
2). Is an unborn child an innocent human being?
I would say an unborn child is the MOST innocent human being, as it is not
able to commit any legal crime yet.