It is 2009 and we are well into the 21st century. At this point in time 81 countries have completely abolished the death penalty in all cases, including murder and war crimes. A few countries keep capital punishment as a possiblity only in the cases of treason or horrendeous war crime. Many of the countries that still have the penalty of death in their laws as punishment, but none have actually handed down or communicated a death sentence in decades. To be a member in the European Union, the penalty must not be applied at all for membership into it's ranks.
With unwavering distincton the United States and China are the two countries that most frequently hand down and execute people for their crimes. Texas leads the US in number of inmates currently on death row, and number of inmates executed each year. Dubious honour;
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2009/09/07/090907fa_fact_grann?yrail
I don't expect many of you will take the time to read the 17 page report from the New Yorker, but it's tale is interesting.
Texas executed it's first scientifically proven innocent man in Feburary of 2004.
More evidence on the Willingham Fire;
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/document-preview.aspx?doc_id=10401390
http://www.slate.com/id/2227222/
http://www.innocenceproject.org/docs/ArsonReviewReport.pdf
As of today, 249 people who were once sentenced to death in the United States have been completely exhonerated of their crimes due to new scientific evidence, police/judicial misconduct, or by false statements coerced from jailhouse testimony.
Is it time to debate and abolish the death penalty?
With unwavering distincton the United States and China are the two countries that most frequently hand down and execute people for their crimes. Texas leads the US in number of inmates currently on death row, and number of inmates executed each year. Dubious honour;
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2009/09/07/090907fa_fact_grann?yrail
I don't expect many of you will take the time to read the 17 page report from the New Yorker, but it's tale is interesting.
Texas executed it's first scientifically proven innocent man in Feburary of 2004.
David Grann said:In 2005, Texas established a government commission to investigate allegations of error and misconduct by forensic scientists. The first cases that are being reviewed by the commission are those of Willingham and Willis. In mid-August, the noted fire scientist Craig Beyler, who was hired by the commission, completed his investigation. In a scathing report, he concluded that investigators in the Willingham case had no scientific basis for claiming that the fire was arson, ignored evidence that contradicted their theory, had no comprehension of flashover and fire dynamics, relied on discredited folklore, and failed to eliminate potential accidental or alternative causes of the fire. He said that Vasquez’s approach seemed to deny “rational reasoning” and was more “characteristic of mystics or psychics.” What’s more, Beyler determined that the investigation violated, as he put it to me, “not only the standards of today but even of the time period.” The commission is reviewing his findings, and plans to release its own report next year. Some legal scholars believe that the commission may narrowly assess the reliability of the scientific evidence. There is a chance, however, that Texas could become the first state to acknowledge officially that, since the advent of the modern judicial system, it had carried out the “execution of a legally and factually innocent person.”
More evidence on the Willingham Fire;
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/document-preview.aspx?doc_id=10401390
http://www.slate.com/id/2227222/
http://www.innocenceproject.org/docs/ArsonReviewReport.pdf
As of today, 249 people who were once sentenced to death in the United States have been completely exhonerated of their crimes due to new scientific evidence, police/judicial misconduct, or by false statements coerced from jailhouse testimony.
Is it time to debate and abolish the death penalty?
Last edited: