sowhatifit'sdark
Valued Senior Member
"But these impulses may be from below, not from above." I replied, "They do not seem to me to be such; but if I am the Devil's child, I will live then from the Devil."
No law can be sacred to me but that of my nature.
This little nugget came out of Emerson's self-relience and it is similar to something I have felt and thought for a long time. If I cannot trust my nature I am damned, period. If I trust my nature, then I have to have the courage to stand up to even God - perhaps it will turn out not to have been God, who knows.
Shall I drag myself around like a weight around my shoulders, hating myself, and then get a reward in Heaven, where I will, no doubt, have to continue dragging around, concealed somehow the great weight of both my nature and my self-hatred - however couched this latter is in terms like surrender or service, or my higher self vs. my lower.
This is the path to making a hell inside ourselves, even in heaven, even in Nirvana, in whatever after or within life there is.
And what is this part of me that thinks it has the authority to hate my nature?
And why would God give me a nature to hate?
Does he hate his own nature and make us like him?
Let's not get too hooked on God or if God or nirvana or samadhi or whatever exist.
A knife that cuts through a system of thought forms and says
I feel I am being asked to hate myself.
Oh, we can be distracted by questions about 'essential nature' or 'misguided perception' blah, blah - and my blah are not a denial of how hard this choice is, to trust that feeling, that is.
If some being comes up to me and says I should hate myself - however convoluted or subtle is the message - my answer is 'No'.
I am not saying it should be, I am saying that that is what it is.
Things have gotten better since I realized this.
And, amazingly, all those ideas about what an evil, selfish, stomping on others creature I would become have not turned out to be true.
Last edited: