On The Mysterious Disappearence of Gravitational Waves
A protons radius is near enough 10^-14cm...
(t=0 ~ E- oo >< 1.58316 x 10^-44 = 1.616 x 10^-33)
Simple here. At some, finite time, in the past (t=0 gave way for energy that is found to be proportional to an infinity which was conversely proportional within a Planck Time which was the same smallest compatible measurement of the Planck Length). The following equation will describe the estimated region in which this was allowed, the radius of a proton, found to be responsible of the release of energy and solid diffused energy that obey the law of p=mv.
(R- 10^-14cm- mp^2*=1.6726116 x 10^-27Kg)
* Proton rest mass (as shown with an equivalance with)
p=mv
where p is inversely proportional to to m, and so is v, so one can change the equations configurations,
(R- 10^-14cm- pv^2**=1.6726116 x 10^-27 kg)
Here the radius is proportional to the value of 10^-14cm again, which is inversely proportional to momentum multiplied by velocity raised to the power of two, which equals 1.67 x 10^-27kg
(Here, the rest mass is describing the baryons and the measurement of spacetime they came from which is something like the size of a proton.)
Now, we can say that due to the conservation of momentum, because one cannot have one configuration like this, without neglecting the equally proportionality of the invariant math, provided simply through the mechanism of p=mv:
(R- 10^-14cm- mp^2*=1.6726116 x 10^-27Kg)=(R- 10^-14cm- pv^2**=1.6726116 x 10^-27 kg) --------------- [1.A]
We can now put this into some easier notation, where R is radius, m is mass, p is momentum and v is velocity, and there values will be given as
R as itself and its value represented as a'
m for mass
p for momentum
(and both m and p's value is giving as -b')
and v is for velocity...
So we can make a neat configuration of equational beauty:
(R- a'- mp^2=-b'kg=R- a'- pv^2=-b') ----------------- [1.B]
And [1.B] is just a simpler mathematical configuration/equation of [1.A] - but like in most equations in physics, these really short notations to make things simpler, are actually usually quite hard, because they are themselves representative of configurants of two or more equations in one... In relativity, some shortened notations have several equational solutions bound into one equation. So, in my experience, the easiest way to learn the mathematics of physics, is to know the elongated equations, because they have no hidden agendas.
So let's see what [1.B] holds as a muti-configuration:
The variables a' and -b' are rotational coordinates in the conservation of momentum p with matter m and with velocity v and momentum p, as they must abide by the relativistic law of: p=mv - For virtual energy at this time, they will follow naturally:
E^2 = P^2c^2
And the real particles will abide by the relativistic rules of momentum and mass relation through”
E^2=M^2c^4+P^2c^2
Black Holes Predictions and Gravitational Waves
This will be for now, my small analysis of what would happen within the first moments of the universe. In theory, the very hot and dense condition of the universe at the beginning should have created clusters of black holes. There is now evidence to suggest this has been found. But it still isn’t enough to account for what is predicted… why>?
Black holes are predicted to form from the collapsed states of certain large stars, about several times larger
than our star. They do so, because of gravitational acceleration, given by the formula;
g=(GM)/d2**
Remember, a free falling object (*) will have the force of gravity totally cancelled out as it’s that weak.
We know that from Newton’s Force Equation is derived as f= ma, where this also shows an inertial
system to derive the acceleration due to gravity. So the gravitational acceleration is the mass of a
gravitationally warped object M, and the distance d from it. Also, instead of working out the mass of a black
hole you can work out its mass against the gravitational acceleration formula, by;
M=gd2/G**
And the Planck Mass given as:
(hc/2piG) ½ >
Energy Tensor is given as and Tab and k is a constant. This equation relates to the curvature of space and time, saying that stress energy is what causes the disturbance of spacetime. As we have seen, Einstein used Newton’s law of Gravity in his Field Equations, then we find the constant of k to have a value of:
k=8πG/c2
Where π is pi, and G is the gravitational constant. The following equation which is an extension of the above equation connects matter with energy with the geometry of spacetime (on the left):
Guv= (-8πG/c2)Tuv
A major consequence of General Relativity, is that it describe that time is dilated round strong gravitational fields.
t’=t√1-2GMc2r
Where,
• t' = Time inside the gravitational field.
• t = Time outside the gravitational field.
• M= The mass causing the gravitational field.
• r = The distance from the center of the gravitational field.
• c = the speed of light in a vacuum 186,000 mps.
• G = The gravitational constant = 6.6742 x10-11 N m2 kg-2
Supermassive black holes would have been created much earlier on – but there is some debate over this. However, I argue if that was true, the universe still would have been far too small for these supermassive black holes to evade collisions.
Also, these gravitational waves, created by black hole collisions very early on in the universe, would have helped in the production of the distribution of matter which seems very homogenous and Isotropic. This depends however on how these black holes had been distributed, but since logic suggests that the infinite density at time of the first Chronon, had to expand in equal proportion, so perhaps even the density produced black holes in the same manner of distribution.
The expected magnitude we should see in the universe today, concerning gravitational waves, is around:
h~ 10^-20
Of magnitudes. That is actually very small on a cosmological scale, and my proposal again explains that there was so many of them, they even radiated until decoherence prevailed over long radiating times.
Explains how these gravitational waves should be detected. It explains how curvature should emerge very strong gravitational excitations in space in forms of luxen waves. In other words, they move at light speed. This is why G must be exhaulted as a constant. Just as ‘’c’’ is a constant, it also makes light a constant. Another constant is ‘’k’’ or even ‘’e’’, there are many in physics, but let us not derail.
In effect, two colliding black holes would shudder spacetime, and should be very common, but it isn't. My theory also explains how this is possible.
It tells matter how to act under the influence of time. And time tells matter how to move through space. And space tells time how to warp. Even space tells matter how to act!!! This is a small iota of collection of mathematical solutions called ‘’the Equivalence Principle(s).’’ One well known one, and already covered a ‘’kizzilion’’ times, is E=Mc^2.
Einsteins Tensor Equations can all be derived from Newtonian Notions:
Gab=kTab
This equation is very important, where the Gab Einstein Tensor Factor, and the Stress Energy Tensor is given as and Tab and k is a constant. This equation relates to the curvature of space and time, saying that stress energy is what causes the disturbance of spacetime. As we have seen, Einstein used Newton’s law of Gravity in his Field Equations, then we find the constant of k to have a value of:
k=8πG/c2
All of this work in General Relativity would have crumbled through if it hadn’t abided by the solutions of geometrized units, but it seemed to predict them correctly:
GN = 1 = c.
There may be a way for the supermassive black hole to evade collisions though. The gradient of mass decreases and therefore so does the gradient of gravitation and density. Some supermassive black holes can have a magnitude of around 10^10 or perhaps even 10^15 time more than supercluster galaxies. They are postulated to be the main force that keeps all the matter and energy in their rotations around the supergalactic centers: And should be, I think, the real solution to that obsurdity we call dark matter and dark energy.
A supermassive black hole, possibly trillions upon millions of them in our galaxy, are in fact be lower than the density of air! - As the enigmatic black holes calculations go as the ave. density of air is:
(1.2 kg/m³(1.2 g/L) ---[A3]
(-), minus, the density of an average supermassive given as >
(-hc/2piG) ½ (M=gd2/G) ---[-A4]
Then in idiosyncratic methods,
[A3] – [-A4] = -x
Where -x is the final value of difference in density, which is found to be less than the density of water. But strange solutions can be provided to show that from the inside of one of the black holes, that are smaller in size, supposed to be compact of matter, is in fact the opposite from an totally hypothetical from observer inside.
Where R is radius, M is mass, V is volume, and D is density. We find that in a black hole, with a mass of about 10^2 of an entire solar mass, has more compact matter density. The radius we are told, is then found to be proportional to the mass it contains:
(R- D)
The we must find trough the black hole math that the density must then be proportional to its mass divided by its volume:
(D=M/V).
And we also find unique correlation between the radius and the volume raised to the power of three;
(V- R^3)
Then this has a final solution in Einstein’s curved spacetime with the black hole reduced to have a density totally equivalent to its mass raised to the second power:
(D- M^-2)
Which means that the insides of even small black holes are not very dense to an imaginary observer; but it is still much more denser inside than what would be found in a supermassive black hole.
Conclusion: Gravitational waves are now extremely weak, through radiative processes. Relativity says that they SHOULD BE frequent, but they are showing evidence in my model that they have been given a suffice amount of time to condense into quantum wave function collapsed systems. This is why they are so rare, because the WHERE SO frequent.
It also seems very evident, that the larger the black hole, the less density it has, and if this is true, then just speculate for the moment on the universe. Scientists already know that the particles and molecules we are made of isn't very dense at all... not dense at all compaired to Bose Condensates or super-dense metal found in the cores of massive stars... THEN our universe may very well be a black hole as well, since we know that the evidence points to this. Moreso, we would survive the dreaded ''mangling'' proffessed by Hawking, but rather there is in the Black Hole model, that there is an inner-boundary that flows spacelike, the normal experience we are used to, and wouldn't cause biological life any harm.
It's inetersting though to also postulate that by working up from the equations frist describing on small scales, the more evident it seemed to me that these waves where confined still in a very small space compaired to today! The radius of the present universe, is about 10^26m, give or take a few. At the early stages, black holes would have been forced to fall into each other very early on, and this might be why they are so scarce to astronomy.
(*) For those who are interested in Free Fall, as spoken about, consider the following math of Newton, which Einstein worked from:
M = mass of Earth
m=mass of of an object falling down through the sky toward terra firma
F=GMm/r^2
and the laws of motion say that:
f=ma
If m is the law of gravitation, and is the same as the m describing the laws of motion, then the motion of gravity is:
ma=GMm/r^2
and m can be removed:
a=GM/r^2
------------------------------------------------------------------------
So, what do you think? Could the very pervasive gravitational waves at the beginning of time suffered the natural collapse effects in quantum decoherence?
A protons radius is near enough 10^-14cm...
(t=0 ~ E- oo >< 1.58316 x 10^-44 = 1.616 x 10^-33)
Simple here. At some, finite time, in the past (t=0 gave way for energy that is found to be proportional to an infinity which was conversely proportional within a Planck Time which was the same smallest compatible measurement of the Planck Length). The following equation will describe the estimated region in which this was allowed, the radius of a proton, found to be responsible of the release of energy and solid diffused energy that obey the law of p=mv.
(R- 10^-14cm- mp^2*=1.6726116 x 10^-27Kg)
* Proton rest mass (as shown with an equivalance with)
p=mv
where p is inversely proportional to to m, and so is v, so one can change the equations configurations,
(R- 10^-14cm- pv^2**=1.6726116 x 10^-27 kg)
Here the radius is proportional to the value of 10^-14cm again, which is inversely proportional to momentum multiplied by velocity raised to the power of two, which equals 1.67 x 10^-27kg
(Here, the rest mass is describing the baryons and the measurement of spacetime they came from which is something like the size of a proton.)
Now, we can say that due to the conservation of momentum, because one cannot have one configuration like this, without neglecting the equally proportionality of the invariant math, provided simply through the mechanism of p=mv:
(R- 10^-14cm- mp^2*=1.6726116 x 10^-27Kg)=(R- 10^-14cm- pv^2**=1.6726116 x 10^-27 kg) --------------- [1.A]
We can now put this into some easier notation, where R is radius, m is mass, p is momentum and v is velocity, and there values will be given as
R as itself and its value represented as a'
m for mass
p for momentum
(and both m and p's value is giving as -b')
and v is for velocity...
So we can make a neat configuration of equational beauty:
(R- a'- mp^2=-b'kg=R- a'- pv^2=-b') ----------------- [1.B]
And [1.B] is just a simpler mathematical configuration/equation of [1.A] - but like in most equations in physics, these really short notations to make things simpler, are actually usually quite hard, because they are themselves representative of configurants of two or more equations in one... In relativity, some shortened notations have several equational solutions bound into one equation. So, in my experience, the easiest way to learn the mathematics of physics, is to know the elongated equations, because they have no hidden agendas.
So let's see what [1.B] holds as a muti-configuration:
The variables a' and -b' are rotational coordinates in the conservation of momentum p with matter m and with velocity v and momentum p, as they must abide by the relativistic law of: p=mv - For virtual energy at this time, they will follow naturally:
E^2 = P^2c^2
And the real particles will abide by the relativistic rules of momentum and mass relation through”
E^2=M^2c^4+P^2c^2
Black Holes Predictions and Gravitational Waves
This will be for now, my small analysis of what would happen within the first moments of the universe. In theory, the very hot and dense condition of the universe at the beginning should have created clusters of black holes. There is now evidence to suggest this has been found. But it still isn’t enough to account for what is predicted… why>?
Black holes are predicted to form from the collapsed states of certain large stars, about several times larger
than our star. They do so, because of gravitational acceleration, given by the formula;
g=(GM)/d2**
Remember, a free falling object (*) will have the force of gravity totally cancelled out as it’s that weak.
We know that from Newton’s Force Equation is derived as f= ma, where this also shows an inertial
system to derive the acceleration due to gravity. So the gravitational acceleration is the mass of a
gravitationally warped object M, and the distance d from it. Also, instead of working out the mass of a black
hole you can work out its mass against the gravitational acceleration formula, by;
M=gd2/G**
And the Planck Mass given as:
(hc/2piG) ½ >
Energy Tensor is given as and Tab and k is a constant. This equation relates to the curvature of space and time, saying that stress energy is what causes the disturbance of spacetime. As we have seen, Einstein used Newton’s law of Gravity in his Field Equations, then we find the constant of k to have a value of:
k=8πG/c2
Where π is pi, and G is the gravitational constant. The following equation which is an extension of the above equation connects matter with energy with the geometry of spacetime (on the left):
Guv= (-8πG/c2)Tuv
A major consequence of General Relativity, is that it describe that time is dilated round strong gravitational fields.
t’=t√1-2GMc2r
Where,
• t' = Time inside the gravitational field.
• t = Time outside the gravitational field.
• M= The mass causing the gravitational field.
• r = The distance from the center of the gravitational field.
• c = the speed of light in a vacuum 186,000 mps.
• G = The gravitational constant = 6.6742 x10-11 N m2 kg-2
Supermassive black holes would have been created much earlier on – but there is some debate over this. However, I argue if that was true, the universe still would have been far too small for these supermassive black holes to evade collisions.
Also, these gravitational waves, created by black hole collisions very early on in the universe, would have helped in the production of the distribution of matter which seems very homogenous and Isotropic. This depends however on how these black holes had been distributed, but since logic suggests that the infinite density at time of the first Chronon, had to expand in equal proportion, so perhaps even the density produced black holes in the same manner of distribution.
The expected magnitude we should see in the universe today, concerning gravitational waves, is around:
h~ 10^-20
Of magnitudes. That is actually very small on a cosmological scale, and my proposal again explains that there was so many of them, they even radiated until decoherence prevailed over long radiating times.
Explains how these gravitational waves should be detected. It explains how curvature should emerge very strong gravitational excitations in space in forms of luxen waves. In other words, they move at light speed. This is why G must be exhaulted as a constant. Just as ‘’c’’ is a constant, it also makes light a constant. Another constant is ‘’k’’ or even ‘’e’’, there are many in physics, but let us not derail.
In effect, two colliding black holes would shudder spacetime, and should be very common, but it isn't. My theory also explains how this is possible.
It tells matter how to act under the influence of time. And time tells matter how to move through space. And space tells time how to warp. Even space tells matter how to act!!! This is a small iota of collection of mathematical solutions called ‘’the Equivalence Principle(s).’’ One well known one, and already covered a ‘’kizzilion’’ times, is E=Mc^2.
Einsteins Tensor Equations can all be derived from Newtonian Notions:
Gab=kTab
This equation is very important, where the Gab Einstein Tensor Factor, and the Stress Energy Tensor is given as and Tab and k is a constant. This equation relates to the curvature of space and time, saying that stress energy is what causes the disturbance of spacetime. As we have seen, Einstein used Newton’s law of Gravity in his Field Equations, then we find the constant of k to have a value of:
k=8πG/c2
All of this work in General Relativity would have crumbled through if it hadn’t abided by the solutions of geometrized units, but it seemed to predict them correctly:
GN = 1 = c.
There may be a way for the supermassive black hole to evade collisions though. The gradient of mass decreases and therefore so does the gradient of gravitation and density. Some supermassive black holes can have a magnitude of around 10^10 or perhaps even 10^15 time more than supercluster galaxies. They are postulated to be the main force that keeps all the matter and energy in their rotations around the supergalactic centers: And should be, I think, the real solution to that obsurdity we call dark matter and dark energy.
A supermassive black hole, possibly trillions upon millions of them in our galaxy, are in fact be lower than the density of air! - As the enigmatic black holes calculations go as the ave. density of air is:
(1.2 kg/m³(1.2 g/L) ---[A3]
(-), minus, the density of an average supermassive given as >
(-hc/2piG) ½ (M=gd2/G) ---[-A4]
Then in idiosyncratic methods,
[A3] – [-A4] = -x
Where -x is the final value of difference in density, which is found to be less than the density of water. But strange solutions can be provided to show that from the inside of one of the black holes, that are smaller in size, supposed to be compact of matter, is in fact the opposite from an totally hypothetical from observer inside.
Where R is radius, M is mass, V is volume, and D is density. We find that in a black hole, with a mass of about 10^2 of an entire solar mass, has more compact matter density. The radius we are told, is then found to be proportional to the mass it contains:
(R- D)
The we must find trough the black hole math that the density must then be proportional to its mass divided by its volume:
(D=M/V).
And we also find unique correlation between the radius and the volume raised to the power of three;
(V- R^3)
Then this has a final solution in Einstein’s curved spacetime with the black hole reduced to have a density totally equivalent to its mass raised to the second power:
(D- M^-2)
Which means that the insides of even small black holes are not very dense to an imaginary observer; but it is still much more denser inside than what would be found in a supermassive black hole.
Conclusion: Gravitational waves are now extremely weak, through radiative processes. Relativity says that they SHOULD BE frequent, but they are showing evidence in my model that they have been given a suffice amount of time to condense into quantum wave function collapsed systems. This is why they are so rare, because the WHERE SO frequent.
It also seems very evident, that the larger the black hole, the less density it has, and if this is true, then just speculate for the moment on the universe. Scientists already know that the particles and molecules we are made of isn't very dense at all... not dense at all compaired to Bose Condensates or super-dense metal found in the cores of massive stars... THEN our universe may very well be a black hole as well, since we know that the evidence points to this. Moreso, we would survive the dreaded ''mangling'' proffessed by Hawking, but rather there is in the Black Hole model, that there is an inner-boundary that flows spacelike, the normal experience we are used to, and wouldn't cause biological life any harm.
It's inetersting though to also postulate that by working up from the equations frist describing on small scales, the more evident it seemed to me that these waves where confined still in a very small space compaired to today! The radius of the present universe, is about 10^26m, give or take a few. At the early stages, black holes would have been forced to fall into each other very early on, and this might be why they are so scarce to astronomy.
(*) For those who are interested in Free Fall, as spoken about, consider the following math of Newton, which Einstein worked from:
M = mass of Earth
m=mass of of an object falling down through the sky toward terra firma
F=GMm/r^2
and the laws of motion say that:
f=ma
If m is the law of gravitation, and is the same as the m describing the laws of motion, then the motion of gravity is:
ma=GMm/r^2
and m can be removed:
a=GM/r^2
------------------------------------------------------------------------
So, what do you think? Could the very pervasive gravitational waves at the beginning of time suffered the natural collapse effects in quantum decoherence?
