Deceptions and Myths of the Bible

iam

Banned
Banned
All metaphysical philosophers and interested people should read this book. The author has a profound understanding of comparative religion. He shows that all religions teach the same thing, but that christianity only took out parts of the ancient pagan teachings to fit its own agendas. Graham is an excellent writer and a true skeptic. He examines both sides of the evidence, and comes to accurate conclusions. One of the most intresting parts of the book, is that he shows that the devil is the shadow side of god. He brilliantly shows how the christian churches did not find an original religion, but that their religion is nothing more than a rehash of ancient pagan religions. He also slams science in the process, showing that many so called scientific discoveries were known long ago.

101 Myths of the Bible examines many of the most famous stories in the Old Testament and shows the various influences that led to the writing. Among the subjects explored are the earlier versions of many biblical stories that were told among Israel's neighbors, the strong Egyptian influences on many of the biblical accounts, and the internal political and religious feuds in ancient Israel that led to various propagandistic versions of earlier history. Among the many revelations in the book, we learn that:

Moses didn't write the Ten Commandment
David didn't kill Goliath
Samson did not pull down a Philistine temple
Joshua didn't bring down the walls of Jericho
Sodom and Gommorah never existed
Noah's ark did not land on Mount Ararat
The story of Esther originally had nothing to do with the Jews of Persia.

The Myths of the Bible and The Jesus Mysteries

This riveting and controversial book reveals how the ancient editors of the Bible used the myths and legends of neighboring cultures to build the foundations of the monotheistic religions of today.

101 Myths of the Bible exposes the contradictions embedded in many of the tales and events in the Old Testament, exploring the story behind the story to determine what really happened.

Greenberg unveils a long and continuous relationship between ancient Israel and Egypt, and directly links Egyptian mythology to Hebrew interpretation of and beliefs about its earliest history.

101 Myths is divided into three sections: Myths of the Beginning, Myths of the Founders, and Myths of the Heroes. Explained are how the forbidden fruit motif derived from Sumerian myths, how the tree of life and the tree of knowledge of good and evil represent the Egyptian deities Shu and Tefnut, and how Adam and Eve were the Egyptian deities Geb and Nut. The parallels between the Bible and Sumerian, Babylonian, and Egyptian myths seem to be strong and numerous.

As for The Jesus Mysteries, its inside jacket has this to say.

Drawing on the cutting edge of modern scholarship, authors Time Freke and Peter Gandy present overwhelming evidence that Jesus of the New Testament is a mythical figure.

Far from being eyewitness accounts, as is traditionally held, the Gospels are actually Jewish adaptations of ancient Pagan myths of the dying and resurrecting godman Osiris-Dionysus. The supernatural story of Jesus is not the history of a miraculous Messiah, but a carefully crafted spiritual allegory designed to gudie initiates on a journey of mystical discovery.

The book poses a series of what if questions?

What if…

there was absolutely no evidence for the existence of a historical Jesus?
for thousands of years Pagans had also followed a Son of God?
this Pagan saviour was also born of a virgin on the 25th of December before three shepherds, turned water into wine at a wedding, died and was resurrected at Easter, and offered his body and blood as Holy Communion?
these Pagan myths had been rewritten as the gospel of Jesus Christ?
the earliest Gnostic Christians knew the Jesus story was a myth?
Christianity turned out to be a continuation of Paganism by another name?
A Jesus Mysteries Yahoo group has been setup to discuss the book and the question “Was Jesus an historical figure?” Some interesting discussions can be found there, as well as a list of reference material. Newsgroups such as alt.history and alt.history.ancient-worlds also carry pertinent discussions. This post to those newsgroups sums up some of the evidence questioning the existence of a historical Jesus. I’ll excerpt from that post here.

There was No Historical Jesus because:

Contemporary writers say nothing till a century or so later (when they begin to repeat Christian sayings)
The life of Jesus of Nazareth is not known until 2nd century (no 1st century writer knows anything about Joseph, Mary, Bethlehem, the miracles, the healings, the feedings, Gethsemane, the Trial, Judas, the Last Supper, Pilate, Peter’s denials etc, etc)
The Gospels are not known of till mid 2nd century (Papias, Marcion, Justin)
When the Gospels appear, they are admitted as not eye witness accounts (Papias, Irenaeus, Clement, Tertullian)
As the Gospels appear the Gnostics argue against a physical Jesus (Basilides)
As the Gospels appear, pagans and Christians criticise the Gospels as fiction (Dionysos Corinth, Celsus, Porphyry)
The Gospels are clearly inspired by a mix of midrash on the OT, and an influx of hellenistic paganism (a good book just out compares Mark to Homer - The Homeric Epics and the Gospel of Mark by Dennis R. MacDonald)
By the same author is this intriguing Chronological History of the Gospels.
 
Last edited:
You 'things' are UTTERLY, CONTEMPTIBLY, MONSTROUSLY, and UNETHICALLY FULL OF SHIT.

Take a breath! deep! in-out-easy! calm down iam, you'll get used to the idiots who frequent this forum. :(

Thanks for the ref. How about a link?

Godless
 
Back
Top