I was asked yet again in a recent thread about my views on the death penalty. Now my ideas on important things are constantly under review, but at the moment...
I am against death as a social control, as part of a judicial system. Why? Well, first, I don't give a damn about the people it kills - unless they happen to be innocent. There's a problem. It's too permanent a solution for i fallible system. Anyway, so the first problem is that some people are actually innocent. The second problem is that the death penalty turns the person who issues the order, and the person who presses the button, into a person who would kill a bound, defenceless human. No social mechanism should require any member of a society to become such a person. It turns the expediters of that social mechanism, into cowards and murderers themselves.
Now, I am not totally against killing. Killing is part of nature. Sometimes I think it's necessary or preferable within human societies. I just don't like it as a method of social control.
I am against death as a social control, as part of a judicial system. Why? Well, first, I don't give a damn about the people it kills - unless they happen to be innocent. There's a problem. It's too permanent a solution for i fallible system. Anyway, so the first problem is that some people are actually innocent. The second problem is that the death penalty turns the person who issues the order, and the person who presses the button, into a person who would kill a bound, defenceless human. No social mechanism should require any member of a society to become such a person. It turns the expediters of that social mechanism, into cowards and murderers themselves.
Now, I am not totally against killing. Killing is part of nature. Sometimes I think it's necessary or preferable within human societies. I just don't like it as a method of social control.