Iran issues fatwa on Azeri writer
Grand Ayatollah Lankarani is said to have issued a fatwa calling for the death of the writer and also the person responsible for publishing his articles. Earlier, an Iranian cleric had offered his house as a reward to anyone who killed the Azeri writer. But this latest fatwa comes from one of the dozen or so Grand Ayatollahs in Iran, who has a large following. Well here we go again. Another stupid Death Fatwa.
I don’t understand why these Religious-people can not simply debate the points. To try and silence one's critics by bludgeoning them to death caveman-style (Ooo and win a new house) simply implies that your argument doesn't have an intellectual leg to stand on or that you are so caveman-like in mentality that the impulse to kill simply overrides any higher intellects - if they are even present.
IMHO, if one can read a Philosophical treaty, especially one purportedly from God herself, and not even reach the most basic of enlightenments, that being “killing people is evil” - well, that really says something about the treaty – doesn’t it? I mean come on here, how could one read an entire book and not walk away with this most simplest and fundamental principals? If not, then reading the book was a complete and utter waste of time.
Wouldn't everyone agree?
Michael
Grand Ayatollah Lankarani is said to have issued a fatwa calling for the death of the writer and also the person responsible for publishing his articles. Earlier, an Iranian cleric had offered his house as a reward to anyone who killed the Azeri writer. But this latest fatwa comes from one of the dozen or so Grand Ayatollahs in Iran, who has a large following. Well here we go again. Another stupid Death Fatwa.
I don’t understand why these Religious-people can not simply debate the points. To try and silence one's critics by bludgeoning them to death caveman-style (Ooo and win a new house) simply implies that your argument doesn't have an intellectual leg to stand on or that you are so caveman-like in mentality that the impulse to kill simply overrides any higher intellects - if they are even present.
IMHO, if one can read a Philosophical treaty, especially one purportedly from God herself, and not even reach the most basic of enlightenments, that being “killing people is evil” - well, that really says something about the treaty – doesn’t it? I mean come on here, how could one read an entire book and not walk away with this most simplest and fundamental principals? If not, then reading the book was a complete and utter waste of time.
Wouldn't everyone agree?
Michael