Buffalo Roam:
He shot them precisely to "assuage his own failure in life". He knew that by doing this, he would gain huge media coverage and become "famous". In his frame of mind, it was a perfectly rational choice of what to do to get what he wanted.
Again, you seem to be contradicting yourself. You're saying he decided this, and chose to do that, and that he made the choices he did as the result of some kind of reasoning process and (importantly) not on a spur-of-the-moment impulse. That makes him rational, by your own argument.
A person ought not to be responsible for irrational behviour, right?
We can only be held responsible for things under our control, and irrational, crazy actions are not.
If you're going to say he was sick and needed help, you can't simultaneously hold him entirely responsible for his actions, can you?
A big pile of Bull Shit, no rational person shoot another person, let alone 32 people that present no threat to his life, only a looser shoots 32 people to assuage his on failure in life...
He shot them precisely to "assuage his own failure in life". He knew that by doing this, he would gain huge media coverage and become "famous". In his frame of mind, it was a perfectly rational choice of what to do to get what he wanted.
he is the one who couldn't face his personnel failure and make the choice to seek help to change the situation, it was his decisions, in trying not to face and accept the facts in his life, and seek help out side him self that lead to this, he was so afraid to admit that he was responsible for his own failings that he placed the blame on others and the rationalized their killings to salve his own failings.
Again, you seem to be contradicting yourself. You're saying he decided this, and chose to do that, and that he made the choices he did as the result of some kind of reasoning process and (importantly) not on a spur-of-the-moment impulse. That makes him rational, by your own argument.
...their the ones responsible for their own failure, they will take it out on people who are innocent, It is Cho Seung-hui who is the one who made the choice, and it is him alone who has to carry the blame.
A person ought not to be responsible for irrational behviour, right?
We can only be held responsible for things under our control, and irrational, crazy actions are not.
If you're going to say he was sick and needed help, you can't simultaneously hold him entirely responsible for his actions, can you?